/tattoos yea or na

[SlowHand50]

In general, I like them. Find them hot. But like almost anything, they can be overdone or poorly done. Art is in the eye of the beholder, they say. One of my favorite ladies has one on her shoulder, one on her back, one on a forearm, a small one on a wrist, one on the outside of a thigh, and one on the back of a calf. All are high-quality artwork, with no garish colors. For me, they enhance her beauty and give her an edgy look that definitely heats me up. That being said, I also love being with women with no body art.

[ICU 812]

I find large tattoos or a multitude of small tattoos to be unattractive bordering a turn-off.

I have worked with patients in a large VA hospital in a major-market city. I have seen many tattoos (well OK . . mostly .on men). There is n othing sadder looking than a 60 year old Hula Girl on a saggy bicep with crepy skin.

Sure its trendy for these young women to have a "tramp-Stamp" on the lower back or lately, a whole sleeve of ink. nJust think how cute its gonna look when thry are fifty-five and older.

I would try to talk any young woman out of getting a tattoo of any sort and certainly not anything of any size.

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by Old-T

It all depends on the quantity, quality, and subject matter. Generally I prefer few to none, but the reality is most younger (under 40) ladies have some so I have learned to accept nicely done ones if I am attracted to the lady otherwise.

For me, i would say, around 40% of those i've seen under 40 have had at least one tat, some more.. Barely 2 out of 17 of those lasses 40 and older that i've seen, though had any..

[Bushjumper]

I have never seen a tattoo that made a woman look more attractive.

[skyleigh]

[QUOTE=Bushjumper;1059766493]I have never seen a tattoo that made a woman look more attractive.[/QUOTE

Agreed. I think that they look trashy. BUT, the new tattoos on the younger gals have cooler context than previous tattoos. i.e. names, zodiac signs, and tribal garb.
In general, tats that are on 40+ yr old women look horrible because they most likely got them when they were young, and now it just looks like a blob of blue or black.
Hopefully the young beauties of today will recognize this and steer clear of the ink gun.

[clitlicker7]

Whats not to like? Some of the best providers I've seen have lots of ink.

[eastside70]

I've seen many ladies with different numbers, types, and sizes of tattoos and none have been distracting. I don't have any myself, but I admire the beautiful art work. It's another thing we can discuss during our visit.

I just recently saw a lady with the most tattoos on anyone I've seen to date and after a very short time I didn't even notice them. And she still looked beautiful.

[tinypenis]

No

[Claire She Blows]

Originally Posted by CoverMe

I've always maintained that the perfect tattoo for a hooker would on her inner thigh and in very small letters say, "If you can read this, you owe me $200."

Omfg, how have I not thought of this yet???

[Claire She Blows]

[QUOTE=skyleigh;1059766796]

Originally Posted by Bushjumper

I have never seen a tattoo that made a woman look more attractive.[/QUOTE

Agreed. I think that they look trashy. BUT, the new tattoos on the younger gals have cooler context than previous tattoos. i.e. names, zodiac signs, and tribal garb.
In general, tats that are on 40+ yr old women look horrible because they most likely got them when they were young, and now it just looks like a blob of blue or black.
Hopefully the young beauties of today will recognize this and steer clear of the ink gun.

I'm 42, started getting ink at 25, and most of my ink is in the last few years (because being a hooker makes it way easier to pay for them). So please take your stereotypes and shove it.

[Joey_Gleet]

[QUOTE=Claire She Blows;1059771515]

Originally Posted by skyleigh

I'm 42, started getting ink at 25, and most of my ink is in the last few years (because being a hooker makes it way easier to pay for them). So please take your stereotypes and shove it.

From a business perspective, based on this impromptu poll anyway, ladies with tattoos are risking turning off about half of their potential customers.

Graffitti on the Taj Mahal .

[Bushjumper]

Yep.

[Gotyour6]

[QUOTE=skyleigh;1059766796]

Originally Posted by Bushjumper

I have never seen a tattoo that made a woman look more attractive.[/QUOTE

Agreed. I think that they look trashy. BUT, the new tattoos on the younger gals have cooler context than previous tattoos. i.e. names, zodiac signs, and tribal garb.
In general, tats that are on 40+ yr old women look horrible because they most likely got them when they were young, and now it just looks like a blob of blue or black.
Hopefully the young beauties of today will recognize this and steer clear of the ink gun.

Some women go to the gym so they don't sag every where as they get older..

Just saying

[bamscram]

A cluster of cherries on the inner thigh, message says "I have one for you ".

[Joey_Gleet]

[QUOTE=Gotyour6;1059772291]

Originally Posted by skyleigh

Some women go to the gym so they don't sag every where as they get older..

Just saying

Gym don't stop the ink from fading and blurring.