Review titles without city name?

[john_deere]

[busternutzs]

Each person has his own style of doing a review and not putting the city in the title does not make it right or wrong.

Is it helpful? Maybe so but is it necessary 100% of the time? No probably not.

[john_deere]

bullshit. it does make it wrong in this area because it's a waste of fucking time to click on a review THEN find out the chick is 300 miles away.

[oldpun]

I almost always put the provider and city in the title of my reviews. However, I don't see how it is that big a deal since the second and third line give you the location and the provider. It's not like you have to read the whole thing to figure it out. And unlike some other areas I am not pressed for time reading ALL of a days content on the West Texas board.

[quick draw mc graw]

Dang.
I'm glad i put the girls name and city in the title on my last review....I do concur, i am more likely to read a review if it has the city I am in

Now, if we can get the providers to list the city she is in or is visiting, or plans on visiting, I won't get pissed off or disappointed when I click on the ladies ad only to find out she is 300 fucking miles away. If we could get this accomplished, this would be the
Best.
Site.
Ever.

[Candyman007]

Most reviews come when provider is not in the area anymore.

[CryptKicker]

There are no rules saying what should be in the title of the review. As long as it does not violate the guidelines it is fine. Do we want the name of the provider and maybe the city? Yes. Will we reject a review if it's not in the title? No.

[Texanbychoice]

Originally Posted by Wallance

But the absolute worst? That is when someone fails to understand what GFE REALLY MEANS.

I heard JD can define GFE for ya Woody.

[john_deere]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

There are no rules saying what should be in the title of the review. As long as it does not violate the guidelines it is fine. Do we want the name of the provider and maybe the city? Yes. Will we reject a review if it's not in the title? No.

[busternutzs]

JD,

If I counted correctly 16 of your reviews out of 23 do not have the city in the title of the review.

This goes to my point with providers like Winter Monroe and Dakota Sterling they are both well know and well traveled. So putting the name of the city in the title serves little purpose.

And in the case of Whitney Marie which became famous in her time on ECCIE. Its was pretty much a given the review and session took place in Amarillo.

Even with a BP provider such as Sweet Adrianna you her review is going to come from El Paso.

[john_deere]

those statistics are true, but if you look at the pattern i think all of my last seven have the city in the title. that's because as i learned more i evolved to understand that it was good information to have. maybe it's different in safari, but when i hover over the review title i don't see the city.

but look… here's the bottom line… having the city in the review title improves the quality of information available to everyone using this resource. why the fuck would you even begin to argue against that? the benefits of doing it far outweigh the minor cost of one 10th of an extra second to type it in.

[BBQ-Guy]

Originally Posted by john_deere

bullshit. it does make it wrong in this area because it's a waste of fucking time to click on a review THEN find out the chick is 300 miles away.