Reviews: Good or Bad?
Reviews - some write them, some refuse, some can't write; some ladies want them, other's tolerate them, yet others will refuse to see you if you pen a description of your time together.
I've written more than a few reviews in my time as a hobbyist. Truth be told, it's a pain in the arse, and I don't enjoy it. I write them because I think it's important for other hobbyists to have access to recent information about a provider. Reviews serve as a large portion of our "screening" process. Almost as important as the review is the legitimacy of the reviewer. From a hobbyist perspective, generally I wouldn't even begin to consider scheduling with a provider who has no reviews, or has only two or three reviews by newbie posters, especially if she's been around for a while.
Trying to put myself into a pair of 6-inch heels (jk) and look at this from the provider's perspective, I can see why some ladies adopt a "no review" policy. After all, we always say what goes on BCD between consenting adults is no one else's business - yeah - right up until I write my very steamy review. Is requiring, or providing the "juicy details" too much? Would a list of "activities" suffice? Then again, a lot of ladies want recent quality reviews, especially if they're just getting started.
Please, chime in! What's your take on reviews?
|