Encounter: Rushed Job with Tiff

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by chizzy

she loves her candy
she loves her juice
she loves sugar
be careful of the poison ivy rash

suggestions.............. and if i get points for this, something is wrong here

I don't think anyone here has ever been pointed for mentioning "signs of extracurricular activities".

[DrivesAllDay]

I remember seeing her on a Sugar Daddy site about 2 or 3 years ago. Got to talking to her but her attitude made me move on.

[zip2121]

Originally Posted by lustylad

I don't think anyone here has ever been pointed for mentioning "signs of extracurricular activities".

I did for making an equally vauge reference. That's all my infractions actually.

Crazy when you can get banned from a hooker board for what is acceptable on facebook.

[blckstuff412]

[paintedbynumbers]

Originally Posted by blckstuff412

[Jacuzzme]

I’ve gotta agree with the above, a girls bad habits should definitely be allowed in reviews. Seems to me this is a vital piece of information.

[Dr-epg]

Gentlemen

There are several rules associated to this type of conversation

#14 - There is no place in our forums for the general discussion or speculation of illicit drug use. This is to be considered a forbidden topic and mention of it will be removed.

The rule above sums it up. Until these are changed by the site owners this is what we all have to follow.

Thanks

[bkfantasy]

Do you have any suggestions for ways to avoid violating the rule while still helping fellow board members avoid certain hazards of the hobby? I understand the need for the site owners and mods to keep the board 'clean'. However, between the restriction on hofo links and now the tightening down on the information we can provide in reviews, the site is roughly 90% less useful than it was before. Again, I understand that perhaps that is just the world we are living in now. But maybe there are suggestions for avoiding violations while still providing some useful information.

[Darkshades2007]

Originally Posted by bkfantasy

Do you have any suggestions for ways to avoid violating the rule while still helping fellow board members avoid certain hazards of the hobby? I understand the need for the site owners and mods to keep the board 'clean'. However, between the restriction on hofo links and now the tightening down on the information we can provide in reviews, the site is roughly 90% less useful than it was before. Again, I understand that perhaps that is just the world we are living in now. But maybe there are suggestions for avoiding violations while still providing some useful information.

Wouldn't it just be safe to say she has "habits I don't like " and give a no recommendation? That says nothing about any illegal or illicit activities, the habit could be that she bites her nails.

I agree that Thurman has provided very useful posts in the past, maybe it's a temporary ban???

[berryberry]

Dr-Epg - I think the confusion is certain vague comments (that could be taken multiple ways) have always been allowed. So guys would just like to know what type of vague reference is allowable

[Dr-epg]

Guys
Medical and or drug speculation is the problem My suggestion would be give a no for the recommendation and add “PM for details” This would resolve the problem.

Thanks

[cabot]

Damn - Thurmann was banned? That's crazy - easily the most valuable poster to come along in years. That's such a loss to the board - I can't believe that's a good decision... I assume the reason from above.

As for 'no', and 'PM for details' - that means everytime you review a girl to warn people, you have to reply to 50 PMs. plus, half the guys don't get the word out.

I do not believe that would resolve the problem in a meaningful manner.

[t-bird57]

Originally Posted by wheretogo

God knows its more important to protect the reputations of these ""fine women"" than it is to protect the people who support this site...

I corrected your post for you notice the double quotes to get the point across

[DaveHo]

Originally Posted by Dr-epg

There are several rules associated to this type of conversation

#14 - There is no place in our forums for the general discussion or speculation of illicit drug use. This is to be considered a forbidden topic and mention of it will be removed.

The rule above sums it up. Until these are changed by the site owners this is what we all have to follow.

Sorry, but hosting a forum doesn't get you unquestioning obedience. Mention of it was removed, for all the "good" that does, and banning the poster after the fact accomplishes nothing but making every guy out there less safe.

[Dr-epg]

Gentlemen
There have been a ton of assumptions in this thread which there is no need to discuss

The rules are what they are whether we agree with them on not. The owners want no drug references or speculations no matter how vague. Follow the guidelines or not that is your individual choice

As far a unquestioningly obedience Really that does not even make any sense we get questioned on everything

The Dr