Liberal Joe Rogan endorsed Trump!!!!

[HDGristle]

That one still tickles me. Thanks for proving my point, tho

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

YR doesn't care.

I picked the perfect link, btw. It achieved everything I wanted it to. And I forced you to read.

you sure? you proved him wrong.

Originally Posted by bambino

You obviously do

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=3008612

BAHAHAHA

he only cares about his opinions and everyone else who has an opinion he doesn't agree with is .. "worthless"


sounds like the Democrats to me

[HDGristle]

100% confident I didn't intend to agree with or back up YR. Rogan is a flaming lib

You seem confused

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

100% confident I didn't intend to agree with or back up YR. Rogan is a flaming lib

You seem confused

someone else seems confused

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

LOLLING! Rogan is about as liberal as you are.

Don’t know what all the other cut and pasted tweets have to do with Rogan, but I’m sure you do.

[HDGristle]

Hey, maybe Bam's a closet lib. He and Joe do share a lot of common viewpoints and he's super fucking elated that Rogan endorsed Trump

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Hey, maybe Bam's a closet lib. He and Joe do share a lot of common viewpoints and he's super fucking elated that Rogan endorsed Trump

you and YR should be concerned. Rogan has millions of viewers.


JD Vance also appeared on Rogan's show. where was Harris and Walz?


Trump got over 45 million views. Vance got 14 million. 59 MILLION combined


Harris/Walz ... ZERO


bahahahaa

[HDGristle]

I'm not. Especially when you folks keep telling me that endorsements don't matter. Views aren't votes. And views aren't U.S. specific, either.

Finding lots of lulz tho

That's like telling me Tucker views on X means votes to tally in the bag. We both know better

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

I'm not. Especially when you folks keep telling me that endorsements don't matter. Views aren't votes. And views aren't U.S. specific, either.

Finding lots of lulz tho

That's like telling me Tucker views on X means votes to tally in the bag. We both know better

views matter. 59 million of them. especially in a dead heat election.

[HDGristle]

Views only matter if they lead to votes, change votes or discourage votes.

You don't have anything causal or correlative. We really do need to wait and see. Can you strip out overseas views? Isolate on views by registered U.S. voters only? Identify votes that were specifically influenced?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Views only matter if they lead to votes, change votes or discourage votes.

You don't have anything causal or correlative. We really do need to wait and see. Can you strip out overseas views? Isolate on views by registered U.S. voters only? Identify votes that were specifically influenced?

well let's see .. how many views of nothing lead to votes versus 59 MILLION views?


bahahahaa

[HDGristle]

How many of those views are real people, registered to vote, who know and care about the endorsement and plan to vote tomorrow?

What if they already voted?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

How many of those views are real people, registered to vote, who know and care about the endorsement and plan to vote tomorrow?

amusing. 59 million russkie bot views. is that your opinion?

Harris and Walz are both pussies and refuse to do any meaningful unscripted interviews.


we all know why

[HDGristle]

Strike 1

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

59 MILLION strike outs for Harris/Walz

ftfy

[HDGristle]

Strike 2. You gonna have exit polling to see who was influenced by viewing the interviews and by the endorsement?