Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakeuр
Heh Dove, you completely missed it again dude.
|
'Bout the only thing i've missed is your posting of the rule that you're relying on in suggesting Chloe should be banned. Seems i'm not the only one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakeuр
I'm sure the OP will sleep better at night BB knowing punishment has been doled out. The OP only ever wanted the person punished who gave out private information about her...now on to other matters and other punishments to be given out I guess...kind of ironic...
|
Looks like Make-up got punked. By, what he would call, a "hooktard". Kind of ironic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rooster69
This is a lie. Period. Assuming she is talking about the 4 Upstate NY Mods, of course (and I think that is a safe assumption).
|
Rooster, you really shouldn't claim something is a lie, then qualify it by suggesting it depends on whether or not there's something you don't know, then berate me for commenting on things while claiming i don't have the full story. It's bad form.
Quote:
|
Doove.... ya' really need to give this a rest, my friend. I have a lot of respect for you
|
And i, you.
Quote:
|
and I am probably taking a risk by calling you out a bit here.
|
Why would you say that? If you disagree with me on something, out with it.
Quote:
But it needs to be said. You have no PA and do not know all of the facts and all of the background (unless someone is feeding you "private" info!  ). I know that you have good intentions. But you are basing your comments in part on information given to you by a notoriously unreliable and biased witness. For those that know most of the facts, she is making you look kinda clueless.
|
I would suggest you go back and re-read my postings in the 2 threads. A few tangential comments to Jack and Anita notwithstanding, the bulk of my posts have dealt strictly with whether or not Chloe did something that rises to the level of her deserving to be banned. I'm a little curious as to what info you think i'm lacking that could impact my interpretation of forum rule #20.
Quote:
|
GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES, PEOPLE! Enough.
|
Good advice on it's face. But in my case, that would simply mean my going back to the National Sandbox. So...well....six of one/half dozen of the other, i suppose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
Doove, please stop typing with your toe's
|
When you stop talking with marbles in your mouth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
checkmate my ass
mmmm so you found a few threads in Houston to support your theory.
go back to Houston. (Supreme Directive) now search on that. All I know can be found in Houston as from a few posts I made there. Then was said by a Houston member Ban OSD. Links can also be found in ask the mods upset ny for links to Houston. I as op. your ignoring history, doomed to repeat. But in this case upset doomed to repeat for Houston.
|
OSD, i have no idea what you're talkin' about. So just stop.
