Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
398 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70819 | biomed1 | 63644 | Yssup Rider | 61234 | gman44 | 53346 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48796 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43220 | The_Waco_Kid | 37398 | CryptKicker | 37228 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
09-30-2019, 08:17 AM
|
#31
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
of course it is curious
that the intelligence community worked to help frame trump about Russia
that they leak information they hope would somehow embarrass trump
that the whistleblower rules were 'secretly" changed
almost makes one believe that a plan was in place, poised, awaiting some event that could be spun
and when they thought they hit on something but it was hearsay, the rules were changed to be able to accomplish the plan
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 08:41 AM
|
#32
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
you guys keep bringing up hearsay, to dodge the fact that Trump's own provided transcript showed the complaints were all TRUE.
your defense is like that of a murder defendant trying to dismiss charges, by saying the indictment spelled his name with a "t" instead of a "d".
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 08:45 AM
|
#33
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
there is no impeachable offense in the transcript
as listed in the constitution
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 08:48 AM
|
#34
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
there is no impeachable offense in the transcript
|
oh, ok.. I'll take your word for it.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 08:53 AM
|
#35
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
oh, ok.. I'll take your word for it.
|
you're more wise than was previously evident
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 09:41 AM
|
#36
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,758
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
The rules were changed effective August 2019. Which means the change was planned before trump's phone call was a blob of cum in the corner of his mouth.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You'd be a liar. Trump's phone call was on 25 July. The rule was changed AFTER the phone call by individuals at the highest level to facilitate the submission of the "complaint", and the "complaint" was written by lawyers that are tied to Soros and hildebeest. The blob of cum is in your eyes and ears.
|
Uh-oh! What does munchy's WaPo fact-checker have to say say about his post?
Oh dear! It rates the dickmuncher's post as a PANTS-ON-FIRE lie!
Hmmm... does July 25 precede or follow the month of August?
Someone's eyes are so blinded by cum he can't even read a calendar!!
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 10:39 AM
|
#37
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Only minutes from downtown
Posts: 7,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
The Truth TRUMPS hearsay every time. still waiting for Schiff to present his Russian collusion "evidence" .. i guess he'll make that up as hearsay too.
BAHHAHHAAAAA
|
There's evidence of collusion with Ukraine now
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 10:57 AM
|
#38
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by matchingmole
There's evidence of collusion with Ukraine now
|
If there's is so much evidence then why did Adam Schiff have to make up his own version of the phone call transcript. Then when it's obvious he lying he passes it off as a parody. We don't need a parody we need the truth. The truth is this whistle blower story is total bullshit. Nothing about it is factual.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 11:01 AM
|
#39
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Only minutes from downtown
Posts: 7,183
|
If Trump thought he might win the 2020 election...then why pressure Ukraine to get dirt on Biden?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 11:34 AM
|
#40
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You'd be a liar. Trump's phone call was on 25 July. The rule was changed AFTER the phone call by individuals at the highest level to facilitate the submission of the "complaint", and the "complaint" was written by lawyers that are tied to Soros and hildebeest. The blob of cum is in your eyes and ears.
|
fuck a bunch of cum on dress's, whistle blowers and rules. Donald dipshit is going to be impeached for trying to get info from a foreign government about a political rival. that's what time it is you fucking traitot
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 12:32 PM
|
#41
|
Account Disabled
|
Oh Oh meltdown is coming. This dumb shit can't even spell.
Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic
fuck a bunch of cum on dress's, whistle blowers and rules. Donald dipshit is going to be impeached for trying to get info from a foreign government about a political rival. that's what time it is you fucking traitot
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 12:41 PM
|
#42
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
you guys keep bringing up hearsay, to dodge the fact that Trump's own provided transcript showed the complaints were all TRUE.
your defense is like that of a murder defendant trying to dismiss charges, by saying the indictment spelled his name with a "t" instead of a "d".
|
No. It's not "all true".
The very premise of the letter is false when the writer claims to be acting "alone" when it's obvious the letter was drafted in lawyer legalese -- and the known lawyers involved are associated with hildebeest and Soros.
Further, the writer falsely subscribes to "know" Trump's "intent" for his every action and impugns his actions are illegal.
But Trump's actions are NOT illegal but rather those prescribed to him by the Constitution as chief executive officer of this great country.
It is the writer and his associates who committed the illegal acts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic
fuck a bunch of cum on dress's, whistle blowers and rules. Donald dipshit is going to be impeached for trying to get info from a foreign government about a political rival. that's what time it is you fucking traitot
|
You're sucking on a big one, Moscow Mystic. This is going to take down several senior dim-retards, starting with Biden, Schiffty and Nadler.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 12:42 PM
|
#43
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
there is no impeachable offense in the transcript
as listed in the constitution
|
The transcript opened the door to impeachment....try and keep up and filter out the nonsense.
Do you or do you not think DJT will be impeached?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 12:45 PM
|
#44
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
No. It's not "all true".
The very premise of the letter is false when the writer claims to be acting "alone" when it's obvious the letter was drafted in lawyer legalese -- and the known lawyers involved are associated with hildebeest and Soros.
Further, the writer falsely subscribes to "know" Trump's "intent" for his every action and impugns his actions are illegal.
But Trump's actions are NOT illegal but rather those prescribed to him by the Constitution as chief executive officer of this great country.
It is the writer and his associates who committed the illegal acts.
.
|
Is that the FDR defense?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-30-2019, 12:53 PM
|
#45
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Is that the FDR defense?
|
An intelligent person could discern that FDR was never mentioned.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|