No charges for Ashli Babbitt’s killer

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Oh Please, If someone tried to break into my house I'd probably shoot them too. I'm very surprised that more shots weren't fired.

You don't understand. The RWWs want the police to check voter registration cards before deciding to shoot or not. The hypocrisy on here is very thick. You need to understand that Trump supporters, Q-nuts, and the like have a free pass to do almost anything--according to some here. Get that part right, and many posts here start to make sense.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

a persons home is a much different situation and there is no comparison to a public building

a very weak post indeed

Nope.

Just try breaking into a missile silo for example. Or a bank. Or an armory. Or the White House.

Any bets on life expectancy?

[Little Monster]

Originally Posted by reddog1951

"She was unarmed. You prove she was going to kill someone. Go ahead, try it."

George Floyd was unarmed as well and as best I can tell not trying to kill anyone, nor participating in mob violence directed against a bastion of democracy. Nor was Duante Wright.

Bunch of hippocrites here, justifying actions on their favored side. Sorry, but the first person to illegally enter the capital that day should have been shot dead on the spot....and may have been if secret service was involved. She just drew the short straw. Actions by all who entered are inexcusable, an affront to democracy, and should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

Red you are 100% correct. Conservative hypocrisy runs deep. First they tried to make up a bs story that it was antifa that rioted, when that lie got laughed at and disproven now they're trying to play the victim. It's always different when something like that happens to someone on "their" side. They always have an excuse. The fact is she was a part of a mob that was threatening the lives of people and security was not about to ask the rioters if they could please hold on for a second so they can watch the video and find out who said what.

Had the rioters been from the left then you already know that the same posters who are in here whining about her death would be saying that she deserved it. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest.

George Floyd was not armed which is why his murderer is on his way to prison for the rest of his life where he belongs. Ahmaud Arbery was not armed which is why his murderers are being held without bail until they get convicted then they will get put where they belong.

[Little Monster]

Originally Posted by bambino

Floyd was a criminal. Babbit was a veteran. Floyd resisted arrest, Babbit was shot without warning. Are you really trying to make an argument here? From past posts, you’re not very good at it.

Just because someone is a vet doesn't give them the right to break the law, and break into buildings along side people who are threatening to commit murder.

And the fact that you had to throw in one of your usual childish put downs tells me even you know you're wrong (again)

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Little Monster

She wasn't a protester, she was a criminal trying to kill certain politicians just because she couldn't handle the fact that her hero got his ass beat.

i'm quite sure you consider all of the rioters for BLM/Antifa to be "patriots" don't ya?


they are rioters just the same as people at the Capitol were.

[reddog1951]

Waco logic. The riotors (as you called them) at the capital intentionally disrupted constitutionally proper government action. They also threatened the lives, explicitly or implicitedly of lawfully elected representatives of the People (gallow, if nothing else). They crossed a line that others have not and shouldn't be tolerated.

[Little Monster]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

i'm quite sure you consider all of the rioters for BLM/Antifa to be "patriots" don't ya?


they are rioters just the same as people at the Capitol were.

If their sole purpose for getting together was to break into a place and threaten people's lives like the far right Trump supporters did, then yes you would be right.

If they are defending themselves from far right agitators and the police who are taking the side of the agitators, then no you would be wrong. They are not "rioters"

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Nope.

Just try breaking into a missile silo for example. Or a bank. Or an armory. Or the White House.

Any bets on life expectancy?

Well weve seen what happens when you are a reprobate who does illegal [forbidden topic] all while having covid then fighting and resisting arrest!
No matter what the dude was dead that day!

I say suicide by cop!!!!!!!!

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by Old-T

You don't understand. The RWWs want the police to check voter registration cards before deciding to shoot or not. The hypocrisy on here is very thick. You need to understand that Trump supporters, Q-nuts, and the like have a free pass to do almost anything--according to some here. Get that part right, and many posts here start to make sense.

I bet it sucks when that gonorrhea starts to affect your mind.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by Little Monster

If their sole purpose for getting together was to break into a place and threaten people's lives like the far right Trump supporters did, then yes you would be right.

If they are defending themselves from far right agitators and the police who are taking the side of the agitators, then no you would be wrong. They are not "rioters"

"Far right" do you have any proof that someone is more that just "right"? So which TV station do you work for making stuff up? Shame about that one guy who said he was the king of Antifa.

[Little Monster]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

"Far right" do you have any proof that someone is more that just "right"? So which TV station do you work for making stuff up? Shame about that one guy who said he was the king of Antifa.

In what way did I make anything up?

[GastonGlock]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

"Far right" do you have any proof that someone is more that just "right"? So which TV station do you work for making stuff up? Shame about that one guy who said he was the king of Antifa.

Everyone he disagrees with are Trump supporters in his mind.

[Little Monster]

Originally Posted by GastonGlock

Everyone he disagrees with are Trump supporters in his mind.

Ok, so now we're gonna start shifting arguments?

The Jan 6th rioters were waiving Trump flags and wearing MAGA hats, that sir is a fact. Both QAnon advocates and Proud Boy members have been arrested in connection with the rioting another fact. Both QAnon and Proud Boys are "far right" organizations, another fact.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by Little Monster

Ok, so now we're gonna start shifting arguments?

The Jan 6th rioters were waiving Trump flags and wearing MAGA hats, that sir is a fact. Both QAnon advocates and Proud Boy members have been arrested in connection with the rioting another fact. Both QAnon and Proud Boys are "far right" organizations, another fact.

Minor technicalities, all. You still don't get it, do you?

--If it is something that supports Trump, RWWs, neo-Confederacy ideology, Q-anon, racist views disguised as "law and order" or complete hypocrisy in defense of any of those--THEN IT IS TO BE BELIEVED WITHOUT QUESTION!

--If it is liberal, anti-Trump, points out acts of police misconduct, points out that guns are dangerous, has three degrees of separation or less from any known Democrat, etc., then it must be fake news or a commie plot.

Get it right or the RWW thought police will pay you a visit any night now. How dare you think you are allowed to disagree!

[reddog1951]

I find it quite interesting that no one cares to rebut my central point that the Capital invasion was unique and intolerable by the very fact that they DID purposely disrupt constitutionally mandated legislative action and REASONABLY posed a threat to the personal safety of lawfully elected public officials.

Riddle me this: What would be your stance had Antifa similarly invaded the Senate during the voting of Supreme Court nominees?