Assumptions aside - actual suits and claims

[1blackman1]

So we can all be clear as to what Trump and his legal team actually sued on IN COURT rather than what they say on Fox, Newsmax, Twitter or parlor. Here are the actual suits and claims. Look for the fraud allegations below.

Pennsylvania


1. To compel Philadelphia election officials to stop counting ballots.

A federal judge dismissed the request.

2. To compel state election officials to allow Trump campaign officials closer observation of the counting process.

Campaign officials allowed to move closer in observing the Philadelphia process from a six foot distance.

3. To compel Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar and all 67 counties to impose an earlier date for voters to show proof of identification if it was not on their initial ballots.

The presiding judge ordered all counties to segregate ballots if the voters do not provide supplemental identification by Nov. 9. These ballots are not currently included in the vote count. Other segregated ballots have not been included in the vote count.

4. To compel the Montgomery County Board of Elections to stop counting mail-in-ballots

The campaign and Republican National Committee filed suit to halt the process of counting mail-in ballots in Montgomery County alleging that the board of elections was counting 600 ballots that had not been placed in secrecy envelopes and was therefore not complying with requirements.

5. To intervene in an already existing dispute before the U.S. Supreme Court about whether ballots the state received after 8 p.m. on Election Day should count.

State officials had already ordered counties to segregate any ballots that arrived after Election Day, likely anticipating a future challenge.

Nevada

1. To impose an injunction on the automated signature-verification machines used in Clark County as ballots continue to be counted.

A federal judge rejected the request for lack of evidence of any wrongdoing or procedural fault.

The suit alleged that “lax procedures for authenticating mail ballots” had resulted in “over 3,000 instances of ineligible individuals casting ballots.”


2. To compel state election officials to allow the public closer observation at a Clark County ballot-counting facility.

A district judge rejected the lawsuit, ruling they lacked standing to bring the claims and had no evidence to back up their arguments. The plaintiffs appealed to the state Supreme Court, which accepted the request to expedite the case, but denied the request for immediate relief. In a November 5 order, the State Supreme Court said the campaign and state Republicans had reached a settlement. According to local news, the settlement included expanding observation access, so that all counting tables would be visible to the public.

Michigan

1. To halt the counting of absentee ballots, on the grounds that campaign officials had not been given access to observe the process as required by state law.

Michigan Court of Claims denied the campaign’s request on Nov. 6.

2. To halt the certification of election results in Detroit, Michigan’s largest city and a Democratic stronghold.

Judge denied the motion for injunctive relief on Nov. 6, saying there was no evidence that oversight procedures had not been followed. The suit also sought to stop election workers in Detroit from “curing” absentee ballots that could not initially be read by a machine, a normal part of the ballot counting process. The case alleged that the work had not always been overseen by election inspectors from both major political parties, and that certification should be delayed until inspectors could review the process.

Georgia

1. To disqualify about 53 ballots.

A poll watcher in Chatham County reported seeing a stack of late ballots that may have arrived after the 7 p.m. Election Day deadline get mixed in with ballots that had arrived on time.

A Superior Court judge in Chatham County rejected the suit on Nov. 5 after hearing testimony from county officials that the ballots had, in fact, arrived on time. “There is no evidence that the ballots referenced in the petition were received after 7:00 p.m. on Election Day,” the court found.

Arizona:

1. alleging voters’ ballots had been rejected because they contained “bleeds,” splotches” and “stray marks.”

These allegations appear similar to claims circulating on social media that ballots would not be counted if voters filled them out using a Sharpie marker. Election officials have said these claims are false. A lawsuit with similar allegations was filed in the same court system by a group of voters who were represented by a conservative legal fund on Nov. 4; plaintiffs dropped the lawsuit on Nov. 7. They did not provide a reason for dismissing the case

[Yssup Rider]

Nothing. They’re on the greatest fishing expedition since Jaws.

Trumps team is only interested in pleasing the boss. They know there’s nothing out there, but they also know how much damage this colossal asshole will do between now and Jan 20’s arrest date.

[rexdutchman]

First stop watchin cnnn and the kool aide , second whoever is chosen it will be on December 14 not what the baffoons in the LSM think
and just a tid bit Supreme court ordered pa to stop and separate the votes 2 x before they complied so get your news correct

[1blackman1]

Actual suits filed dummy. It’s not a matter of news. This is the actual allegations by the lawyers to the judges.

[rexdutchman]

Oh and ACTUALLY the supreme court IS tell pa these thinks look it up
N Gorsuch ordered PA to separate the vote for the up coming legal changes

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by rexdutchman

First stop watchin cnnn and the kool aide , second whoever is chosen it will be on December 14 not what the baffoons in the LSM think
and just a tid bit Supreme court ordered pa to stop and separate the votes 2 x before they complied so get your news correct

An existing issue with the Supreme Court was mentioned in Post #1 for Penn. It was bullet #5.


5. To intervene in an already existing dispute before the U.S. Supreme Court about whether ballots the state received after 8 p.m. on Election Day should count.

[rexdutchman]

Because the Gov can't change the voting laws in violation of art 2 ( like whats happened in all the questioned states )

[1blackman1]

Proud stupidity is strong amongst the Idiot Crew

[1blackman1]

Originally Posted by rexdutchman

Because the Gov can't change the voting laws in violation of art 2 ( like whats happened in all the questioned states )

Quote the relevant portion of Art. II you’re referring to.

[tannana]

Originally Posted by rexdutchman

First stop watchin cnnn and the kool aide , second whoever is chosen it will be on December 14 not what the baffoons in the LSM think
and just a tid bit Supreme court ordered pa to stop and separate the votes 2 x before they complied so get your news correct

10k of those ballots. Biden ahead by 50k in PA. Watching you guys shotgun your own foot would be amusing if it wasn't so brownshirt.


I urge the use of elementary math or googling "moot."

[Yssup Rider]

He’ll drag you down to his level and beat you with experience...

[WTF]

Originally Posted by rexdutchman

First stop watchin cnnn and the kool aide , second whoever is chosen it will be on December 14 not what the baffoons in the LSM think
and just a tid bit Supreme court ordered pa to stop and separate the votes 2 x before they complied so get your news correct

True , it is not official Dec 14.

But which betting ticket would you rather have right now. The one who bet a million bucks Trump would be the winner or the one who bet on Biden.

Next there are under 10 thousand ballots that fall under that purview.

Do you know how much Biden is already ahead in Penn?


As Dandy Don would sing BEFORE the game was OFFICIALLY over...


Turn out the lights , the party's over...



/

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by WTF

Do you know how much Biden is already ahead in Penn?


As Dandy Don would sing BEFORE the game was OFFICIALLY over...


Turn out the lights , the party's over...



/

+1

The republicans will try to drag it out a bit. However, the ballgame is over. Trump and Pence are going home.

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

+1

The republicans will try to drag it out a bit. However, the ballgame is over. Trump and Pence are going home.

Fucking parrots

[pfunkdenver]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Fucking parrots