Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 283
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163628
Yssup Rider61219
gman4453334
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48792
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43193
The_Waco_Kid37390
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2019, 11:18 AM   #1
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default Fakebook And The Narrative Of Russian 2016 Elections Interference

Facebook got rid of over 2 BILLION fake accounts over the first 3 months of this quarter.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...-account-purge

This tells me that Facebook is still "vulnerable" to "election interference". In fact it's a feature. FB depends on revenue from advertisers. Advertisers require human eyeballs on their ads. FB depends on ads for revenue and doesn't give a flying fuck whether they are political ads and who funds them. Oh sure, they put in safeguards but they are throwing bullshit ads to my account no matter how many times I click the "Not Interested" or "SPAM" option.

Also, here's supposedly the paltry amount russians spent on FB ads. My guess is that this number doesn't hold up to scrutiny as to what "Russians" and "political interfering" means either.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlo...=.713a425f6f7c

With $81 million spent on Facebook by the Trump and Clinton campaigns, mostly to mobilize core supporters to donate and volunteer, a low-six-figure buy is unlikely to have tipped the election. The Russian effort looks even less influential when one considers the tiny amount of Russian Facebook spending directed at key battleground states — $1,979 in Wisconsin, $823 in Michigan and $300 in Pennsylvania. From an electoral perspective, the campaign was remarkably unsophisticated.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 05-28-2019, 11:28 AM   #2
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

the entire russian interference claim in the election was overblown

russian attempts at influencing american opinion has been something that has gone on for a long time

the piddling amount russia spent on line had no effect

the only real thing that occurred in 2016 of any consequence was the exposure of hellary's and the dnc's emails that showed their lies, racism and collusion with "journalists"

of course we all knew those things, but to have specifics in print in black and white was quite embarrasing and changed narratives

but was russia involved in that?

the overblown focus on the russian interference narrative was merely part of the dimocrats lies in trying to get rid or trump
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 05-28-2019, 09:40 PM   #3
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

I think they spent 10,000. that's not serious money.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 05-29-2019, 09:16 AM   #4
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 05-29-2019, 09:22 AM   #5
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
I think they spent 10,000. that's not serious money.
I remember that either twitter, google or FB said at a Congressional hearing that that's all the Russians spent on their platform. Can't find a link about the hearing to pin which company's rep said it.

$10K is the kinda number a company bureaucrat would say when they don't have any proof and don't want to spend time with further investigation.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved