Quote:
Originally Posted by Weirdtimmy
I see you didnt comment on the girls from SA releasing men's information onto twitter. Lmao. That shit happens quite a bit btw. We are not exposing, outting or destroying anyone anonymity by asking for information on a particular provider. We dont want to waste our time pursuing someone who isn't going to put out. I feel like that's the gist of it.
Why you're so adamant about this notion that we should not talk about particular people on a forum, which only has the purpose of talking about providers, really blows my mind. I can't wrap my head around it. He posted a screen name, not a fucking phone number, not an address, not their child's name or whatever other information that I feel you'd be equally annoyed at someone releasing. No. It's a fucking screen name. Get a grip.
|
1. If they are not going to put out, they are NOT a provider. Why are you deciding they should be on a provider site?
2. I have several sugar baby friends who DO NOT want discussed or advertised on provider sites. Why are their rights not respected?
3. I hobby more than most hobbiests. I would NEVER treat a provider, sugar baby, or anyone else in this manner. It's simply not nice. People have a right to privacy, yes even whores do.
4. I didn't see anyone out anyone on Twitter. So I'm not sure why you think that's relevant to me? (feel free to send me the link)
So a girl from SA outted a guy? So a sugar baby OUTTED a client on Twitter, right? Perhaps that guy talked about her on a provider site and it pissed her off? Just a thought.
4a. Sugar babies don't follow hobby rules because they are NOT providers. A friend had his sugar baby show up in his driveway, throwing all the sex toys and lingerie he got her. His wife was home. Sugar babies do NOT follow hobby rules because they are NOT providers.
5. Many sugar babies are young college students. How are you guys making sure they are legal before you chat about them on a provider site? I know I had to PROVE my age to be here on ECCIE. Not so true with SA last I checked?
6. Y'all googled the legal definition of pandering? It varies by state "but usually include solicitation of customers for prostitution services and
recruitment of prostitutes for hire."
Pandering underage = sex trafficking.
I'm done with this thread. Good luck to you all.