Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163644
Yssup Rider61234
gman4453344
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48794
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43217
The_Waco_Kid37398
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2019, 09:15 AM   #61
Redhot1960
Valued Poster
 
Redhot1960's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 11, 2019
Location: United States
Posts: 3,631
Default

Yeah, let's have a impeachment trial in the Senate! Sounds like a GREAT IDEAL! MAGA!

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-v...krainians-dnc/

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...struction-2-0/

Quote:
Raptors2020 says:

September 23, 2019 at 8:28 am

Kurt Schlichter pointing out today that impeachment results in a proper trial in the Senate. In other words, President Trump’s defenders get to call witnesses. Witness # 1? Joe Biden, of course. Let’s see how feeble Joe does, explaining away Ukraine, with the whole world watching. Have the Democrats thought this far ahead?
Redhot1960 is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 10:34 AM   #62
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Or it shows POTUS conversations with other world leaders are private....even to you!
they are not completely private, or there would be no need for a Whistleblower statute.

much of the problem people have with Trump stems from his unaccountability to anyone on any matter he chooses. the Presidency has been afforded too much power, that was not Constitutionally granted. of course, the Right sees any information request as the "Deep State" trying to "undo" the 2016 Election. the House needs to grow some balls, and send the Sergeant at Arms to arrest some people. Trump and his Flunkies will continue thumbing their noses until folks are jailed.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 10:41 AM   #63
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
they are not completely private, or there would be no need for a Whistleblower statute.

much of the problem people have with Trump stems from his unaccountability to anyone on any matter he chooses. the Presidency has been afforded too much power, that was not Constitutionally granted. of course, the Right sees any information request as the "Deep State" trying to "undo" the 2016 Election. the House needs to grow some balls, and send the Sergeant at Arms to arrest some people. Trump and his Flunkies will continue thumbing their noses until folks are jailed.
The statute in question applies ONLY to employees of the U.S. intelligence agencies: not the president of the United States.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:03 AM   #64
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,758
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
the House needs to grow some balls, and send the Sergeant at Arms to arrest some people.
Funny I don't recall your saying that a few years ago when the House held Eric Holder and Lois Lerner in contempt?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:10 AM   #65
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The statute in question applies ONLY to employees of the U.S. intelligence agencies: not the president of the United States.
maybe.. different people say different things. real truth is a scare commodity these days.

back to Ukraine.. we don't know what Trump said to the Ukraine President, but he now admits they talked about "Biden" (Hunter, Joe, or both). the Whistleblower's message should be heard by the relevant House Committee, but the problem is partisan House Members might not like what they hear. I agree with what was posted yesterday.. this Whistleblower could actually be a Trump Official "setting up" the Democrats. it could backfire against Biden. then I see stories like this:

https://apnews.com/9d4595ba4f3140c6bb6a3473a91f4a4c

that calmly say "there is no evidence" Hunter was "inappropriately" hired.. really? just what qualifications did he possess for that position? sure, the Ukraine government doesn't see that a crime was committed, because that is normal protocol in 90% of Countries, to further Nepotism as a business strategy.

remember a few weeks ago, when I predicted Biden would quit the race "sometime in October"? I feel like my prediction is lined up perfectly with events taking place.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:11 AM   #66
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
they are not completely private, or there would be no need for a Whistleblower statute.

much of the problem people have with Trump stems from his unaccountability to anyone on any matter he chooses. the Presidency has been afforded too much power, that was not Constitutionally granted. of course, the Right sees any information request as the "Deep State" trying to "undo" the 2016 Election. the House needs to grow some balls, and send the Sergeant at Arms to arrest some people. Trump and his Flunkies will continue thumbing their noses until folks are jailed.
agreed. its pathetic the culture of lying is so acceptable to the trump faithful. Sean Spicer, Sarah Sanders ,Lewandowsky, etc, etc
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:15 AM   #67
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
agreed. its pathetic the culture of lying is so acceptable to the trump faithful. Sean Spicer, Sarah Sanders ,Lewandowsky, etc, etc
it is so commonplace, that they now smirk every time they lie. as if they are in on "the joke" the Trump Administration plays. Lewandowsky should have been handcuffed before leaving the Committee room last week.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:24 AM   #68
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,758
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
Lewandowsky should have been handcuffed before leaving the Committee room last week.
For what? Telling the truth? The guy admitted he feels free to lie to the liars in the fake news media. I found that to be refreshingly honest and candid. You should applaud Lewandowski, not handcuff him.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:26 AM   #69
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
maybe.. different people say different things. real truth is a scare commodity these days.

back to Ukraine.. we don't know what Trump said to the Ukraine President, but he now admits they talked about "Biden" (Hunter, Joe, or both). the Whistleblower's message should be heard by the relevant House Committee, but the problem is partisan House Members might not like what they hear. I agree with what was posted yesterday.. this Whistleblower could actually be a Trump Official "setting up" the Democrats. it could backfire against Biden. then I see stories like this:

https://apnews.com/9d4595ba4f3140c6bb6a3473a91f4a4c

that calmly say "there is no evidence" Hunter was "inappropriately" hired.. really? just what qualifications did he possess for that position? sure, the Ukraine government doesn't see that a crime was committed, because that is normal protocol in 90% of Countries, to further Nepotism as a business strategy.

remember a few weeks ago, when I predicted Biden would quit the race "sometime in October"? I feel like my prediction is lined up perfectly with events taking place.
Did Biden not publicly admit that he strong armed Ukraine into a quid pro quo deal to fire a Ukrainian official who at that time was investigating his son?

