Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
400 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70831 | biomed1 | 63764 | Yssup Rider | 61312 | gman44 | 53378 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48842 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37431 | CryptKicker | 37231 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
12-09-2016, 10:18 PM
|
#1
|
Upgraded Female Account
User ID: 368645
Join Date: Oct 5, 2016
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 68
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Reviews On Hobbyists
Was wondering if there is any possibility us providers could have a review form for the Hobbyists for after we've have seen them? I feel it would be beneficial in many ways
** Could potentially be another safe way to verify a hobbyist
** Could give Intel on some rude or disrespectful Hobbyists providers should steer clear of
** Let providers have A Little Ease Knowing Hobbyist Is legit seeing reviews done by Verified Providers
**** In General In Believe This Could Help Providers Have A Little More Peace Of Mind About Weather They Are Legit Or Not It Has Many Aspects which potentially helps providers stay safe and unharmed or in trouble??
~~
Thanks
Se'Arra
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 06:01 AM
|
#2
|
Upgraded Female Account
User ID: 370914
Join Date: Oct 22, 2016
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 81
My ECCIE Reviews
|
By all means that would be a real game changer around here
For some reason I had the impression we already had a section like that. Butt now would be the time to add a mongers review section for us. Of course we can always find a different way to communicate, as a network should anyway. Especially because the site is designed for a safe and happy hobby,on BOTH sides!
What to do???
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 09:51 AM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 5, 2012
Location: Offshore, Fishing boat.
Posts: 777
|
There is a Powder Room section for the ladies.
Just start a thread in there with all the guy's eccie names. I'm sure it'll fill up fast.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 11:03 AM
|
#4
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AspireRain
Was wondering if there is any possibility us providers could have a review form for the Hobbyists for after we've have seen them? I feel it would be beneficial in many ways
** Could potentially be another safe way to verify a hobbyist
** Could give Intel on some rude or disrespectful Hobbyists providers should steer clear of
** Let providers have A Little Ease Knowing Hobbyist Is legit seeing reviews done by Verified Providers
**** In General In Believe This Could Help Providers Have A Little More Peace Of Mind About Weather They Are Legit Or Not It Has Many Aspects which potentially helps providers stay safe and unharmed or in trouble??
~~
Thanks
Se'Arra
|
The concept comes up every few months. While it sounds reasonable and equitable, there are too many guys with fragile egos to ever see it implemented here.
Wait a little while and all the typical arguments will come out, and you may well be attacked for "not understanding the rules".
But it is a good suggestion anyway.
|
|
Quote
| 4 users liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 11:05 AM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 4, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 120
|
I'd be good with it. It's another way to get verified. Another less detailed option I've seen is where an escort can write "white list" referrals. No details, it basically says she vouches for the client. If you have questions, I guess you could always PM the escort who wrote the referral.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 11:27 AM
|
#6
|
Ribbed, For Her Pleasure
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Not Chicago
Posts: 16,442
|
Dumb ideas never die.
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 12:37 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 31, 2015
Location: East Texas
Posts: 2,584
|
I don't have a problem with it but also believe it will never happen as an actual form version like we have to review Playmates on our side.
With that being said, I don't know much about the Powder Room but if it is set up like our side and it has a search function, why not start a thread by the Hobbiest Name. Only put his handle name and nothing else in the title. Then you can say what you want in the body of the thread.
There could be rules like we have on our side like "Do not bump a thread over 30 days old". I see Playmate A. She then starts a thread on me in the Powder Room. I see Playmate B a few days later. She could add to the thread started by Playmate A or she could start her own thread on me. A month later, when I am asking to see Playmate C, she could search my handle and all threads in the Powder Room that contain my name will pop up for her viewing. Based upon what is said about me, she is then able to make a decision or even reach out to some Playmates who have seen me to get further clarification.
Not all guys participate in the review process on our side so I am sure not all Playmates would participate on your side as well. But the more who do participate, the better the results.
Now I do not know anything about the Powder Room. This might already be in place?
This is not an OWNERSHIP type transaction between them and us. Just because I spend X amount of $ for an hour does not mean I own them for an hour. This is suppose to be a mutually beneficial transaction. Just because I spend $100 at a department store or restaurant doesn't mean I get to behave the way I want. There are still guidelines on god customer etiquette that iust follow. If i do not, then those places might not want me back. I have no problem in the ladies communicating about what type of customer I am. The better that communication ... the better they know how to take care of my customer needs.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 12:38 PM
|
#8
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,221
|
Sure, the hobbyists should charge too.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 01:23 PM
|
#9
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 10, 2011
Location: Rochester
Posts: 5,587
|
I don't have a problem with it. Seems a good way to verify guys. Having to get references is getting annoying.
Probably won't happen though. Too many frail egos.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 03:08 PM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 26, 2010
Location: OKC
Posts: 2,914
|
I believe the board owner has said no to this more than once.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-10-2016, 08:54 PM
|
#11
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 16, 2010
Location: Inside beautiful women.
Posts: 4,028
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T
The concept comes up every few months. While it sounds reasonable and equitable, there are too many guys with fragile egos to ever see it implemented here.
Wait a little while and all the typical arguments will come out, and you may well be attacked for "not understanding the rules".
But it is a good suggestion anyway.
|
Old-T is right. With all the fragile male egos, your likely to lose a client or a potential client if you say anything that rubs him the wrong way, and it won't matter how many orgasms you fake if he's thinking about what you honestly said of him.
I know some ladies have read comments in reviews and decided they would not see a particular client for that reason.
Especially if he says she's portly, or has cottage cheese thighs.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-11-2016, 12:12 PM
|
#12
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,221
|
I can't see a good reason for it. Hobbyists aren't marketing themselves. Could it benefit providers? Probably not. Those reviews would probably less reliable than hobbyists reviews of providers. Providers have ways to verify hobbyists. The smart ones do anyway.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-11-2016, 10:00 PM
|
#13
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 27, 2016
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 5
|
I actually love the idea. I'd like to know what they think about me just as much as I'm sure they like to know what what we think about them.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-12-2016, 09:07 AM
|
#14
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 347996
Join Date: May 9, 2016
Location: Houston
Posts: 367
My ECCIE Reviews
|
What goes on in the powder room never stays in the powder room. Please! This board is full of leaks... We all know that.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-12-2016, 01:20 PM
|
#15
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 10, 2011
Location: Rochester
Posts: 5,587
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
I can't see a good reason for it. Hobbyists aren't marketing themselves. Could it benefit providers? Probably not. Those reviews would probably less reliable than hobbyists reviews of providers. Providers have ways to verify hobbyists. The smart ones do anyway.
|
It would just make verifying guys easier. If a guy gets reviewed other gals can see it. It could reduce the need for references and screening. Probably a moot point since it's not going to happen. Even if it did I have a feeling most gals wouldn't do it anyways.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|