Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
did Harris ever once give a direct answer to a direct question?
Nope.
who was panicking and waving off the interview to end? not Bret Baier. her campaign wanted her to stop.
ask yerself why? "IF" she was doing so great being "brave" against the "Meanie "Bret Baier"?
|
Does the orange one? Best direct response of late from him was "I have concepts of a plan" in reference to ACA. Guy has had nearly a decade to complete a comprehensive plan. Love how y'all give a hall pass to his endless off point ramblings but you'll be hypocritical of the other side.
And where did I say Bret was mean? I only stated she didn't complain about the interview. I would be a hypocrite if I said she whined about it like your boy does everything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
Actually, he interrupted so an answer COULD be given. How else do you stop her from filibustering the entire interview with non-answers?
Put yourself in Baier's shoes. If you let her babble on, you never hear an answer. If you redirect her back to the original question, you get accused of being rude. Fuck that. Bret's a real journalist. He did the right thing.
|
And the Big Cheato rambling about windmills, whales, flush toilets is not anwering directly?
See statement above about giving donny a hall pass and holding a whole other set of criteria for others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by farmstud60
Harris was rambling and changing the subject on a basic question. Only a total fool thought she was going to actually say anything worth while
|
See above for the melange one.
Now, no one has given a link to where I asked for an interview with trump where, as someone stated, "... he interrupted so an answer COULD be given. How else do you stop him from filibustering the entire interview with non-answers?"
Still waiting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain
Perhaps so but look how well that worked out for Clinton. If people are on the fence, they need something to push them over it. IMO, she has given them nothing but the exact same shit in all of her interviews. People want to hear more details from her, and she refuses to give it to them. She claims to be the underdog in the race, so she should act like one. Instead, to me, she is like watching a gerbil running on a wheel and going nowhere when I hear her speak now.
She has all of the financial resources and pretty much everything else she needs to win this election. What she doesn't have is enough substance to win this election IMO. I wouldn't have thought that a few weeks ago but now I do because nothing has changed with her vague and boring delivery.
|
You are correct on that. Lawyers respond differently to questions than normal people. As do people in the intelligence community. And I can see how it would turn people off.
Was watching Lincoln the other night. Had to do the double with Birth of a Nation as the first movie. Licoln, being a lawyer himself, surely had the same issues. But I like how they portrayed the guy in handling a country divided like we seem to be today.
And the opening and closing with Defense Sec Gates had pretty good insight about such divisions in our country.
