State Department identifies 23 violations, 'multiple security incidents' concerning hildbeest emails

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Waco, it take all night of surfing the internet to find that quote which is accurate. Here is what Comey said in the same link that backs up what I wrote.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

define "small number" in terms of did not send/receive any emails that were classified.

Zero is the only number that exonerates Clinton and her staff.

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

define "small number" in terms of did not send/receive any emails that were classified.

Zero is the only number that exonerates Clinton and her staff.

Not according to Comey. Their has to be criminal intent and he did not find any!

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Not according to Comey. Their has to be criminal intent and he did not find any!

Comey is liar. Or Lynch is. Or both. which one do you pick?


Comey: Then-Atty. Gen. Lynch urged that the Hillary Clinton email probe be called a 'matter,' not 'investigation'


Loretta Lynch accuses Comey of misrepresenting key Clinton probe conversation, was 'quite surprised' by his testimony

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lor...-investigation


Loretta Lynch denies telling James Comey to call Clinton email probe a 'matter'

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...probe-a-matter


whole lotta contradictions here ...

[USAPunter]

When it comes to government security protocols "intent" is not required to take punitive actions against any persons who violated the set protocols. Setting up her own private server from home is not authorized for any individual using government email. She had to sign paperwork beforehand acknowledging she understood and would comply with all protocols dealing with sensitive information or suffer punitive action for any violations.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Waco, it would take all night of surfing the internet to find that quote which is accurate. Here is what Comey said on July 5, 2016 in the same link that backs up what I wrote.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

I.E. Most of the 150,000 emails were NOT MARKED classified. Again no one is going to Jail. No one is losing their job. At best, there may be some administrative reprimand for these new examples of mishandling classified information that have just come out.

TXdot is right, this is just nickel and dime stuff that is really old news.

Friday night's FBI drop is not "old news". The fissures in the facade covering hildebeest's crimes are beginning to spread.