Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70831
biomed163764
Yssup Rider61304
gman4453377
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48840
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37431
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-22-2021, 11:38 AM   #16
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Hillary wasn't elected, Chung.
No shit. and she didn't get my vote. Her Husband would have, had he run against Trump. And yes, he could have. He is only forbidden to serve two CONSECUTIVE terms as President.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 11:41 AM   #17
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
Her Husband would have, had he run against Trump. And yes, he could have. He is only forbidden to serve two CONSECUTIVE terms as President.
People know him now. His sex entertainment provider killed himself....it is alleged. Not to mention his Russian speaking engagements ... and his documented perjury .... his flaws are overwhelming. He couldn't even get Hillary elected.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 11:44 AM   #18
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,241
Encounters: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
No shit. and she didn't get my vote. Her Husband would have, had he run against Trump. And yes, he could have. He is only forbidden to serve two CONSECUTIVE terms as President.
No, a person can not have 3 terms as president consecutive or not. Only exception is if a VP takes over, then they can be elected for two terms after.

https://constitutioncenter.org/inter...amendment-xxii
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 11:54 AM   #19
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
No, a person can not have 3 terms as president consecutive or not. Only exception is if a VP takes over, then they can be elected for two terms after.

https://constitutioncenter.org/inter...amendment-xxii
Kamala in 2024, Bill Clinton for Vice President!

That will rile a few folks on this Forum, LOL
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 12:11 PM   #20
VitaMan
Premium Access
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,572
Encounters: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
bullshit story. claiming he did this or that isn't evidence. just made up gossip. where's the evidence of this.

Exactly what is needed for the Trump fraud election claims


Trump was also on his go to channel Fox twice in 12 hours, with his go to commentator Hannity, making unprovable claims about how Afghanistan would be going if he were still around.....wait....he is still around....not much of a statesman for the US


He just loves being on tv
VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 12:22 PM   #21
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Fuck. Biden, Trump, what’s the difference. I was blaming this on State Department career officials. Then it comes out that they were shouting from the rooftop last month that we were on the verge of a royal cluster fuck in Afghanistan but the White House wasn’t listening. Now it looks like a big part of the reason the translators et al are waiting in Afghanistan to be slaughtered is because of Miller’s and Trump’s xenophobia.

Here’s another data point. Biden complained about how Trump botched the pullout from Syria, when we screwed the Kurds who helped us defeat ISIS. Maybe true but ironic as hell considering what’s happening now. It’s Syria times ten.

There are 330 million Americans. Yet we haven’t elected a competent president since Clinton, or an outstanding one since Reagan. The electorate is just plain stupid.

The Trump administration at least has a political excuse. It’s strongest supporters have no problem leaving the Afghans who had our backs in Afghanistan to be slaughtered. Just look at the paranoia among some of our posters here who believe terrorists will slip into the USA and create sleeper cells. The Biden administration has no excuse - just sheer incompetence.

Biden’s criticism of Trump’s Syrian withdrawal:

https://apnews.com/article/761d315d0...c5fb377d8340a1

Pence staffer’s original criticism of Miller and Trump for slow walking Afghan visas, since Bambino doesn’t trust Business Insider:


https://mobile.twitter.com/OliviaTro...40865665679361



Tiny you obviously hate Trump - but his results for the economy, for a peaceful country, and keeping terrorism under control - Far Surpass the incompetent DPST fiden.

yet the blinded ideologues keep up their Trump fixation adn hatred.



At the conclusion of teh Chicom DPST foibles, when you are forced to kowtow to Comrade Xi - Tiny - 'what will you feel about that????
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 12:23 PM   #22
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaMan View Post
Exactly what is needed for the Trump fraud election claims


Trump was also on his go to channel Fox twice in 12 hours, with his go to commentator Hannity, making unprovable claims about how Afghanistan would be going if he were still around.....wait....he is still around....not much of a statesman for the US

Chicom DPSTs do love their Voter fraud - it keeps them and their marxist manifesto around.

Better get HR-1 passed - vitamin - or Else!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 12:26 PM   #23
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
No shit. and she didn't get my vote. Her Husband would have, had he run against Trump. And yes, he could have. He is only forbidden to serve two CONSECUTIVE terms as President.



