Obama Has Plenty of Time to Drop Biden

[Doove]

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

You left out a few circumstances surrounding this. With the VP's continued gaffes, there has been open speculation in Washington recently that the White House is considering dropping him from the ticket. And No, not just from Sarah Palin. If Romney continues to surge in the polls, Obama will get desperate and he will dump Biden regardless of what he now says. Also, why would the White House issue a statement after these meetings that they are sticking with Biden, if this issue was not discussed? Just a coincidence. Right? LMAO.

Open speculation by who? Right wing blogs? COG? You? Please.

And frankly, i wouldn't mind one bit if Clinton replaced Biden on the ticket. In fact, i'd welcome it. I just think your giddy conjecture is just silly. Especially when you all would flip out if it happened given how it would pretty much end the election in Obama's favor the moment it happened.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

Unless Obama has "compromising" photos.

Do you mean better than the one's the RNC has?

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by Doove

Open speculation by who? Right wing blogs? COG? You? Please.

And frankly, i wouldn't mind one bit if Clinton replaced Biden on the ticket. In fact, i'd welcome it. I just think your giddy conjecture is just silly. Especially when you all would flip out if it happened given how it would pretty much end the election in Obama's favor the moment it happened.

Open speculation by anyone who has half a brain. LOL. If Clinton did join the ticket, it would be a game changer (I will agree with you on that). So you don't think behind the scenes, they are not trying to twist her arm to get her to agree to do this when it would probably ensure Obama's reelection? You are naive, to say the least. Oh, that's right, you and CJ7 and all the other liberals on this board think that because Palin said this, that this is a bunch of right wing nonsense. LOL.

[Doove]

I don't know if Sarah Palin was the first to say it or not, and i don't care. Her comment is irrelevant to me. I'm commenting on the stupidity of assuming that a President meeting with his VP and Secretary of State is so rare that were it to occur 90 days from an election, it must mean they're discussing something other than foreign affairs.

[CuteOldGuy]

Please tell us, Doove, how many meetings have there been in the last, say, almost 4 years where the President, Vice-President and Secretary of State have met together, alone?

[Doove]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Please tell us, Doove, how many meetings have there been in the last, say, almost 4 years where the President, Vice-President and Secretary of State have met together, alone?

Burden of proof ain't on me.

But are you saying the answer would be zero? Or even, might be zero? As if they've never sat there in the Oval Office, just the three of them? Even informally?

That's a pretty absurd notion, don't you think?

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Please tell us, Doove, how many meetings have there been in the last, say, almost 4 years where the President, Vice-President and Secretary of State have met together, alone?

I give up, how many?

[CuteOldGuy]

Doove brought it up, figured he knew. Guess not.