Trump's tapes

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by EagleEye

Mr. Mueller may consider the President's statement on taping as witness intimidation.

Hahahaha.... that's not me laughing at your preposterous suggestion, it's Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz (a self-described "proud Hillary Clinton voter", I might add):



http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...erfectly-legal

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by centexguy

The longer this probe goes on the worst it gets for the Democrats.

That's why I love investigations. The dimretards have always been the party of unintended consequences. They should keep up the good work.

[EagleEye]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hahahaha.... that's not me laughing at your preposterous suggestion, it's Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz (a self-described "proud Hillary Clinton voter", I might add):



http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...erfectly-legal

Note, I said may. Let's see what happens with Mueller's investigation. Either way, it will be interesting report that will likely have all you ideologues in a tizzy.

[Cap'n Crunch]

Trump’s June 22 Twitter statement “stops short of clarifying” whether the White House has any tapes or documents.

The bi-partisan statement:

House committee threatens to subpoena White House over existence of Trump-Comey tapes

When news of Comey’s account broke, Trump tweeted that Comey “better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!”

A letter Thursday from Republican Rep. Mike Conaway of Texas, who is leading the Russia probe, and Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California says Trump’s June 22 Twitter statement “stops short of clarifying” whether the White House has any tapes or documents.

Conaway and Schiff said in a statement that the letter makes clear that should the White House not respond fully, “the committee will consider using compulsory process to ensure a satisfactory response.”

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/...p-comey-tapes/