Quote:
Originally Posted by Sienna91
Because if this is true then we will have another problem on our hands because a lot of low-income workers are not going to want to return back to work especially if this is stretched out
Before companies started laying people off they basically were letting people not work with no repercussions if they felt uncomfortable because of the coronavirus
Why would people who only make 10 to $15 an hour want to work and receive less then staying home and getting paid more?
Sounds like a recipe for disaster
|
Companies do not want to keep thier people on the payroll as this shutdown has been going on for quite some time, companies are furloughing people not firing them, remember the word furlough, so the companies save money the govt is paying the unemployment, keep people a float, and yes the companies are getting money as well from the govt, loans etc
when companies call people back to work they have to accept, if they refuse, then the unemployment is cut off. again furlough is the key, a lot of car companies are looking a t long shutdowns due to people not buying cars, instead of firing, they furlough.
i also look at it as beneficial to the companies as well
This was widely supported by both parties and trump wanted it.
no issue with it, now if companies are not going to rehire the people, then they deserve unemployment, they lost thier job through no fault of their own who wants to stay unemployed it will run out its not a life policy
Everyone wins, fox news just doesnt understand why this was done.
its a win win for everyone.
Pussy gonna have to work though, no unemployment for the hooklers lol