Looks like Trump is going to do what he said

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by BigLouie

It will be impossible for Trump to stop manufacturing jobs from disappearing... the “job intensity” of America’s manufacturing industries—and especially its best-paying advanced ones—is only going to decline... no one should be under the illusion that millions of manufacturing jobs are coming back to America.

Originally Posted by BigLouie

Over the next decade, nearly 3½ million manufacturing jobs will likely be needed, and 2 million are expected to go unfilled due to the skills gap.

Er, Louie... your last two posts are contradictory. They can't BOTH be true. Wanna try again?

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by bambino

It was Bush who initiated the auto bailout you

https://www.google.com/amp/www.newyo...automakers/amp

From your link: Obama not only gave them money, he forced changes in leadership and made GM get rid brands that were not profitable. Bush43 made the first loan, Obama did the most work to save GM and Chrysler. Obama did not have to continue with the bailout. He could have stopped, which is what most repubtards like Mitt wanted.

From the link:

Obama, who in December, 2008, was the President-elect, publicly supported Bush’s move, saying it was a “necessary step to avoid a collapse in our auto industry that would have devastating consequences for our economy and our workers.” After taking office six weeks later, Obama put together an auto task force that extended tens of billions more in emergency financing to Detroit over the ensuing months, and also did what appears to have been a pretty good job in restructuring G.M. and selling Chrysler to Fiat.
Obama deserves a lot of credit for finishing the job that Bush and his Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, had started. He stood with the auto companies, which were victims of extraordinary circumstances beyond their control. As the price of the bailout, he also insisted on some changes at G.M., including the installation of new leadership and the elimination of several brands.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

From your link: Obama not only gave them money, forced changes in leadership and made GM get rid brands that were not profitable. Bush43 made the first loan, Obama did the most work to save GM and Chrysler. Obama did not have to continue with the bailout. He could have stopped, which is what most repubtards like Mitt wanted.

From the link:

Obama, who in December, 2008, was the President-elect, publicly supported Bush’s move, saying it was a “necessary step to avoid a collapse in our auto industry that would have devastating consequences for our economy and our workers.” After taking office six weeks later, Obama put together an auto task force that extended tens of billions more in emergency financing to Detroit over the ensuing months, and also did what appears to have been a pretty good job in restructuring G.M. and selling Chrysler to Fiat.
Obama deserves a lot of credit for finishing the job that Bush and his Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, had started. He stood with the auto companies, which were victims of extraordinary circumstances beyond their control. As the price of the bailout, he also insisted on some changes at G.M., including the installation of new leadership and the elimination of several brands.

Yeah, it was Bush who initiated the bailout. You agree right? But a bankruptcy and reorganization would have worked too. So what's your point? Obama is a genius? Not really.