Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
If that’s true then you should be horrified by the President’s plans to turn the federal government from a meritocratic institution into a political patronage machine.
Federal employees are more often than not in their jobs because they have proficiency in skills and have passed rigorous performance standards.
I have not commented yet on this DEI topic because for the most part I agree with your stance on DEI programs in college.
I agree with the sentiment that good education in the US should require a diverse mix of students and teachers. I’m just not sure that DEI programs are the best option to get it. I also believe that some of the more vocal opponents of DEI use language that make them sound like assholes rather than rational reasoning people.
Of course the same sentiment applies to pro DEI activists as well. Assholes.
|
Thank you for most of that.
Ok. Please firsdt allow me a trivial quibble in the spirit of Bil Mhar or Jon Stewart:
I thought "the president" was still Joe Biden.
Federal employees and merit: I worked at a major Va hospital for 12 years (1991-2003) doing diagnostic imaging with isotopes
referred to as Nuclear Medicine. I worked with ten or so fello technologists. I was the only white guy in the department at my level. Most of my co-workers were competent, Several were defiantly not. In my time there we had three supervisors and two department directors (Doctors).
All of them tried to have two particular fellow employees discharged for incompetence and none of them could get it done due to the autocratic regulations, the union and JHR shit.
One other of my fellow technologists couldn't figure out what ten percent of anything was and always needed help with her work.
Don't tell me about a merit based federal workplace.
However, I am glad to see that we do agree on much of this. Merit based education and heiring should not be a political issue in my view.