BP in the news

[NaughtyLittleNative]

Originally Posted by hotrix1

Not all women. Not by any means. Providers like you, Sally(SqueakyD), Autumn FOxx, Laney, Addie Nash would never be in this category.

Unlike the indiscreetly blatant ones that garner the attention of LE by their high flying antics, willing to risk anything for the notoriety. With no regard to anyone else getting burned if she does get popped in public. You've never seen me write such a disparaging remark on anyone else have you?

I would never call such providers, that don't burn clients, by such an ugly term. You in particular should know that by now even though we've never met. You don't show off face pics covered in man-goo do you? Didn't think so. You're much classier than that. And I do make a distinction between the two. What you do BCD is one thing, trying to gain Pornstar notoriety so explicitly, however might attract the wrong attention from otherwise unaware LE, since we don't really know who's in here looking in Eccie now do we?

And the fact that discretion in public and avoiding the limelight to prevent the attention of LE towards Eccie being the part of the topic regarding BP's recent troubles, had, some bearing on the aforementioned indiscreet PROVIDER then. Since you object to the use of the term "whore" in specific, my apologies to you young lady.

I understand where youre coming from and accept your apology. Youre a sweetheart, just the use of that word rubs me the wrong way. Xo NLN

[SaltyDog71]

Now that everyone is all happy again, can we just have a big gang bang and call it all good?

[hotrix1]

Originally Posted by NaughtyLittleNative

I understand where youre coming from and accept your apology. Youre a sweetheart, just the use of that word rubs me the wrong way. Xo NLN

You know that even if I'm an asshole, I'm at least a discriminating asshole. And I do make a strong distinction between a professional provider and the garden variety ho.

Thanks sweetie. And furthermore...... And that includes trolls, wk's and fanboys.

[hotrix1]

Originally Posted by SaltyDog71

Now that everyone is all happy again, can we just have a big gang bang and call it all good?

So long as I don't have to put up with whiny WK's and fanboys.

[NaughtyLittleNative]

Originally Posted by SaltyDog71

Now that everyone is all happy again, can we just have a big gang bang and call it all good?

Dont u threten us with a good time now

[Cpalmson]

Originally Posted by SaltyDog71

Now that everyone is all happy again, can we just have a big gang bang and call it all good?

Just as long as it is not a sausage festival

[hotrix1]

Originally Posted by Cpalmson

Just as long as it is not a sausage festival

Not with NLN in the middle it won't be. Missed the last bang. Might have to be at the next.

[SaltyDog71]

Originally Posted by hotrix1

Not with NLN in the middle it won't be. Missed the last bang. Might have to be at the next.

Beat you to that one to Hotrix. Your slacking sir. Time to catch up.

[hotrix1]

Originally Posted by SaltyDog71

Beat you to that one to Hotrix. Your slacking sir. Time to catch up.

I know, I know

You sir, are such a DAWG.

[xmaster]

Back on topic: http://www.courthousenews.com/2016/1...t-of-court.htm

A federal judge…threw out Backpage.com’s claim that the U.S. attorney general is enforcing an unconstitutional law against [sex work] advertising…Backpage challenged the constitutionality of the Stop Advertising Victims of Exploitation Act…[because] it feared prosecution if it did not comply with the law by removing the “adult” category from its website…U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton…said the company lacks standing. “Backpage.com has not presented evidence that Congress sought to eliminate all advertisements of a sexual nature…through the adoption of the SAVE Act; rather, the legislation is directed only at those advertisements concerning illegal sex trafficking”…Backpage has said it screens, blocks and removes such content…[so] it cannot allege that it would be burdened by compliance measures in this case. Backpage attorney Robert Corn-Revere portrayed the ruling as a sort of win for his client. “We are gratified that the court recognized that prosecution…requires actual knowledge that criminal activity is going on”…

[xmaster]

Looks like the California case got tossed:
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2016/11/16/c...r-escort-site/