Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
398 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70819 | biomed1 | 63644 | Yssup Rider | 61245 | gman44 | 53346 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48799 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37398 | CryptKicker | 37228 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
10-02-2020, 11:21 AM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,198
|
Trump Should Announce that HE will Pack SCOTUS
Trump and Court Packing
President should give the Democrats a hip-shimmy-and-head-fake on packing the Supreme Court. If he were to make a direct statement or at least "leak" the thought that he himself intends to add Justices to SCOTUS it whether he wins the election or not, could flush out the Democrats on that subject. By co-opting the idea he would get Democrats to loudly denounce the concept and provide all the arguments against it. Then he can say, "Well I guess you are right. It really is a bad idea." Doing this could kill the idea of court packing for another fifty years.
I am sure that there is a more subtle and politically savy way to work through this.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 11:40 AM
|
#2
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
lol!!!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 12:39 PM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
Per their usual unthinking hysteria - the racist, marxist DPST's would be sure to rush to condemn Trump for packing the SC. They universally line up against anything Trump proposes - regardless.
If biden is elected and they get he senate - they will go ahead and pack the SC anyway - they have no thought to having their hypocrisy, corruption, and Lies exposed.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 01:11 PM
|
#4
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,123
|
He can’t because he needs both houses to restructure the court. Also, he might be dead soon so he won’t be packing anything but a casket.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 02:30 PM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
1b1 - as the rest of the racist, marxit DPST's - u show your own depravity regarding the wuhan virus infection of the POTUS
sniggering with glee much???
1b1 - your teacher's unions racist marxist education - left U sorely ignorant of the Constitution. Try reading it, if u know where to find a copy.
Not that it may mater much shortly - if harris takes office - the Constitution is dead and she will try to enforce marxism on Amerika - and be deposed by Civil WAR.
Typical - teacher's Union total ignorance education.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 02:58 PM
|
#6
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,198
|
It would be a rope-a-dope. This is not a real thing, it is a three-moves-deep strategy.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 03:04 PM
|
#7
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
Nobody would buy that Bullshit. Besides, he is packing the Court already
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 03:24 PM
|
#8
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 28, 2012
Location: In your head, RENT FREE!
Posts: 2,084
|
The only thing Trump's gonna be packing for the next few weeks is his Huggies.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 03:31 PM
|
#9
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
.... Also, he might be dead soon so he won’t be packing anything but a casket.
|
You want to put a wager on that?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 05:55 PM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
Nobody would buy that Bullshit. Besides, he is packing the Court already
|
Depends on your definition CT - nominating a qualified justice to a vacancy on the 9 person court is not considered 'packing' What FDR tried to do , and the DPST have trumpeted that they will do - is nominate and confirm more justices than 'teh' current convention of 9 for seats on 'teh' SC.
Not to mention - if the DPST party had this opportunity to put a radical legislative judge on 'teh' SC under these same circumstances - you want to bet money they 'wouldn't do it"????
Of course they would , and will given the opportunity of a combined DPST Senate and POTUS.
usual DPST hypocrisy!!!!
Which will be the end of' 'teh' Rule of law under our Constitution, as it would have been if FDR had succeeded.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 06:02 PM
|
#11
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,123
|
Don’t worry. Demo will get both houses and the presidency and restructure the court I a favorable way. Maybe send Thomas and Alito to the circuit and move Garland and Stewart to the SC. Do a 10 year rotation. Or just say fuck it and make the SC 13 members. And start rotating the district and circuits.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 06:08 PM
|
#12
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,245
|
Cogent and constructive or racist and Marxist?
Congratulations, DOTY 2020
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
10-02-2020, 06:39 PM
|
#13
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
Be careful what One asks for Sheeples - it may not be what 'the' DPST acolytes are expecting!!
LOL
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-03-2020, 09:44 AM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,198
|
I am looking for a scenario where Trump sasys he will nominate an additional two candidates for two additional seats on SCOTUS. I anticipate that the Democrats will howl about how it is unconstitutional, unethical and immoral etc. I am looking for the left to develop every argument opposing the expansion of the court.
I expect that the subject of a constitutional amendment will come up and perhaps an amendment proposed.
Then, win or lose in November, the liberals will have painted themselves into a corner on the subject. If Trump wins, he can drop the idea of adding justices and force the issue of an amendment forbidding it.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-03-2020, 09:51 AM
|
#15
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
interesting thought - ICU - but hypocrisy is the snowflake DPST stock in trade
They will do whatever they see as their path to controlling the population under One party marxist rule - regardless.
Hypocrisy is 'teh' DPST stock in trade.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|