Why Do These Old White Men Think These Women Want Them

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Most large companies cannot "afford" an "investigation" by the EEOC with respect to their discriminatory practices on just about any level. When EEOC starts snooping they open up all the files and not just the ones specifically associated with the complaint.

Almost no company of any size can pass that scrutiny. It's easier to get rid of the accused and try to settle with the accuser. The punitive damage awards are horrendous. That's why the Congressional slush fund.

congressional slush fund? no one knew about this.

[IIFFOFRDB]

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Check out Larry Sinclair.

I've already suggested that to the dumb fuck. He also doesn't realize most of these escorts white and black have NBA policies, lol. That dummy is in a world of his own.


Jim

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Marion Barry, his crack, his prostitute, etc. You're giving black men a pass? Really? Just about every rapper is probably guilty of the mistreatment of women. Speaking of OJ Simpson...get the picture dumbass? Remember Rep. Gus Savage and his African slave trips. At least he thought of them as slaves that he could do anything with.

Just about every Rapper is gay, or at least took it up the ass just to get their music published on a record label.


Jim

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Most large companies cannot "afford" an "investigation" by the EEOC with respect to their discriminatory practices on just about any level. When EEOC starts snooping they open up all the files and not just the ones specifically associated with the complaint.

So its done cause they are scared of figting them? BUT isn't the fact they are firing someone with no cause reason for them to get their asses sued off??

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Almost no company of any size can pass that scrutiny. It's easier to get rid of the accused and try to settle with the accuser. The punitive damage awards are horrendous. That's why the Congressional slush fund.

Sounds to me then, like we need to REVAMP the monetary awards.

And as to that slush fund, i STILL WANT TO know who the hell voted for it, WHEN it was installed, and HOW IT WAS fucking legal!!!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by garhkal

So its done cause they are scared of figting them? BUT isn't the fact they are firing someone with no cause reason for them to get their asses sued off?

I'm not sure about whom you are speaking, but terminating a person for sexual harassment is "with cause," primarily because "it's against the law" and secondarily is a violation of the written policies of probably 99% of the companies with 20 or more employees. Furthermore, most of these companies will offer an option of voluntary termination in lieu of being "fired"! (BTW: Clarence Thomas was responsible for creating the EEOC guidelines on "sexual harassment.")

Sounds to me then, like we need to REVAMP the monetary awards.

What monetary awards?

And as to that slush fund, i STILL WANT TO know who the hell voted for it, WHEN it was installed, and HOW IT WAS fucking legal!!!

The "issues" with respect to the "slush fund" ... (1) other persons beside "sexual harassment" victims were paid from the "slush fund"; (2) more than likely "non-disclosure" agreements were a part of the settlements that may have been mutually sought by the victims as well to avoid details of activities from being publicized .... (these victims have "moved on" with their lives, established long term relationships, have children, families, and/or current employment that might be put in jeopardy.

A problem with "witch hunts" is non-witches get drowned or burned at the stake, too!

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Marion Barry, his crack, his prostitute, etc.

that's my Boy right there. Motherfucker had 9 lives, as they say. he was a Chick magnet, despite pissing off many of D.C.'s elite. he got away with shit for years, and even after the famous Hotel bust (a year after this People article), he returned to serve as Mayor of D.C.

people.com/archive/washingtons-mayor-with-nine-lives-marion-barry-risks-another-amid-rumors-of-scandal-vol-31-no-2/

[LexusLover]

D.C. is a "Liberal" community and practices affirmative action.

[goodolboy]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

that's my Boy right there. Motherfucker had 9 lives, as they say. he was a Chick magnet, despite pissing off many of D.C.'s elite. he got away with shit for years, and even after the famous Hotel bust (a year after this People article), he returned to serve as Mayor of D.C.

people.com/archive/washingtons-mayor-with-nine-lives-marion-barry-risks-another-amid-rumors-of-scandal-vol-31-no-2/

I think Mayor Barry is the first man to get busted with a prostitute smoking crack and get elected again. I like Chris Rocks take on it. https://youtu.be/mTMif8cGlcE

[goodolboy]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

No wonder he hates Obama so much because Melania like all the other women want to fuck Barry...

I'm pretty sure Obama would be more interested in one of Trumps sons instead of his wife. It was common knowledge in Chicago that Hussein is a fag and hung out at gay bath houses, he certainly looks and acts the part. He seemed to prefer catching over pitching.

“He always portrayed himself as a foreign student,” Pope said. “Girls were never anything that he ever was interested in ... He would get with these older white gay men, and this is how we just pretty much had the impression that that’s how he was procuring his cocaine.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...n_4242447.html

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Just about every Rapper is gay, or at least took it up the ass just to get their music published on a record label.


Jim

That’s a lie.

Why must you lie?

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

That’s a lie.

Why must you lie?

Well here's a video were they pretty much are admitting it.

Jim


https://youtu.be/Xt7IzeIqNJA

[goodolboy]

"The memoir is a detailed (and graphic) account of down-low life, gay sex parties and secret societies, where some of hip-hop's major artists openly sleep with men, only to go home to their wives and girlfriends at night's end. (A person who is "down low" considers himself straight but regularly sleeps with members of the same sex; the term is frequently used when describing black men."

http://www.newsweek.com/exposing-hip...bculture-89591

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Well here's a video were they pretty much are admitting it.

Jim


https://youtu.be/Xt7IzeIqNJA

I particularly like the opening disclaimer when they "pretty much are admitting" that the footage was stolen and used without permission.

Your point is?

Ahhh, you saw it on YOUTUBE!

Well then that makes it true! (Fucking lying RETARD!)

But Sandy Hook was staged? So was the moon landing, right?

HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I'm not sure about whom you are speaking, but terminating a person for sexual harassment is "with cause," primarily because "it's against the law" and secondarily is a violation of the written policies of probably 99% of the companies with 20 or more employees. Furthermore, most of these companies will offer an option of voluntary termination in lieu of being "fired"! (BTW: Clarence Thomas was responsible for creating the EEOC guidelines on "sexual harassment.")

IF its just for a mere accusation of fraud though, then its NOT 'with just cause'. Just like if a store terminates someone for a mere accusation of theft of company property. NO facts, no evidence, just someone's say, that is not a 'just cause' firing.. AND YES i have seen people who DID get fired that way and sued, THEN WON..

Originally Posted by LexusLover

What monetary awards?

The Monetary awards the women would/should win if they did sue for harassment and it was proven in a court of law..

Originally Posted by LexusLover

The "issues" with respect to the "slush fund" ... (1) other persons beside "sexual harassment" victims were paid from the "slush fund"; (2) more than likely "non-disclosure" agreements were a part of the settlements that may have been mutually sought by the victims as well to avoid details of activities from being publicized .... (these victims have "moved on" with their lives, established long term relationships, have children, families, and/or current employment that might be put in jeopardy.

But isn't there fact it is a 'secret slush fund' making it illegal..? AND IF they all signed NDA's, then those women now coming out about Conner and others, are in violation of the laws sinc they signed the contract (The NDA) to not speak about it..