Memo released

[grean]

Anyone have a good link for it? Anyone read it?

[Mr MojoRisin]

This what I was able to find.

Jim


https://www.scribd.com/document/3705...een&from_embed

[StandinStraight]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

This what I was able to find.

Jim


https://www.scribd.com/document/3705...een&from_embed

I wouldn’t waste my time reading it if I were you, it’s another nothing burger, but if you are going to read it I would hurry up, by mid week next week you won’t hear about it any more. It will go down in history as a Republican shame that added to the end of the Republican Party.

[lustylad]

UNCLASSIFIED

Declassified by order of the President — February 2, 2018

January 18, 2018

To: HPSCI Majority Members

From: HPSCI Majority Staff

Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses at the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation

Purpose

This memorandum provides Members an update on significant facts relating to the Committee’s ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 presidential election cycle. Our findings, which are detailed below, 1) raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), and 2) represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.

Investigation Update

On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order (not under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a U.S. citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General (DAG), or the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division.

The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. §1805(d)(1)), a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Then-DAG Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.

Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public’s confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court’s ability to hold the government to the highest standard particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens. However, the FISC’s rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the government’s production to the court of all material and relevant facts. This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts. However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.

1) The “dossier” compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.

b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of—and paid by—the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.

2) The Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23, 2016, Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page’s July 2016 trip to Moscow. This article does not corroborate the Steele dossier because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News. The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News. Steele has admitted in British court filings that he met with Yahoo News—and several other outlets—in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS. Perkins Coie was aware of Steele’s initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington D.C. in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.

a) Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations—an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI in an October 30, 2016, Mother Jones article by David Corn. Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other outlets in September—before the Page application was submitted to the FISC in October—but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts.

b) Steele’s numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling—maintaining confidentiality—and demonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI.

3) Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files—but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.

a) During this same time period, Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISC.

4) According to the head of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its “infancy” at the time of the initial Page FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele’s reporting as only minimally corroborated. Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was—according to his June 2017 testimony—“salacious and unverified.” While the FISA application relied on Steele’s past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations. Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.

5) The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok. Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel’s Office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI Attorney Lisa Page (no known relation to Carter Page), where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated. The Strzok/Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an “insurance” policy against President Trump’s election.

UNCLASSIFIED

PROPERTY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

[StandinStraight]

See total garbage, toilet paper if you print it.

[grean]

That sounds bad.

Director Wray stated that document has numerous omissions, however, that cause it to be very misleading.

[grean]

The WH council also points out when authorizing it to be declassified that it's just political chatter...

"To be clear, the memo reflects the judgement of its congressional authors."

[WTF]

Wow....told us exactly what Nunes had already leaked!

Fox News pundits have already leaked that and CNN legal pundits have already answered with w rebuttal.

Shit this is little different than the fake Secret Society charge.

.

[LexusLover]

Hardly any shocking revelations.

It's too bad the FBI misrepresented the facts to the Judge.

I can see why StandingInShit thinks it's normal.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Hardly any shocking revelations.

It's too bad the FBI misrepresented the facts to the Judge.

.

How do you know what was represented to the judge...were you there?

Has someone there, told you?

[I B Hankering]

Nunes told us that Andrew McCabe testified that the FBI couldn't have secured the FISA Warrant without the Steele Dossier, and also per McCabe the origin of the Steele Dossier was withheld from the FISA court during the application process.

GOP memo.

[NoTell]

Nothing is going to happen.......It never does.

If you can’t catch Hilary....you are in on THE FIX!!!

This is NOTHING!!!

You want REAL RESULTS....STORM THE CAPITAL WITH ONE MILLION PEOPLE
DEMAND THIER RESIGNATION.....UNTIL THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP...YOU ARE DOING NOTHING!!!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Nunes told us that Andrew McCabe testified that the FBI couldn't have secured the FISA Warrant without the Steele Dossier, and also per McCabe the origin of the Steele Dossier was withheld from the FISA court during the application process.

GOP memo.

All that has already been reported and explained...

Fucking thing is a nothing burger. I'm not even sure why the Dems cared...just release their counter point and be done with this.

The way they were acting there was some bomb in there, was not eating a Smoking Gun

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Nunes told us that Andrew McCabe testified that the FBI couldn't have secured the FISA Warrant without the Steele Dossier, and also per McCabe the origin of the Steele Dossier was withheld from the FISA court during the application process.

GOP memo.

And since teh whole russia investigation by Mueller is PREDICATED on that dossier and the fisa warrants, then imo it needs to be disbanded.. AND THE JUDGE On the FISA court needs to be disbarred for giving the warrants for something like this, BASED ON Such flawed info..

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by garhkal

And since teh whole russia investigation by Mueller is PREDICATED on that dossier and the fisa warrants, then imo it needs to be disbanded.. AND THE JUDGE On the FISA court needs to be disbarred for giving the warrants for something like this, BASED ON Such flawed info..

"Fruit of the poison tree" -- phony accusations based on spurious allegations and so-called "evidence" garnered from illegal spying.