Matt Gaetz for AG

[texassapper]

Clinton, Obama, and Biden have made recess appointments.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Jacky S

Is it Hitler or Fascist?

It can be confusing at times.

Obviously a lot of these things are confusing.

Enjoy the win. But frankly is not like the last time, when he tried to build a government that would work and then fired all the smart ones.

This time, he’s going straight to plaid. And you poor MAGAS will hve to make excuses for this piece of shit criminal for another year and a half. I predict he’ll die of some kind of medical issue in a 18 months.

Even shit decomposes after all.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

It may not matter. Trump is pushing the senate to defer their judgment in favor of his by allowing recess appointments.

From VOX.

President-elect Donald Trump is pushing for the next Senate majority leader to allow recess appointments, which would allow him to install some officials without Senate confirmation.

Typically, the Senate must approve presidential nominations for high-level posts, including cabinet positions, ambassadorships, and inspector general jobs, in a process outlined in the US Constitution. This procedure is meant to be a check on presidential power — a way of ensuring officials directly elected by citizens can guard against the appointment of unqualified or corrupt personnel.

The Constitution, however, also allows for “recess appointments,” a provision that aims to prevent prolonged government vacancies by allowing the president to install officials without Senate approval while Congress is not in session.

Using such recess appointments, Trump would be able to appoint whoever he’d like without giving the Senate the opportunity to question or object to the pick. Critics of the practice note that it increases the risk of unqualified, corrupt, or ideological appointees filling government posts. It also significantly expands presidential power.

Reinstating recess appointments “would essentially negate one of the Senate’s main roles in governance, which is to vet presidential nominations for high-level positions,” Peverill Squire, a political science professor at the University of Missouri, told Vox. “It would, if the Republicans in the Senate were willing to go along with it, represent sort of an abdication; they would be simply giving up the power that’s afforded them.”

Trump injected his demand into the fierce race to replace Sen. Mitch McConnell as the leader of the Senate, which will be under GOP control next session thanks to the results of last week’s election. Trump largely stayed out of that contest while on the campaign trail, but he waded into it on Sunday, writing on X, “Any Republican Senator seeking the coveted LEADERSHIP position in the United States Senate must agree to Recess Appointments (in the Senate!)”

The three candidates for the position — Sens. John Thune (South Dakota), John Cornyn (Texas), and Rick Scott (Florida) — quickly expressed support for Trump’s demand. Scott, the underdog in the race who is also the closest Trump ally of the three, was the most explicit in his endorsement of the plan, writing “100% agree. I will do whatever it takes to get your nominations through as quickly as possible,” on X.

Read the full article here: https://www.vox.com/politics/384356/...cornyn-cabinet

... Thanks for posting this, mate.
It's a fair-minded explanation.

#### Salty

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

It may not matter. Trump is pushing the senate to defer their judgment in favor of his by allowing recess appointments...

Actually, I think it works backwards. The President has the Constitutional power, but the Senate has to leave a enough people in place, i.e. at work, to make it not technically in recess, which would be akin to poking them in the eye. Surely the Dems would do that to a GOP President, but not their own, if they were in the majority - but they ain't.

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

From VOX.

President-elect Donald Trump is pushing for the next Senate majority leader to allow recess appointments, which would allow him to install some officials without Senate confirmation.

Typically, the Senate must approve presidential nominations for high-level posts, including cabinet positions, ambassadorships, and inspector general jobs, in a process outlined in the US Constitution. This procedure is meant to be a check on presidential power — a way of ensuring officials directly elected by citizens can guard against the appointment of unqualified or corrupt personnel.

The Constitution, however, also allows for “recess appointments,” a provision that aims to prevent prolonged government vacancies by allowing the president to install officials without Senate approval while Congress is not in session.

Using such recess appointments, Trump would be able to appoint whoever he’d like without giving the Senate the opportunity to question or object to the pick. Critics of the practice note that it increases the risk of unqualified, corrupt, or ideological appointees filling government posts. It also significantly expands presidential power.

Reinstating recess appointments “would essentially negate one of the Senate’s main roles in governance, which is to vet presidential nominations for high-level positions,” Peverill Squire, a political science professor at the University of Missouri, told Vox. “It would, if the Republicans in the Senate were willing to go along with it, represent sort of an abdication; they would be simply giving up the power that’s afforded them.”

Trump injected his demand into the fierce race to replace Sen. Mitch McConnell as the leader of the Senate, which will be under GOP control next session thanks to the results of last week’s election. Trump largely stayed out of that contest while on the campaign trail, but he waded into it on Sunday, writing on X, “Any Republican Senator seeking the coveted LEADERSHIP position in the United States Senate must agree to Recess Appointments (in the Senate!)”

The three candidates for the position — Sens. John Thune (South Dakota), John Cornyn (Texas), and Rick Scott (Florida) — quickly expressed support for Trump’s demand. Scott, the underdog in the race who is also the closest Trump ally of the three, was the most explicit in his endorsement of the plan, writing “100% agree. I will do whatever it takes to get your nominations through as quickly as possible,” on X.

Read the full article here: https://www.vox.com/politics/384356/...cornyn-cabinet

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

...From above, a President elect who has already started God level trolling.

Well... that's coming from a Democrat, so there is that. I wonder if Xwitter is gonna censor Trump's mean tweets?