Encounter: TS Jada - Pounded Me Good

[dfwtsfan]

Date: 05/21/2023
Name: TS Jada
User ID: doesn't have one
Phone: 469-516-8945
Email Address: -
URL / Website: https://www.tsescorts.com/texas/dall...s/469-516-8945
City: Dallas
State: Texas
Address: 635 & Luna
Activities: LK, DATO, CFS/Doggy, Face Fucked, CIM, BBBJ, HJ w/Prostate Massage
Hair Length and Color: Black and Long
Age: 40's
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: Thai ladyboy, 5'6", 130, pretty and feminine, nice body and completely hairless, has about 5-6” circumcised cock that stays hard and cums, A cups, nice lingerie
Recommendation: Yes

[baldbrotha1]

This is so gay...smh

[bikebuilder]

Wtf

[GL page]

Oh here we go again. Mad props to you dfwtsfan for continuing to post your reviews notwithstanding the judgemental people here. I’m not into men or trans but I do enjoy your reviews. I don’t think anyone in this hobby has a right to judge others’ proclivities

[baldbrotha1]

Lol! Judgement? Two men having sex is the definition of gay! You voiced your opinion I voiced mine.If a man enjoys reading how 2 men had sex, maybe you're not being honest with yourself. Just saying! Lmao

[dfwtsfan]

baldbrotha - You're right, two men having sex is gay, and I'm not into men. So calm down, I promise you'll never see me posting reviews of men

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_woman

[KIMCHICONNIESEWER]

BBFS on the menu?

[KIMCHICONNIESEWER]

Originally Posted by dfwtsfan

Date: 05/21/2023
Name: TS Jada
User ID: doesn't have one
Phone: 469-516-8945
Email Address: -
URL / Website: https://www.tsescorts.com/texas/dall...s/469-516-8945
City: Dallas
State: Texas
Address: 635 & Luna
Activities: LK, DATO, CFS/Doggy, Face Fucked, CIM, BBBJ, HJ w/Prostate Massage
Hair Length and Color: Black and Long
Age: 40's
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: Thai ladyboy, 5'6", 130, pretty and feminine, nice body and completely hairless, has about 5-6” circumcised cock that stays hard and cums, A cups, nice lingerie
Recommendation: Yes

How many roses (PM is fine)

[baldbrotha1]

Dfwtsfan - brother I appreciate the reassurance, but if the other person you're having sex with has the same sexual organ, it's gay. Lipstick on a pig don't change it's a pig! The lipstick is an attempt to mentally appease the mind about the "real" act. Just my opinion.

[dfwtsfan]

Originally Posted by GL page

Oh here we go again. Mad props to you dfwtsfan for continuing to post your reviews notwithstanding the judgmental people here. I’m not into men or trans but I do enjoy your reviews.

Thanks. Unfortunately it seems like baldbrotha (and usually a couple of his dog piling cohorts on here),are always on a mission to harass trans reviewers, in an effort to shame them and run them off of ECCIE. Or maybe he's scared some of his hetero buddies on here will read a review like this, especially the ones that might be getting a little burned out on pussy (like happened to me years ago), try a trans escort, find out how much fun it is, and switch teams lol.

The interesting flip side of all this, ECCIE ownership/administration allows trans reviews, and allows them in this forum. So who's the higher authority on that, baldbrotha or the owners/admins? Let's also not forget that ECCIE is so trans friendly, that it allows tsescorts.com to place ads on ECCIE, see "Dallas Shemales" at the top of each page. I don't see ECCIE allowing ads for "Dallas Gay Men". If baldbrotha doesn't like trans reviews here, or that ECCIE kind of supports the trans community with escort ads, he should take that up with ECCIE owners/admins and PM them, not bash the reviewers that are just doing what ECCIE allows. IMO, he's wasting his time doing all that trans shaming on here with reviewers, and should take up his anti-trans review agenda with ECCIE owners/admins.

Originally Posted by GL page

I don’t think anyone in this hobby has a right to judge others’ proclivities

I agree. That's what ECCIE owners/admins seem to be about too and baldbrotha just doesn't seem to understand that. His trans review rage and shaming is misplaced. Trans hobbyists are just doing what ECCIE allows, by posting trans reviews, and baldbrotha seems to hate that ECCIE allows that, and instead of being man enough to take that up with admins/owners, he picks on reviewers in a back handed sort of way. It makes me sort of wonder in what other ways and situations baldbrotha ties to harass or abuse certain types of people, or groups of them, to undermine authority and achieve his personal agenda/hate.

[mrredcat43]

WALDT. Disregard the negative comments in the peanut gallery

[dfwtsfan]

Originally Posted by baldbrotha1

Dfwtsfan - brother I appreciate the reassurance, but if the other person you're having sex with has the same sexual organ, it's gay. Lipstick on a pig don't change it's a pig! The lipstick is an attempt to mentally appease the mind about the "real" act. Just my opinion.

At one time in our society, years or decades ago, gay and trans might've been grouped together. In many areas in which there are groupings of people, including many governmental entities, the two have been separated. Even on porn sites and with porn companies, trans and gay are often separate categories. I'm onboard with that, as are many other people, and I understand you're not, and that's fine. Sometimes it takes time before certain people realize and accept there's distinct groupings of people. Here's one for you, I don't see ECCIE allowing "gay" reviews (men on men), but ECCIE does allow "trans" reviews. Do you see a difference in the two? Have you ever thought or realized that you might be viewing things a little different than other people?

[urzatron]

Just ignore the troll. He's enjoying his feeding and needs to be starved.

[7aurelius]

Ahh… I see one of the good old timeless battles has reconvened again…


Best policy for this has always been

“not my monkey, not my circus”

[Aonegonexx]

Originally Posted by 7aurelius

Ahh… I see one of the good old timeless battles has reconvened again…


Best policy for this has always been

“not my monkey, not my circus”

Agree. I am not gonna question his preferences or anybody's preferences for that matter, but here is what I wonder. His handle has TS in it, all his reviews are TS, his gallery, avatar, signatures, everything is about TS. And all his reviews are these long ass reviews going into graphic details. So i think he likes to stir up the hornet's nest. Better would be keep it short and simple, sharing at information level otherwise it sounds like he is asking for trouble or seeking attention :-).