Selling murdered baby parts for profit and other connected things

[southtown4488]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Whether I personally oppose SOME abortions or ALL abortions is irrelevant. What is relevant here is that an overwhelming majority (84%) of Americans DO oppose SOME abortions (i.e., late-term ones) but not ALL abortions. They think abortion should be legal - but strictly limited.

This is not a circus or a publicity stunt - you irresponsible, morally dead libtards brought it on yourselves by demanding UNLIMITED, taxpayer-funded abortion on demand. The reaction to the videos and the backlash against PP merely underscores how completely out of touch you are with the American public on this issue.



WRONG! Even the landmark Roe v. Wade decision (1973) you cite stated that fetuses are viable outside the womb at 24 weeks:

The United States Supreme Court stated in Roe v. Wade (1973) that viability (i.e., the "interim point at which the fetus becomes ... potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid") "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability.

Most Americans support Roe V Wade decision, most Americans support the womans right to choose, that's why mainstream Republicans don't go out of their way to talk about the issue, cause theyre afraid. . I agree that no constitutional right is without limits (same goes for the 2nd amendment). But the truth is the goal of anti-choice is to ban ALL abortions, they wont be happy until poor women get backroom abortions with wire hangers again, while rich women will simply fly to Canada. If Im a libtard, ur a republicunt.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by DSK

After the child is born, it is the responsibility of the mother and father to take care of the child, you socialist.

Why should I be responsible for the product of two losers who fuck each other and can't accept the consequences of their actions?

Should the government force you to build them a house to live in with the child?

So by this logic, you don't want it killed in the womb, but you're fine with it dying of hunger after it's popped out. Yeah, that makes fucking sense.

[dirty dog]

Originally Posted by southtown4488

But the truth is the goal of anti-choice is to ban ALL abortions,

The same can be said about the gun control movement.

[dirty dog]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

So by this logic, you don't want it killed in the womb, but you're fine with it dying of hunger after it's popped out. Yeah, that makes fucking sense.

No not at all but in your case I would make an exception.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Whether I personally oppose SOME abortions or ALL abortions is irrelevant. What is relevant here is that an overwhelming majority (84%) of Americans DO oppose SOME abortions (i.e., late-term ones) but not ALL abortions. They think abortion should be legal - but strictly limited.

This is not a circus or a publicity stunt - you irresponsible, morally dead libtards brought it on yourselves by demanding UNLIMITED, taxpayer-funded abortion on demand. The reaction to the videos and the backlash against PP merely underscores how completely out of touch you are with the American public on this issue.



WRONG! Even the landmark Roe v. Wade decision (1973) you cite stated that fetuses are viable outside the womb at 24 weeks:

The United States Supreme Court stated in Roe v. Wade (1973) that viability (i.e., the "interim point at which the fetus becomes ... potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid") "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability.

May! Cocksucker. May. Just like you MAY be a degenerate cunt or not. I vote yes. Potentially. May potentially be viable. That's different than ARE viable, which you stated. And that is talking about with artificial aid. Once again, you've been caught out. You've been measured and you've come up short. Go fuck off.

[WombRaider]

This message is hidden because dirty dog is on your ignore list.

I can't hear you, but I'm sure it was enlightening.

[WTF]

[IIFFOFRDB]

Murder is not high on the Ozombie priority list... fuckers... Monkey balls included

[WTF]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Murder is not high on the Ozombie priority list... fuckers... Monkey balls included

[lustylad]

D

Originally Posted by WombRaider

May! Cocksucker. May. Just like you MAY be a degenerate cunt or not. I vote yes. Potentially. May potentially be viable. That's different than ARE viable, which you stated. And that is talking about with artificial aid. Once again, you've been caught out. You've been measured and you've come up short. Go fuck off.

Did you read the link, you disgusting sewer rat? I'll post it again, just for you. Why don't you read it and tell us when YOU think a fetus becomes viable? There's plenty of data available regarding premature infant survival rates. We're dealing with a gradual continuum, not a black/white timeline. Of course we all know you suck at interpreting data and statistics, but have it cuntface. Like the Supreme Court, I picked 24 weeks because that's the point where over 50% of premies survive. If that doesn't work for you, tell us what does Mr. Wombhater.

"There is no sharp limit of development, age, or weight at which a human fetus automatically becomes viable. According to studies.... 50 to 70 percent of babies born at 24 to 25 weeks, and more than 90 percent born at 26 to 27 weeks, survive."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability

.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

D

. Like the Supreme Court, I picked 24 weeks because that's the point where over 50% of premies survive. If that doesn't work for you, tell us what does Mr. Wombhater.



.

What date do you pick for transferring tissue for medical research? What is the cut off date in weeks?

[slingblade]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hate the sin, not the sinner, dickhead. What kind of country, founded on the principle of religious liberty, would persecute you for your religious beliefs and force you out of business for practicing them?

A Country that is ran by any religion will do it to any other religion. That is who.
You mentioned "religious liberty" what does that mean to you? I suppose it means that whatever you think is right should be imposed on others.
By the way, I have a feeling that if you ask a First Nations citizen they will disagree on what this Country was founded on.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by slingblade

A Country that is ran (sic) by any religion will do it to any other religion. That is who.

Yes slinkyturd, a country that is "ran" (sic) by any religion is called a theocracy. What's your point - or do you even have one? Perhaps you didn't notice but here in the US we live in a free, pluralistic democratic society where freedom of religion and church-state separation are enshrined in the First Amendment. If that doesn't appeal to you and you would rather live under a theocracy, then move to Iran.

Originally Posted by slingblade

You mentioned "religious liberty" what does that mean to you? I suppose it means that whatever you think is right should be imposed on others.

No idiot, where did I say that? I'm not the one doing the imposing - you are. Unlike you, I believe in the First Amendment. That means I am perfectly willing to tolerate your ignorance and willfully stupid misstatements. I have full confidence that my compatriots will reject your attempts to shit all over the First Amendment and repeal the religious freedoms that our Founding Fathers cherished.

.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Perhaps you didn't notice but here in the US we live in a free, pluralistic democratic society...

You believe that shit!

[DSK]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

So by this logic, you don't want it killed in the womb, but you're fine with it dying of hunger after it's popped out. Yeah, that makes fucking sense.

I'm not at all fine with the poor baby starving to death after it is born. The fucking parents need to do everything they can to feed their own baby. If they don't, they should suffer the consequences, not the baby, and not me. However, I'm willing to have the public feed the child if the parents will accept it is shameful that they cannot provide for their baby. I've paid for my kids, other motherfucking assholes should do the same or suffer.