Do they really want us to believe that the 'hackers' were so stupid and lazy that they used their own IP addresses? Or do they really want us to believe that the DNC hired, Russian ex-pat owned company, partially funded by Google was the right choice and better than the FBI to investigate the alleged 'hack'?
No, I didn't watch the vid either, as I suspected it would not discuss Seth Rich or the Arwan clan. But I do know that 'hacking' that system from afar would not yield a 23MB/sec xfer rate.
That whole kettle of fish stinks worse than Old Hitlery's undies after an hour of carpet munching from Debbie Washyershorts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
Didn't watch the vid but
I don't think the FBI would know. Crowdstrike gave them a copy of the dns logs and didn't let them examine them untouched on the server.
Two things gives me the impression the FBI is woefully techno challenged. 1) No Russia "collusion" (whatever that means) was found by the FBI. What was found was by the social media companies themselves and supposedly some of that information was already found in 2015 and published.
2) When the NE power grid was hacked, the Russian connection was a DNS address. They're fungible. A dns address isn't a "Putin fingerprint."
Hillary/Putin 2020! Third times a charm!
|
Hacking rule #1