Is it not the Constitutional duty of the president to enforce this nation's laws -- including to discover if Biden and his son violated U.S. laws?
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:29 AM   #70
Redhot1960
Valued Poster
 
Redhot1960's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 11, 2019
Location: United States
Posts: 3,631
Default

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ge-1/#comments

Quote:
It’s Deja-Vu All Over Again – The Ukraine Effort is Simply “Obstruction 2.0″…
Posted on September 22, 2019 by sundance




Quote:
first concrete evidence of “warpipes” being used in their traditional role on the battlefield comes from writings about the Battle of North Inch in 1396. This early association with the military has always stayed with the bagpipes; their penetrating notes were used to unsettle the enemy, and communicate with allies.
https://celticlife.com/a-brief-history-of-the-bagpipes/

Quote:
A2 says:
September 22, 2019 at 11:57 pm
‘the first concrete evidence of “warpipes” being used in their traditional role on the battlefield comes from writings about the Battle of North Inch in 1396. This early association with the military has always stayed with the bagpipes; their penetrating notes were used to unsettle the enemy, and communicate with allies’

Redhot1960 is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:32 AM   #71
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redhot1960 View Post
Quote:
first concrete evidence of “warpipes” being used in their traditional role on the battlefield comes from writings about the Battle of North Inch in 1396. This early association with the military has always stayed with the bagpipes; their penetrating notes were used to unsettle the enemy, and communicate with allies.
https://celticlife.com/a-brief-history-of-the-bagpipes/


Scared the hell out of the Chinese during the Korean War -- they were so unnerved by the pipes that they broke and ran when the Scots attacked.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 11:35 AM   #72
Austin Ellen
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 248809
Join Date: Jun 25, 2014
Posts: 5,654
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Trump stated today that he would be open to releasing the transcripts of the phone conversation.

Trump is doing what is called "leading by the chin" - think a boxer in a ring. He's goading the Dems to try to impeach him.

And, this should be no surprise to anyone, the Dems are falling for it - hook,line and sinker.

Just watch.

He's just too good.
Austin Ellen is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 01:20 PM   #73
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
For what? Telling the truth? The guy admitted he feels free to lie to the liars in the fake news media. I found that to be refreshingly honest and candid. You should applaud Lewandowski, not handcuff him.
no.. for stonewalling and refusing to answer questions.. and lying in written statements previous to the Hearing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
[COLOR="Black"][SIZE="4"] Did Biden not publicly admit that he strong armed Ukraine into a quid pro quo deal to fire a Ukrainian official who at that time was investigating his son?
Biden admitted the strong arm, but many do not think the strong arm had anything to do with Hunter Biden, and that Hunter's Firm was never under investigation.. a few who believe the Firm was under investigation say the investigation was over and no charges rendered, it all had wrapped up when Biden Sr. did the strong arm.

that is what is frustrating.. each "side" has its own fact sheet, and can't (or won't) agree on basic starter truths.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin Ellen View Post
Trump stated today that he would be open to releasing the transcripts of the phone conversation.

Trump is doing what is called "leading by the chin" - think a boxer in a ring. He's goading the Dems to try to impeach him.

And, this should be no surprise to anyone, the Dems are falling for it - hook,line and sinker.

Just watch.

He's just too good.
if it plays out like you suggest.. I stress IF.. then yeah, Trump is a fucking Master. I would love to see it, but for now, I don't think Trump is that savvy.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 01:28 PM   #74
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
Biden admitted the strong arm, but many do not think the strong arm had anything to do with Hunter Biden, and that Hunter's Firm was never under investigation.. a few who believe the Firm was under investigation say the investigation was over and no charges rendered, it all had wrapped up when Biden Sr. did the strong arm.

that is what is frustrating.. each "side" has its own fact sheet, and can't (or won't) agree on basic starter truths.
You left out the part where Hunter Biden's only obvious qualification for that $50,000 per month job with that oligarch was that he was the son of and shared the last name of a sitting vice-president -- the oligarch was buying access to corridors of power in Washington D.C. And there's Alexandra Chalupa -- a Ukrainian citizen -- who worked for the DNC to dig up dirt on Manafort.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 01:35 PM   #75
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You left out the part where Hunter Biden's only obvious qualification for that $50,000 per month job with that oligarch was that he was the son of and shared the last name of a sitting vice-president -- the oligarch was buying access to corridors of power in Washington D.C.
I didn't leave that out, I said the exact same thing earlier, this morning. my position is there is no way in Hell Hunter was qualified, even marginally, to be on that Board. I don't care if Biden Sr.'s "Son of a Bitch" remark was related to Hunter or not.. Prima Facie evidence tells me Hunter got his position through nefarious intent.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved