Military vote suppressed again!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

LINK ?

Couldn't be more "traditional" than the dim-retards being against the concept of soldiers voting from the very beginning, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

The only previous wartime election had been held in 1812, and prior to 1860, not a single state sported legislation that enfranchised soldiers or sailors away from their home districts.

In early 1864, the problem had still not been uniformly resolved: seventeen states had passed legislation permitting soldiers to vote from the field or by proxy while the issue was staunchly opposed in the remaining states by dim-retard governors and legislatures. The fight for soldier suffrage had been picked up by Republicans following sobering defeats in the election of 1862, in which twenty seats were lost in the House of Representatives to the dim-retards’ gain of 27, and was almost universally opposed by dim-retards who feared that soldiers would vote overwhelmingly for Lincoln.

The Election of 1862 convinced Republican leaders that change was necessary to combat the “race baiting” tactics of dim-retards and demonstrated the potential importance of a soldier vote.

As 1864 approached, dim-retards employed many of the same tactics that had been so successful during the midterms.

(p. 3, The Army for Lincoln in 1864: Electing the President, Ending the War, and Changing the Voting Process)

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Couldn't be more "traditional" than the dim-retards being against the concept of soldiers voting from the very beginning, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Got anything more recent than the 1800 hundreds, you babbling buffoon?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Got anything more recent than the 1800 hundreds, you babbling buffoon?

You'd be the babbling baboon that wanted cited proof that it was a dim-retard "tradition", Ekim the Inbred Chimp, or did your stupid-ass forget what you asked for?

[Yssup Rider]

Quit hijacking the thread. And get your shit straight, IBIdiot. This OP is so old it demands an explanation from SLOBBRIN.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Quit hijacking the thread. And get your shit straight, IBIdiot. This OP is so old it demands an explanation from SLOBBRIN.

You'd be the one owing a tree an apology for the air you breath, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

It's still current. Democrats ALWAYS try to suppress the military vote. It's tradition.

Your tradition is to make absolute statements about your opinions and present them as facts.cts.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Your tradition is to make absolute statements about your opinions and present them as facts.cts.

At least he has his own opinions! More than you can say.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the babbling baboon that wanted cited proof that it was a dim-retard "tradition", Ekim the Inbred Chimp, or did your stupid-ass forget what you asked for?

TRANSLATED : I got nothing i'va.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

TRANSLATED : i'va got nothing.

FTFYour dumb-ass, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

FTFY my dumb-ass, Ekim.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You'd be the stupid-ass chimp that handed your dumb-ass to yourself on a platter, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. When presented with an OP documenting dim-retard issues with military votes for president in 2012, you demanded a citation establishing "tradition", Ekim the Inbred Chimp. That was provided for your very stupid ass, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Then you promptly forgot that it was your stupid-ass that asked for that citation, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Subsequently, you asked for evidence "more current" than 1864, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Somehow your stupid-ass had already managed to forget the OP was about the "2012 presidential election", Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

FYI, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, until November 8, there is no presidential election more current than the 2012 presidential election.

You're genuinely stupid, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Your tradition is to make absolute statements about your opinions and present them as facts.cts.

No, my tradition is to state facts that piss off liberal idiots like you, MünchausenMan.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the stupid-ass chimp that handed your dumb-ass to yourself on a platter, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. When presented with an OP documenting dim-retard issues with military votes for president in 2012, you demanded a citation establishing "tradition", Ekim the Inbred Chimp. That was provided for your very stupid ass, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Then you promptly forgot that it was your stupid-ass that asked for that citation, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Subsequently, you asked for evidence "more current" than 1864, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Somehow your stupid-ass had already managed to forget the OP was about the "2012 presidential election", Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

FYI, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, until November 8, there is no presidential election more current than the 2012 presidential election.

You're genuinely stupid, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

TRANSLATED : I got nothing i'va, but some traditional insults, just no facts.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

i'va got nothing

FTFY, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

At least he has his own opinions! More than you can say.

First I'll address your opinion.
Like most of yours (opinions) it lacks backing facts, is generally incorrect, and has no reasoning to back it up.

Since I just presented an opinion, it leaves you looking like you usually do'

Ignorant and hapless.

And even if I only have a single opinion, I won't mistake it for fact or claim it to be one. Something you do on a regular basis.

Douche-bag.