SUPREME Hypocrites

[berryberry]

Democratic senators who enthusiastically touted baseless rape allegations against Brett Kavanaugh are now suddenly worried the other party isn’t “respectful” of their SCOTUS nominee.

Being tarred and feathered would be too nice for these fucking hypocrites

[Devo]

Much like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she does not belong on the court, both were activists first, and not jurists.

Further the exclusion of white, brown and yellow humans is racist and illegal.

[berryberry]

Sen. Hawley Exposes Biden SCOTUS Pick’s Long History of Treating Sex Offenders Leniently

You will have to find the link yourself as part of what this judge nominated by Senile Biden to the Supreme Court has done can't be mentioned due to the rules of this site

[berryberry]

Never forget the Dems sent in this guy to say Kavanaugh ran a gang rape crew and the media ran with it

[berryberry]

Jonathon Turley - MSNBC commentator and Nation’s Justice Correspondent Elie Mystal recently accused Sen. Josh Hawley of trying to kill Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. His weapon: a question about her prior legal positions...

[berryberry]

After claiming that Kavanaugh was the ringleader of a roving gang of serial rapists, and accusing Barrett of belonging to a secret Handmaid's Tale cult, the Democrats are now concerned that Republicans are treating their SCOTUS nominee unfairly

[berryberry]

[BTHUDER99]

Originally Posted by Devo

Much like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she does not belong on the court, both were activists first, and not jurists.

Am I missing sarcasm here?

[HDGristle]

No, don't think you are. Pretty sure he doesn't think RBG belonged on the court

[Devo]

Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

Am I missing sarcasm here?

Gburg was an attorney for planned parenthood, how can someone who worked for the countries largest provider of abortions not show bias in a case involving that?

If someone was an Attorney for the NRA, you think there would be a question about a pro gun bias?

Of course there would be.

This lousy candidate, is so biased, Pro CRT, Pro 1619, anti following sentencing guidlines, that its clear she could never be fair as a SCOTUS judge.




And Gristle, do I answer questions directed at you?

No, I fucking don't, so, please don't assume and answer for me in the future.

[HDGristle]

Shared my thoughts. They were confirmed.

Pretty sure she's getting confirmed, too

[BTHUDER99]

Originally Posted by Devo

Gburg was an attorney for planned parenthood, how can someone who worked for the countries largest provider of abortions not show bias in a case involving that?

All the justices have biases... most of the time that's the reason they're even nominated. If they didn't have biases why would we even note which ones were conservative/liberal leaning?

Now can a justice make a decision based on the law should be the question which is why we have these hearings. Over the last 30 years, RBG had the greatest confirmation margin so maybe you should complain to one of those people about her "bias."

[berryberry]

You know Affirmative Action is a profoundly flawed policy when a nominee, who only got the interview because of her sex and race, can't even answer the "what is a woman" question.

[Devo]

Originally Posted by BTHUDER99

All the justices have biases... most of the time that's the reason they're even nominated. If they didn't have biases why would we even note which ones were conservative/liberal leaning?

Now can a justice make a decision based on the law should be the question which is why we have these hearings. Over the last 30 years, RBG had the greatest confirmation margin so maybe you should complain to one of those people about her "bias."

That used to be the way the SCOTUS worked, they picked candidates and both sides approved them.

Now, your side is dragging loony tunes out of the woodwork to make baseless accusations against any R male candidate, and I was surprised they didn't bring in a High School basketball team that claimed they gang banged ACB, while she was in high school.

Then look at todays hearings where the spineless R's won't treat this candidate the same way, when its clear she's overly biased, lying, and/or just stupid.

Not being able to define a woman, is bullshit, that alone should exclude her, because she has to be lying about that.

You don't have to be a doctor to understand only woman make babies.

[BTHUDER99]

Originally Posted by Devo

Now, your side is dragging loony tunes out of the woodwork to make baseless accusations against any R male candidate, and I was surprised they didn't bring in a High School basketball team that claimed they gang banged ACB, while she was in high school.

Give me a break. Roberts, Alito, and Gorsuch were all confirmed without any allegations. Thomas would have been too except for a leaked interview right before the vote. So maybe it's not a witch hunt against any R male candidate. You can't even say it's biased against R males in particular because the dems only nominated 2 males in that time period and only one got a hearing.

Funny you bring up looney tunes considering that Mr. Zodiac Killer was the one to bring children's books to a confirmation hearing.