Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
Starscream66 287
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 279
sharkman29 260
Top Posters
DallasRain71007
biomed164850
Yssup Rider61777
gman4453813
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49111
WTF48267
pyramider46388
bambino43244
The_Waco_Kid38109
CryptKicker37316
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2020, 02:58 PM   #1
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default Another indicator that Odumbo's nuclear treaty was a POS

.


Quote:
Research Group Discloses Undeclared Iran 'Nuclear Weapons' Development Site

"... the site highlights concretely that Iran was putting in place a nuclear weapons production industry, not just a development program, and there is no evidence of its destruction."

the discovery of this new site "shows the extent to which Tehran lied to international inspectors about its past and possibly ongoing nuclear weapons program.”


(Radio Farda)

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 03:02 PM   #2
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

its nice that you are back

maybe its that you have been around and I failed to notice
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 03:33 PM   #3
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
its nice that you are back

maybe its that you have been around and I failed to notice
No. I haven't been here for a few weeks. I was on a hiatus. Grassley did a lot by unredacting those footnotes in the Horowitz report, but I'm waiting for the Durham shoe to drop. COVID-19 news is drowning these other reports.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 03:35 PM   #4
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

It will be interesting to see your thoughts on the Durham report!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 03:40 PM   #5
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11 View Post
It will be interesting to see your thoughts on the Durham report!
Barr is talking like it might be October or even November. I was hoping for May. I'm following John Solomon, Sara Carter, Mollie Hemingway and Brett Baier.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 04:01 PM   #6
eccielover
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,267
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Barr is talking like it might be October or even November. I was hoping for May. I'm following John Solomon, Sara Carter, Mollie Hemingway and Brett Baier.
A nice October surprise.
eccielover is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 04:10 PM   #7
HedonistForever
Valued Poster
 
HedonistForever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 31, 2019
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 5,667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Barr is talking like it might be October or even November. I was hoping for May. I'm following John Solomon, Sara Carter, Mollie Hemingway and Brett Baier.

As am I! I'm not suggesting all FOX News shows are equal in their reporting but those names as well as others are doing the best reporting in media. They have been correct in everything they have reported from day one of the Russia Hoax! No, for you on the left, that isn't to suggest that Russia didn't try ( with little effect in my opinion since no evidence of votes changed can be verified ) to interfere in our election, of course they did and they will again. No, the hoax was that the Trump campaign played any part in the effort to interfere.


I was hopping for a summer time frame but as long as it is before the Nov. election, I'll be satisfied. The delay seems to be because they were uncovering more and more information the longer they investigated and they turned it from an inquiry to a criminal investigation.


Wouldn't you just love to see a perp walk with Comey and Brennan in cuffs.


And "who the hell is Joseph Mifsud"? Inquiring minds want to know!
HedonistForever is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 04:23 PM   #8
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
No. I haven't been here for a few weeks. I was on a hiatus. Grassley did a lot by unredacting those footnotes in the Horowitz report, but I'm waiting for the Durham shoe to drop. COVID-19 news is drowning these other reports.
Speaking of Covid drowning out reports.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...in-2016-198171

It’s the third time the Senate intelligence committee agreed with the intelligence reports....but, but, but, Durham, eh?
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 04:34 PM   #9
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,207
Encounters: 10
Default

Jaxboy forgot to say the House Intelligence Committee disagrees with its Senate counterpart. Here's the inside scoop from an intel pro:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/hous...red-fleitz.amp

Not only did John Brennan cherry-pick the analysts who prepared the original intel report that was released in January 2017 (i.e., on the eve of trump's inauguration), he engaged in improper "analytic tradecraft" to shape and pre-ordain its conclusions to his liking.


"Contrary to common practice for controversial intelligence community assessments, Brennan’s team allowed no dissenting views or even an annex with reviews by outside experts.

These were extraordinary violations of intelligence community rules to ensure that analysis is accurate and trusted. The Senate committee reports ignored these foundational violations."
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 04:55 PM   #10
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,207
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Grassley did a lot by unredacting those footnotes in the Horowitz report, but I'm waiting for the Durham shoe to drop.
So is Bill Barr!

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...for-the-russia

Welcome back.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 05:12 PM   #11
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
Speaking of Covid drowning out reports.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...in-2016-198171

It’s the third time the Senate intelligence committee agreed with the intelligence reports....but, but, but, Durham, eh?
The footnotes of the Horowitz report that Grassley had unredacted says differently. Horowitz was appointed by your boy Odumbo.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post

Thank you.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 05:50 PM   #12
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

senate intel committe and barr appear to be looking at 2 different data sets and have different conclusions on what the data says.


they are contradictory.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 06:00 PM   #13
HoeHummer
BANNED
 
HoeHummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2019
Location: North
Posts: 3,942
Default

Perhaps that’s because the Attorney General is a bigger piece of shits than anyone in the piece of shits US Congress.
HoeHummer is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 06:07 PM   #14
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoeHummer View Post
Perhaps that’s because the Attorney General is a bigger piece of shits than anyone in the piece of shits US Congress.

oh really, a potty mouth like you would know... uh huh....
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 06:52 PM   #15
eccielover
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,267
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
Speaking of Covid drowning out reports.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...in-2016-198171

It’s the third time the Senate intelligence committee agreed with the intelligence reports....but, but, but, Durham, eh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Jaxboy forgot to say the House Intelligence Committee disagrees with its Senate counterpart. Here's the inside scoop from an intel pro:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/hous...red-fleitz.amp

Not only did John Brennan cherry-pick the analysts who prepared the original intel report that was released in January 2017 (i.e., on the eve of trump's inauguration), he engaged in improper "analytic tradecraft" to shape and pre-ordain its conclusions to his liking.


"Contrary to common practice for controversial intelligence community assessments, Brennan’s team allowed no dissenting views or even an annex with reviews by outside experts.

These were extraordinary violations of intelligence community rules to ensure that analysis is accurate and trusted. The Senate committee reports ignored these foundational violations."
So at this point we have different opinions on the scope or purpose of Russian interference with the election.

And yet none of these reports point to or support any collusion by the Trump campaign.

And interestingly enough as pointed out by Jax's story, the Senate has kicked the can down the road on the Steele dossier and it's impact on anything, specifically leaving it out and ignoring it in any analysis they have done to date.

That will be in their "fifth" and what is to be the final report at this point.
eccielover is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved