Section in ladies Forum

[HoustonRiley]

I still think we need a place where we can review the men. Would be very helpful.
It could be In the ladies forum or it can be public with a behind closed doors section just like they have for us.
I know My reviews say yes. But so many are no where near what I actually look like
Nowhere near what actually happened.
And no info about them as to why whats what.
Us being able to review them would be great.

[Warptcuck]

This is an escort information sharing site. We share information about escorts.

What you are looking for is a monger/hobbyist information site.

[ck1942]

Riley, imo you can always post compliments about the gents in the ladies only area. But do you really want to expose your client list?

imo, much better if you share those compliments very privately with only your lady friends and only after you ask permission from the gents you want to compliment.

Two reasons:

1) many gents tend to be very private and may not want to be "outed" so to speak since that may get them inundated with lady requests attempting to get into their jockstraps and, of course, their wallets

2) such posts may cause some clients and potential clients to shy away from you for security or other reasons.

All that said, there is no bar to you posting "bare" reviews of sessions. By bare, I mean that you omit any data that might possibly identify the male partner.

= = = = =

I seem to recall that aspd had a "compliment" section at one time or another. I also recall several sites that allowed "flirt" threads.

[HoustonRiley]

Well just like men don't do reviews on every single girl they see we wouldn't do reviews on every single man we see.
It would be no different from a man letting you some of the providers he's been with.
Also reviews are not necessarily for compliments they're to let people know how the session went what happened.
I mentioned how it could be put in ladies only forum.thanks

Originally Posted by ck1942

Riley, imo you can always post compliments about the gents in the ladies only area. But do you really want to expose your client list?

imo, much better if you share those compliments very privately with only your lady friends and only after you ask permission from the gents you want to compliment.

Two reasons:

1) many gents tend to be very private and may not want to be "outed" so to speak since that may get them inundated with lady requests attempting to get into their jockstraps and, of course, their wallets

2) such posts may cause some clients and potential clients to shy away from you for security or other reasons.

All that said, there is no bar to you posting "bare" reviews of sessions. By bare, I mean that you omit any data that might possibly identify the male partner.

= = = = =

I seem to recall that aspd had a "compliment" section at one time or another. I also recall several sites that allowed "flirt" threads.

[HoustonRiley]

Incorrect. Its not an escort info sharing site. Lmao that sounds funny
This is a hobbyist/provider board.
Where we share information about each other where we converse about worldly topics and everything under the sun where we check each other out and make sure each other are safe and good to see this is not just a Share info on us lol

Originally Posted by Warptcuck

This is an escort information sharing site. We share information about escorts.

What you are looking for is a monger/hobbyist information site.

[Warptcuck]

Escort
Client
Community
Information
Exchange

I took that directly from the top of this page. It's about Escorts. Or that's how I take it.

Browse Showcases

Search Providers

Ect. I see nothing about the Hobbiest/Mongers.

[Smpslt7]

Client= hobbyist/monger. I see it.

[Warptcuck]

It's all about exchanging information about the escorts. No matter how anyone sees it. That's how i see it.

If I write a review, then a provider writes a review, 2 people have confirmed that they met for money. I think that's enough to hang both. It's handing evidence to LE.

As it is right now, it's your word against hers.

If it comes to both sides writing reviews on the same board, I won't be writing any reviews on here again. I am not dumb enough to hang myself.

[Mr.Incognito]

I understand all that but I would be interested to hear what these ladies really think about us/me.

[Warptcuck]

They are welcome to review me during or after a session.
I can take it.
Being quiet during a session isn't fun for me.
Tell me what you want. I'll try most anything.
If I'm making her uncomfortable, I need to know.

[ck1942]

If I write a review, then a provider writes a review, 2 people have confirmed that they met for money. I think that's enough to hang both. It's handing evidence to LE.

Questioning the logic.

Two anonymous personas posting any information doesn't rise to the level of "evidence" required in front of a judge. Yes, the posts could prompt LEO investigation, and indeed, have done so in some instances that I know of.

ijs

[LimitlessJD]

Correct. The current final post in the legality section's sticky speaks of this:

Originally Posted by CiaraAodhan

While Reviews themselves are rarely i.e. never (almost) used in the prosecution, that doesn't mean they are not used to gain an arrest.

Do not confuse the two.

LEO do and will use forums like this, TER, p411 and other review boards to find and target prostitutes in an area. They look fogr reviews that have vivid sexually explicit acts described. They target those girls because they know how they operate based on the reviews. That lets under cover LEO's know what to ask for and what they can get away with. It saves their office time. They will find ads on places like backpage then cross check their number to see if they have reviews, they go after the ones with consistent reviews.

Reviews may not help them prosecute BUT they DO help them target for busts and arrests. In police states, a bust is enough to kill your reputation, have your photo's all over the news and even though the trial might be months and months out and you may never get convicted, police can and will arrest you for anything they can and let the courts sort it out later.

[HoustonRiley]

Write a review and the provider does not contest that she seen you two people have agreed. Same as agreeing to an undisclosed amount all reviews that stand on the board are proof enough if that was the case.
If the form was in ladies only Forum then L.E would have to become a verified provider or get a warrant to take over the site in order to see it

Originally Posted by ck1942

If I write a review, then a provider writes a review, 2 people have confirmed that they met for money. I think that's enough to hang both. It's handing evidence to LE.

Questioning the logic.

Two anonymous personas posting any information doesn't rise to the level of "evidence" required in front of a judge. Yes, the posts could prompt LEO investigation, and indeed, have done so in some instances that I know of.

ijs

[HoustonRiley]

So you ignored the word CLIENT? That's you and your info too sweety. Newbies are funny. They join something and then boom they're experts

Originally Posted by Warptcuck

Escort
Client
Community
Information
Exchange

I took that directly from the top of this page. It's about Escorts. Or that's how I take it.

Browse Showcases

Search Providers

Ect. I see nothing about the Hobbiest/Mongers.

[Warptcuck]

No. The way I read it, it's not 2 separate persons.
It's the escort clients exchanging information.
I may be wrong, but maybe you can be also.
It could be how you read and it could be about education.
The only way for that part to be solved is for the site admin to say what they meant when they started the site.
Until then, I see it as I read it.
I don't claim to be an expert on the internet, ECCIE, women or hookers, but I have been hobbying longer than you have been alive.
The internet just makes it easier to shop for the right kind of girl and takes some of the guess work out.

Originally Posted by HoustonRiley

So you ignored the word CLIENT? That's you and your info too sweety. Newbies are funny. They join something and then boom they're experts