"Amy"

[Chuck353]

https:/albany.skipthegames.com/femal...0/202011464387

Anyone see this girl? Was going by Nikki before.

[Warrenajeffers]

Link doesn’t work

[Chuck353]

https:albany.skipthegames.com/female...0/323597679612

[Funtimes44]

christ I get infraction for posting a link... nobody else lol... what is North Korea moderating this site

[Dr-epg]

Links are not allowed they are considered advertising

The Dr

[Chuck353]

Don't sweat it. I got one. Guess links are only allowed in the Encounters section. Effin rookies.

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by Chuck353

https:albany.skipthegames.com/female...0/323597679612

good thing she got all covered

just a nip will get ya banned

[57fubar]

Originally Posted by Funtimes44

christ I get infraction for posting a link... nobody else lol... what is North Korea moderating this site

yeah, I got hit with the same shit a while back..........fucking idiots running this show now

[Tomb8871]

Nah I just think current mod more aware of the link restriction. They have to be careful to not get tagged ad an advertising site which I guess is what posting of links does. Idea is to avoid getting shut down like no and cl, or having to move offshore. Can get around that with a little ingenuity, such as just reference to title of stg post. A bit of a PITA, but not a big deal imo

[Funtimes44]

that makes a lot of sense you can't post a link with a question...but a link you reviewed with a positive experience... don't you think posting a link with positive experience would be more of a advertisement lol... loop hole there lol... doesn't make sense... just eliminate all links then

[Tomb8871]

I would assume somehow their lawyers see a distinction that they feel is defensible. I actually think they would be more vulnerable from having that adultsearch site coming up all the time, but what do I know. Hopefully the morality police have had their day and will stop playing whack a mole

[DeconKeys]

So back to the question. Amy/Nikki?

[Olliebear]

It appears she's using her child's name as part of her Snapchat address, so right off the bat I question her common sense. That has nothing to do with her service (about which I know zip), but that would give me pause.

[Guest072323]

Originally Posted by 57fubar

yeah, I got hit with the same shit a while back..........fucking idiots running this show now

fuckin Fubar....

Originally Posted by Tomb8871

I would assume somehow their lawyers see a distinction that they feel is defensible. I actually think they would be more vulnerable from having that adultsearch site coming up all the time, but what do I know. Hopefully the morality police have had their day and will stop playing whack a mole

Usually it's just simple WOS