Are you still arguing this point? I thought I cleared this up for you when you PMed. Okay, let me spell it out for you.... again.
"A woman's desire for a man is inversely proportional the the size of penis/wallet."
Based on your sentence structure, you're pitting
desire against penis size and/or wallet size, not penis size against wallet size. So her
desire goes up as penis size and/or wallet size goes up. That would make them
directly proportional. You said
inversely proportional, which means her desire would go up as his penis size and/or wallet size went down, and vice versa.
I get what you
meant to say, but this is what you
did say. Have a nice day.