Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
You can do that yourself. I completed my assignment. I found your dissertation on an ectopic pregnancy, the one you forgot that you posted.   |
You have a short memory. Here is your little dissertation on ectopic pregnancy Marcus Welby, which was totally unnecessary. You posted it Oct 2020 about four months ago.
LOL
https://www.eccie.net/newreply.php?d...y&p=106221894 3
You are the one with the fake news posts, not me.
Reply - 'a' - the post you refer to - attributed to me - "the little dissertation on ectopic pregnancy,Marcus Welby........."
Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11
Here We go Again - 'a' thinks it is a physician - and a little knowledge can be dangerous - particularly for 'a'!
Poster could not learn the lesson that a 'temperature' is "NOT DIAGNOSTIC" of wuhan virus!
Proximity to an infected individual does NOT mean Trump caught the wuhan virus from that individual. Wuhan virus is easily transmissible - like Influenza A - and it is currently impossible to verify the source of infection in any One CASE. The statement that Trump caught the Wuhan virus from Hope hicks is a possible, but unproven and unprovable hypothesis ONLY!
BTW - it is 'pregnancy" - and that is not the only cause for elevated HCG hormone in a woman. Typical of deluded DPST's to put forth 'Jerry Springer" as a medical authority.
Springer has had an interesting career - and was mayor of Cincinnati and earned a law degree. No medical degree!!!
Differential diagnosis (aka "medical practice 101")
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/criog/2013/580709/ Case Reports in OB-GYN
Although gynaecological malignancies are a common reason for elevated serum hCG in nonpregnant women, it has also been described as paraneoplastic syndrome in other nongynaecological malignancies including cancers of the bladder, kidney, prostate, GI-tract, breast, and lung [10].
Another potential origin of hCG production which is sometimes overlooked due to the common focus on ectopic pregnancy or an underlying malignancy is the pituitary gland in peri- or postmenopausal women [15]. The exact mechanism of hCG production in the gonadotropic cells of peri- or postmenopausal women or after bilateral oophorectomy is unknown. The most likely explanation is the reduction of ovarian steroid hormone synthesis that releases the negative feedback control of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Under this overstimulation, the pituitary may secrete hCG [5].
I realize the 'a' reaction is likely to be 'splody head" and continual, unrelenting insistence on the 'Rightness" of the cause . Not sorry about using the forbidden word 'right' to the lefties.
It really is amazing how the Leftiest racist, DPST's push their totally unsupported BS as factual information to others - when it is obvious from a cursory verification search how wrong they are - always!
'a' is not competent nor trained to comprehend the reference from medical literature on differential diagnosis above. Maybe 'a will choose to attend Mexican medical school in an effort to bolster its' credibility!
Physician 'friends' - 'a' - good luck with that in your case.
LOL |
My goodness 'a' - I tried to just ignore this foolishness - but- to point out -
the comments were in relation to 'a' and the insistence that 'temperature' is diagnostic of wuhan virus infection ' and my reply - Poster could not learn the lesson that a 'temperature' is "NOT DIAGNOSTIC" of wuhan virus infection in and of itself alone - and without any other signs, symptoms, or testing. !
Of note - the so-called dissertation on ectopic pregnancy" - was a quotation from a medical journal (not written by me) - and 'ectopic pregnancy' - was mentioned ONCE.
The discussion was in relation to differential diagnosis of elevated HCG ( human chorionic gonadotropin - a hormone) in women.
'a - you would never be published in a peer reviewed medical journal with that type of incorrect attribution and quotation.
and yes - I am published in the NEJM.
Not that I care about your opinion any more than you care about my opinion on the matter.
Bottom Line - 'a is not a licensed physician in any US state - and any opinions published on medical maters by 'a' are not to be taken seriously.
How do i know - the responses 'a posts to issues any licensed physician would know the proper answer - immediately.
This post is not to be construed in any way as 'Outing" of any individual under any circumstances.
IMHO.
So - 'a' - perseverance in teh pursuit of nonsense - reminds One very much of Don Quixote, and is equally as fruitless, and not cogent or constructive.
So -'a' - please go back to the OP and premise of the thread - which is the DPST 'cancel culture' of anyone the DPST/ccpers dislike for any reason.
Give it up - layman.
I agree - time this thread is CLOSED.
I will rtm and ask the Moderator to do so.
