Whose fault is it?

[pjorourke]

Alright, CT2005 wanted a democracy and a vote on whether things are his fault when YMMV adversely. So here is a poll.

The question on the floor is when you (a lady or a gent) don't have a good session, whose fault is it?

[discreetgent]

Did you want to set up a poll?

[pjorourke]

I did

[discreetgent]

Guess, I was in the thread before it showed up. Love option 4, bravo! lol

[charlestudor2005]

Originally Posted by pjorourke

Alright, CT2005 wanted a democracy and a vote on whether things are his fault when YMMV adversely. So here is a poll.

The question on the floor is when you (a lady or a gent) don't have a good session, whose fault is it?

Don't know why you did this. I already admitted it's my fault according to the posts in the other thread.

Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

I guess if this thread were a democracy, all of you would vote that anything negative that occurs in a session is my fault.

[pjorourke]

Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

Don't know why you did this.

Same reason I do most things -- for grins

[atlcomedy]

better watch it PJ...pretty soon he's going to start calling you and your ilk a "de facto mod" again

[PhantomofTheOpera]

Originally Posted by atlcomedy

better watch it PJ...pretty soon he's going to start calling you and your ilk a "de facto mod" again

No need for a "de facto mod" when we can wish for Pete Cochran, Linc Hayes, Adam Greer and bringing up the rear the way only she can, Julie Barnes. (I do so love the women's movement especially from behind!)

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera

No need for a "de facto mod" when we can wish for Pete Cochran, Linc Hayes, Adam Greer and bringing up the rear the way only she can, Julie Barnes. (I do so love the women's movement especially from behind!)

the mod squad...obscure references used to be the province of the literati

with the advent of tv now any old potato living in the past can throw stuff out there...i know..i do it too

[Chevalier]

Often, it's neither's fault.

1. If "YMMV" means that the lady deliberately provides reduced level of services, less than commonly understood or implied by her ads/reviews, for some clients based on factors commonly recognized as valid distinctions (hygiene, excessively rude manner, extreme obesity, etc.) -- his fault.
2. If "YMMV" means that the lady deliberately provides reduced level of services, less than commonly understood or implied by her ads/reviews, for some clients based on other factors (mild or moderate obesity, lack of social skills, age, etc.) -- her fault.
3. If "YMMV" means that the lady is noticeably unenthusiastic, due to the client not being polite, respectful, friendly -- his fault.
4. If "YMMV" means that the lady is noticeably unenthusiastic despite a polite, respectful, friendly demeanor by the client, evaluate as above for reduced level of services.
5. If "YMMV" means that she doesn't do X the way he prefers (and he doesn't provide polite feedback to that effect, allowing her to correct) -- neither's fault or possibly his fault.
6. If "YMMV" means that she doesn't do X the way he prefers (despite polite feedback to that effect) -- possibly her fault, depending on the nature of the difference.
7. If "YMMV" means that it's unscripted and, although the basics commonly understood to be available are all there, it's a little bit different each time -- why the hell are we talking about fault? That's a good thing.
8. If "YMMV" means that they just don't hit it off (personality differences) -- neither's fault.
9. If "YMMV" means that they hit it off better than average (client is not just clean, polite, respectful, friendly, but he and she have compatible personalities) -- why the hell are we talking about fault? That's a good thing.
10. If "YMMV" means that she just didn't do X the way he wants and/or they just don't hit it off and it happens a lot -- regardless of fault, he should consider whether he may have unreasonable expectations.

-----------

Most of my YMMV encounters fall into 7, 8, or 9. No fault to apportion. Not even to CT2005.

[Sa_artman]

I'm going to have to go with the last one.

[Laurentius]

Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

Don't know why you did this. I already admitted it's my fault according to the posts in the other thread.

Not EVERYONE in that thread said it is always the hobbyist's fault. I said it is a complex interplay. :-)

[pjorourke]

Originally Posted by Laurentius

Not EVERYONE in that thread said it is always the hobbyist's fault. I said it is a complex interplay. :-)

No, you are misreading the poll. Item 3 says it is Chuckles fault when YOU have a bad date.

[Laurentius]

Originally Posted by pjorourke

No, you are misreading the poll. Item 3 says it is Chuckles fault when YOU have a bad date.

LMAO!!!

[John Bull]

Originally Posted by atlcomedy

better watch it PJ...pretty soon he's going to start calling you and your ilk a "de facto mod" again

Yes and Chucky called me an idiot in the YMMV thread so what do you think he will call a de facto mod.