Church and State

[onawbtngr546]

https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...-faith-office/


that's illegal

[chizzy]

Ok ona, why do t u give us ur wisdom on how thats illegal

And if u just say separation of church and state, then u dont k ow what ur talking about

[Snafu412]

Originally Posted by chizzy

Ok ona, why do t u give us ur wisdom on how thats illegal

And if u just say separation of church and state, then u dont k ow what ur talking about

1st amendment establishment clause states that the state cannot favor one religion over another or establish a state religion!
Hence the separation of church and state!
So yes he is correct!

[Devo]

Originally Posted by Snafu412

1st amendment establishment clause states that the state cannot favor one religion over another or establish a state religion!
Hence the separation of church and state!
So yes he is correct!

AFAIK, I have not received orders from the government to join a particular religion.

[HDGristle]

They better permit the Satsnic Temple to be represented. And Muslims... among others.

Fuck Scientology tho

[Snafu412]

Originally Posted by Devo

AFAIK, I have not received orders from the government to join a particular religion.

What ona is talking about and what trump is doing is absolutely illegal.
It's not trumps house it's the people's house. It's federal property and the constitution applies!
We need another lawsuit!

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Snafu412

1st amendment establishment clause states that the state cannot favor one religion over another or establish a state religion!
Hence the separation of church and state!
So yes he is correct!

... President Trump is NOT favouring "one religion" -
He's showing favour to ALL religions! ...

Trump is a man to be admired! ... Winning! ...

#### Salty

[Snafu412]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... President Trump is NOT favouring "one religion" -
He's showing favour to ALL religions! ...

Trump is a man to be admired! ... Winning! ...


#### Salty

Yes we should all admire the traitorous criminal.
Your in a cult!

[onawbtngr546]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... President Trump is NOT favouring "one religion" -
He's showing favour to ALL religions! ...

Trump is a man to be admired! ... Winning! ...

#### Salty

Proof that you didn't read the document. It clearly says it is to target anti-semantic and anti-christian bias.


The government combating nazis is going to be quite difficult when the signal is coming from inside the white house, but I'm willing ti not debate how the current admin is full of nazis.


But the government combating anything that it is anti-christian is fucked up. They can't do this. It's illegal and violates the first amendment.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

Proof that you didn't read the document. It clearly says it is to target anti-semantic and anti-christian bias.


The government combating nazis is going to be quite difficult when the signal is coming from inside the white house, but I'm willing ti not debate how the current admin is full of nazis.


But the government combating anything that it is anti-christian is fucked up. They can't do this. It's illegal and violates the first amendment.

... You're WRONG yet-again... The Government CAN combat
anti-Christian attacks, threats and violence.
Just like it can with the anti-Israel attacks.

#### Salty

[Snafu412]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... You're WRONG yet-again... The Government CAN combat
anti-Christian attacks, threats and violence.
Just like it can with the anti-Israel attacks.

#### Salty

It already dose we have hate crimes statutes. That includes religion. This is just more bullshit from the horses ass! I seriously doubt that you can constitionally set up shit like that on federal property!
And you all say the the dems are always setting u bullshit agencies!
So keep waving your pompoms it's the one thing you do best, are you wearing a pleated skirt too?
Just curious.

[onawbtngr546]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... You're WRONG yet-again... The Government CAN combat
anti-Christian attacks, threats and violence.
Just like it can with the anti-Israel attacks.

#### Salty

FURTHER proof that you didn't read the document.


It says anti-christian BIAS. A geology book that says anything happened more than 6 thousand years ago can be considered anti-christian bias.

[Snafu412]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

FURTHER proof that you didn't read the document.


It says anti-christian BIAS. A geology book that says anything happened more than 6 thousand years ago can be considered anti-christian bias.

Apparently he hasn't read the constitution either!
That's OK the orange turd apparently is constitutionaly illerate too!