Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70831
biomed163764
Yssup Rider61304
gman4453377
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48840
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37431
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2019, 10:18 PM   #16
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,431
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Yes

excellent. then why do you oppose Trump's efforts to make them fair, even if it results in a trade war?

a trade war is not what Trump wants. he wants fair agreements. all China has to do is follow suit.

if not then Trump should crush China into economic ruin.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 10:51 PM   #17
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,001
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
excellent. then why do you oppose Trump's efforts to make them fair, even if it results in a trade war?

a trade war is not what Trump wants. he wants fair agreements. all China has to do is follow suit.

if not then Trump should crush China into economic ruin.
A typical Chinese factory employee works 12 hours a day, six days a week for $8000 a year doing mindless, repetitive work we don't want to do. His company, which operates in a fiercely competitive environment and is less profitable than American businesses, sells stuff to us really cheap. So they send us things like televisions, clothes and kitchenware. And we send them paper, U.S. dollars. They give us our dollars back by investing in our government debt and overpriced real estate. They're getting fucked. We're making out like bandits.

It would be great to see American companies have better access to Chinese markets and better protection for their intellectual property. If that were Trump's aim, he should have teamed up with the Europeans, Australians, Canadians and various Asian countries to open up China, instead of slapping our allies with tariffs on iron and aluminum (and soon autos) and abandoning the Trans Pacific Partnership. As it is, if we impose high tariffs on Chinese goods (which btw is a bad idea), they just sell what they were selling to us to the Europeans or whoever.

Finally, a lot of economists believe we'd be better off with no tariffs, regardless of what other countries are doing. That makes our companies leaner, meaner and more competitive, and we put our resources towards the things we do best, making us more productive and prosperous. When government imposes tariffs, it's playing favorites. You end up with fat, lazy businesses run by crony capitalists, shielded by tariffs from competition from other countries
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 11:31 PM   #18
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,431
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
A typical Chinese factory employee works 12 hours a day, six days a week for $8000 a year doing mindless, repetitive work we don't want to do. His company, which operates in a fiercely competitive environment and is less profitable than American businesses, sells stuff to us really cheap. So they send us things like televisions, clothes and kitchenware. And we send them paper, U.S. dollars. They give us our dollars back by investing in our government debt and overpriced real estate. They're getting fucked. We're making out like bandits.

It would be great to see American companies have better access to Chinese markets and better protection for their intellectual property. If that were Trump's aim, he should have teamed up with the Europeans, Australians, Canadians and various Asian countries to open up China, instead of slapping our allies with tariffs on iron and aluminum (and soon autos) and abandoning the Trans Pacific Partnership. As it is, if we impose high tariffs on Chinese goods (which btw is a bad idea), they just sell what they were selling to us to the Europeans or whoever.

Finally, a lot of economists believe we'd be better off with no tariffs, regardless of what other countries are doing. That makes our companies leaner, meaner and more competitive, and we put our resources towards the things we do best, making us more productive and prosperous. When government imposes tariffs, it's playing favorites. You end up with fat, lazy businesses run by crony capitalists, shielded by tariffs from competition from other countries

just one example proves your point wrong. Canada, our "ally".

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...d-unfair-trade


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.1bd959c56d66


so much for "allies"
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 12:26 AM   #19
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,128
Default

I agree with COMPLETE free trade...doesn't ever seem to work.
bb1961 is online now   Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 07:22 AM   #20
gfejunkie
2016 County by County Map
 
gfejunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2009
Location: There now. Not here.
Posts: 4,378
Default

More "Brits love Trump" rubbish...

https://www.foxbusiness.com/features...j5FVWGvGyvqo9U
gfejunkie is offline   Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 09:12 AM   #21
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

May be the next time Nazis or whoever try to take over the Brits they should handle it THEMSELFS ,,,,,,,,,
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 11:05 AM   #22
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,001
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
just one example proves your point wrong. Canada, our "ally".

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...d-unfair-trade


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.1bd959c56d66


so much for "allies"
Yep, the only good Canadian is a dead Canadian. Come on Waco, are you trying to prove the OP's point?

One of your articles was written by two retired senators from timber states, who must have received political contributions from the timber industry when they were office and who may be lobbyists for it now. They other was written by Jimmy Carter, who says his family owns 1800 acres of timber land.

In Canada most timber lands are owned by the provincial governments. In the U.S. they're mostly private lands. The argument is the Canadians don't bid out the timber to logging companies on government lands, and therefore they're subsidizing their timber industry. Well, we do the same thing for farmers and ranchers in the western United States. They get long term, low cost leases from the Bureau of Land Management and renew them and keep them in the family for generations. Agricultural interests in the U.S. get huge government subsidies. Many farmers and ranchers, on private and public lands, couldn't stay in business without them.

And we've had import duties, quotas or export taxes on Canadian lumber for most of the last 40 years, supposedly to even out the effect of their "subsidies." Several times the WTO and NAFTA panels determined these "subsidies" are minimal.

While this is neither here nor there, historically we've exported more goods to the Canadians than they've exported to us.

You would have had a better case if you'd picked Canadian dairy btw.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved