Women for Trump

[bambino]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

It's obvious that you don't understand that many of those 80 million votes were votes against Trump (the biggest buffoon in the history of the presidency), more so than votes for Biden, and a lot of Republicans were included in that 80 million. You also don't understand that while those Republicans wanted the buffoon out, they probably didn't want the Democrats to control the Senate. It's really not that difficult to understand for us reasonable people, but you'd rather believe the baseless accusations of a deranged con man, that have consistently been laughed out of court.

So, your saying tens of millions voted against Trump but not FOR Biden. That’s more plausible than 80 voted for Biden.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by bambino

How many more billions does he have than you?

Completely irrelevant question. J Michael never claimed to be a great business man, nor was he born into an empire, as far as I can tell, and furthermore, he didn't run for president on a campaign of fear, hate, and division. Smarten up.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by bambino

So, your saying tens of millions voted against Trump but not FOR Biden. That’s more plausible than 80 voted for Biden.

I thought you were done with me? LOL

Yep. It's obviously impossible to calculate the exact number, but a substantial number of the votes for Biden were just to get Trump out of office, rather than any great endorsement of Biden. I myself and a few others in this thread are counted amongst them.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Bambino claims to defend the constitution but he demonstrates that he doesn't give a fuck about the first amendment.

Oh, I support the 1st Amendment. I don’t support lawlessness and destruction, and murder. If you deny that happened in cities across the country you’re blind. If you support that activity you’re as criminal as thugs that burnt Minneapolis to the ground. Learn what the 1st amendment stands for before you accuse others not supporting it.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

I thought you were done with me? LOL

Yep. It's obviously impossible to calculate the exact number, but a substantial number of the votes for Biden were just to get Trump out of office, rather than any great endorsement of Biden. I myself and a few others in this thread are counted amongst them.

I was done with you yesterday. But it appears you rolled out of the wrong side of the bed this mid morning. Or are you just terminally angry.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by bambino

Oh, I support the 1st Amendment. I don’t support lawlessness and destruction, and murder. If you deny that happened in cities across the country you’re blind. If you support that activity you’re as criminal as thugs that burnt Minneapolis to the ground. Learn what the 1st amendment stands for before you accuse others not supporting it.

You don't understand the first amendment, and you grossly overestimate the "lawlessness, destruction, and murder."

"Donald J Trump is calling for a total and complete shut down of Muslims entering the country" is against the first amendment. Gassing peaceful protestors as he did in DC is against the first amendment. The President (government) consistently claiming that the media is lying when in fact they're telling the truth about him, is against the first amendment.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by bambino

I was done with you yesterday. But it appears you rolled out of the wrong side of the bed this mid morning. Or are you just terminally angry.

Nice try to spin your lack of self control. Just another way that you're like your orange hero. I'm not angry. I'm laughing at your ridiculousness. Smarten up.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

You don't understand the first amendment, and you grossly overestimate the "lawlessness, destruction, and murder."

"Donald J Trump is calling for a total and complete shut down of Muslims entering the country" is against the first amendment. Gassing peaceful protestors as he did in DC is against the first amendment. The President (government) consistently claiming that the media is lying when in fact they're telling the truth about him, is against the first amendment.

What opinion piece is this from?

[bambino]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Nice try to spin your lack of self control. Just another way that you're like your orange hero. I'm not angry. I'm laughing at your ridiculousness. Smarten up.

You make zero sense. Come back when you do. So I’m done with you for today.

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

I'm not willfully ignorant like a lot of the Trumpsters, so I know the context quite well.

He called the mexicans coming here rapists and murderers during a minute long rant against them and then at the end included a one liner "and some I assume are good people" after he'd just spent several paragraphs trashing them.

About the incident in Virginia, he said that there were "very fine people on both sides," but one side were marchers protesting the removal of monuments to white supremacists.

You resort to grammar nazing because you have no valid point otherwise.

Gee, you’re dumb. There were “fine people” on both sides of the taking down statues issue. The statement had absolutely nothing to do with skinheads, and President Trump repeatedly said so when he made it. “Their” vs “they’re” has nothing to do with your post, it is referring to the rapist comments. Go listen closely to it again.

Frankly, you don’t seem to have the intellect and/or open mindedness to sustain a nuanced discussion. The CNN Orangeman bad programming is far to strong.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Gee, you’re dumb. There were “fine people” on both sides of the taking down statues issue. The statement had absolutely nothing to do with skinheads, and President Trump repeatedly said so when he made it. “Their” vs “they’re” has nothing to do with your post, it is referring to the rapist comments. Go listen closely to it again.

Frankly, you don’t seem to have the intellect and/or open mindedness to sustain a nuanced discussion. The CNN Orangeman bad programming is far to strong.

Pretty much sums him up. Irrational hatred, intellectually deficient, childish behavior. All wrapped up in one package.

[jmichael]

Originally Posted by bambino

BTW, more news on the Michigan Dominion machine audit. It’s on. If one wants to do a “cursory” search on google to prove me wrong, have at it. The Plaintiff makes a statement at the end of the piece should describe how every honest, objective citizen should feel. Just get it right.


https://api.parler.com/l/rhs5l

https://www.freep.com/story/news/pol...er/3839075001/

Btw you are correct about me admitting I let someone else use my account, and I was told it was in violation of the rules and a decision would be made about my punishment
I know you are hoping I get banned and if I do it still doesn't mean you are not afraid to take me up on my challenge I'm not banned yet, show you really believe this shit you post is true. but I doubt you have the back bone

[bambino]

Originally Posted by jmichael

https://www.freep.com/story/news/pol...er/3839075001/

Btw you are correct about me admitting I let someone else use my account, and I was told it was in violation of the rules and a decision would be made about my punishment
I know you are hoping I get banned and if I do it still doesn't mean you are not afraid to take me up on my challenge I'm not banned yet, show you really believe this shit you post is true. but I doubt you have the back bone

First off, I don’t care if you get banned or not. YOU posted what you did not me. You said it was a kid. That could have been a minor.. which is a big no no. At least you said the “kid” was 25. Small redemption. So you did it to yourself. As far as your bet I gave you yesterday to prove me wrong. You didn’t. So you lost. Time will tell what the mods will decide. Here’s what I think. You’re an immature, troubled person. Looking for attention. Similar to Pittsburgh1. A little less anger. You need to figure things out for yourself.

[rmg_35]

Originally Posted by bambino

Pretty much sums him up. Irrational hatred, intellectually deficient, childish behavior. All wrapped up in one package.

I agree 100%. Could not have described yourself any better.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by rmg_35

I agree 100%. Could not have described yourself any better.

Look in the mirror Bluto.