CT - chicom DPSTs are not known as Constitutional scholars - but One could at least try to read and comprehend.
Foolish haters of teh Constitution, bill of Rights, and Equality for All Under teh Law!!


https://constitutioncenter.org/inter...amendment-xxii



22nd Amendment

Two-Term Limit on Presidency

Passed by Congress March 21, 1947. Ratified February 27, 1951
Section 1

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.


Section 2

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.


Read Interpretations of the 22nd Amendment


Clear Enough - CT????????????
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 05:34 PM   #24
HedonistForever
Valued Poster
 
HedonistForever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 31, 2019
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 5,667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Fuck. Biden, Trump, what’s the difference. I was blaming this on State Department career officials. Then it comes out that they were shouting from the rooftop last month that we were on the verge of a royal cluster fuck in Afghanistan but the White House wasn’t listening. Now it looks like a big part of the reason the translators et al are waiting in Afghanistan to be slaughtered is because of Miller’s and Trump’s xenophobia.

Here’s another data point. Biden complained about how Trump botched the pullout from Syria, when we screwed the Kurds who helped us defeat ISIS. Maybe true but ironic as hell considering what’s happening now. It’s Syria times ten.

There are 330 million Americans. Yet we haven’t elected a competent president since Clinton, or an outstanding one since Reagan. The electorate is just plain stupid.

The Trump administration at least has a political excuse. It’s strongest supporters have no problem leaving the Afghans who had our backs in Afghanistan to be slaughtered. Just look at the paranoia among some of our posters here who believe terrorists will slip into the USA and create sleeper cells. The Biden administration has no excuse - just sheer incompetence.

Biden’s criticism of Trump’s Syrian withdrawal:

https://apnews.com/article/761d315d0...c5fb377d8340a1

Pence staffer’s original criticism of Miller and Trump for slow walking Afghan visas, since Bambino doesn’t trust Business Insider:


https://mobile.twitter.com/OliviaTro...40865665679361

Now that is something all reasonable people could agree with but with most of the media and many of the politicians lying to to us on a daily basis, the average American doesn't know what to believe.
HedonistForever is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 05:53 PM   #25
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 23,152
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
Kamala in 2024, Bill Clinton for Vice President!

That will rile a few folks on this Forum, LOL
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 07:06 PM   #26
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,241
Encounters: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

Even Wikipedia, a left leaning organization rates your fact checkers as amateurish!!!!!!! What a surprise!!!! Epic fail. Try Snopes.

I just fact checked your fact checker. Back to the drawing board. You remind me of Wiley E Coyote.
So bad that the idiots at MIT used it to train AI.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 07:27 PM   #27
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
Kamala in 2024, Bill Clinton for Vice President!

That will rile a few folks on this Forum, LOL

What that really means - is effectively Hillary for POTUS - an evil, vicious , back-biting hag.

CT has not figured out Willie is not eligible for POTUS.

Whether he is eligible for VP - i would like to see the SC debate that One.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 07:28 PM   #28
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
So bad that the idiots at MIT used it to train AI.
Media Bias/Fact Check
Now I understand YOUR LACK of understanding of reality!!!


Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by editor Dave Van Zandt.[1] The website has been described as an amateur effort to rate news media sources based on factual accuracy and political bias.[2]

Media Bias/Fact Check
Media Bias Fact Check wordmark.png
Founded
2015; 6 years ago
Headquarters
Greensboro, North Carolina
Owner
Dave Van Zandt[1]
URL
mediabiasfactcheck.com Edit this at Wikidata
Current status
Active

Chart showing the degree of bias rating given to CNN
Sites are rated on a 0–10 scale by Van Zandt and his team using categories such as biased wording and headlines, factuality and sourcing, and story choices.[2]

The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst".[2] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[3]

The site has been used by researchers at the University of Michigan to create a tool called the "Iffy Quotient", which draws data from Media Bias/Fact Check and NewsWhip to track the prevalence of "fake news" and questionable sources on social media.[4][5] The site was also used by a research group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in initial training of an AI to fact check and detect the bias on a website.[6][7]
bb1961 is offline   Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 07:30 PM   #29
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

IMHO - Business Insider - is no longer about Business - and not an Insider - it i a radical leftists propaganda rag on a pat with the worst of Xinn, NY crimes, and Comrade Xi propaganda.
'r' only cites propaganda BS - never anything factual.

same as most of teh DPST chicom proletariat
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved