Quote:
Originally Posted by gimme_that
I agree with you totally as far as your whole quote, except the stringent part. That position isnt hard to do especially for dancers. It only requires a healthy back and agility in legs. It allows for more depth too during sex.
The lady has the option to brace her weight on a guys chest or have the guy hold and caress her butt while doing it to to limit the amount of time shes on her feet.
K9 and mish variations are cool but I can take all day to cum sometimes in those position. ACG "wraps it up " and gives me a break off my hands (mish)for overnights. Otherwise its just submissive, one sided sexual intercourse for me.
|
This puts a new gloss of things. I now understand that your preference is based upon ACG's ability to prompt your O, but I got to disagree that it's an easy position, "especially for dancers". A current favorite of mine is a former dancer, still in excellent trim, who has a bum knee. This limits her in normal CG and makes ACG impossible.
Maybe we have different concepts of ACG but the way I like it, the ladies are in full squat position and bear their complete body weight with their thighs. Unless you have thighs like a world-class skier such as Lindsey Vonn, the lactic acid has to build up pretty quickly and that must distract from the ladies' pleasure.
But there are anomalies. One young, lithe hottie in my area claims that she has her best O's from rear ACG. I can guarantee you, with her wonderful little ass, she would give me a resounding O just from the visuals. See for yourself.
http://www.taylortrashplaydate.com/photos.php#
Awl4knot
Bigal103
My Bio Page - Kansas City Metro
