Are you happy now IFFY? Start saying it: "President Hillary Clinton"

[dilbert firestorm]

just for kicks

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Revenant

First, you DIDN"T refute me point-by-point. You simply ignored the article I posted and gave me your own (useless) analysis.

Lemme get this straight.... I countered your lame arguments point-by-point, you were too chickenshit to respond, and now you want us to believe you weren't refuted?

Hey Baghdad Bob, you just got carpet-bombed... and you say you're winning?

You are completely ignorant when it comes to economics. You post articles because you can't explain what you don't understand. And you're too fucking dense to grasp anything remotely subtle, like how the collapse of Lehman Brothers turned what could have been a modest recession into an economic free-fall.

My analysis is supported by empirical data. You have nothing. Your “analysis” is as worthless as your dick.


Second, I never had a problem with your embedded rebuttals before because I don't ever recall seeing you post one before. It is usually the tranny fuckee who does that. But, you are in good company, mope.

Here you go, you lying mope.... See my embedded comments at posts #42 and #51.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1636845


Really, you don't challenge it? Because you did when I made the exact same point. Why was it bad when I stated that the recession began in December 2007, but OK when NBER stated it?

I don't challenge you OR the NBER on when the recession began. You originally referred to the “2007 financial meltdown”. I pointed out that the financial system didn't melt down until Lehman Brothers went bankrupt in September 2008, sending the economy into a tailspin. Dating everything as 2007 is stupid and incorrect. Nearly all of the financial stresses and economic pain erupted in 2008/09. Fuck it, in October 2007 the Dow Jones Average even hit an all-time high - and stocks are a leading (not lagging) indicator!


Trying to backtrack on your earlier post while trying to look like you are NOT backtracking makes you look worse.

MOPE.

You're the mope who is backtracking. Now you pretend you were talking about when the recession began, instead of claiming everything started and ended in 2007.


Just take any economist?

I think you have this wrong - again. In my last post, I asked you to cite any reputable source that said the Great Recession began at the end of 2008. And guess what? You still haven't!

How many times do I have to repeat myself? I'm not talking about when it began. I'm telling you when it hit us in full force! Every reputable economist agrees with me because my conclusions are based on empirical data (for annualized real GDP) compiled by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Here you go again, mope:

Q1 2008: -2.7%
Q2 2008: +2.0%
Q3 2008: -1.9%
Q4 2008: -8.2%
Q1 2009: -5.4%
Q2 2009: -0.5%
Q3 2009: +1.3%


Instead, you change the subject by telling me to ask any economist what an 8.2% drop in GDP means in plain English.

Gee, let me take a guess. In plain English, an 8.2% drop in GDP means that there was an 8.2% drop in GDP. How's that?

That's called being a redundant idiot.


Plummeting? Cratering? Nosedive? What are you a drama queen? Are any of those terms quantifiable? Or just hysterics? Is there an argument in there somewhere?

Let's try this, dipshit – I will take you out and push you off a 5-foot cliff. Then I'll push you off a 50-foot cliff. If you survive the latter fall, you can crawl back in and explain the difference between them.


I can tell you'd rather avoid a straight answer when it comes to economics. FOREVER.

I can tell when it comes to economics you prefer to keep getting your ass pounded. FOREVER.


Strawman argument.

I never said when the "brunt" of anything occurred. I made the SIMPLE point that the Great Recession lasted from December 2007 until mid 2009.

No, you originally said the “2007 financial meltdown”. I cut you some slack by suggesting you meant the “brunt” of it, but if you meant ALL of it occurred in 2007 you look even stupider.


I also made the SIMPLE point that the real estate market was going south earlier in 2007 as the mortgage defaults soared.

Your actual quote was “in 2006-2007 mortgage defaults soared”. I already produced a graph showing that defaults declined in 2006, rose again moderately in 2007, and finally soared in 2008 and 2009. Here's the graph again, mope, try to comprehend the slope of the lines for each period:




It was you who swaggered into the conversation like a know-it-all when you tried to tell us the recession wasn't until the end of 2008. CLEARLY NOT TRUE.

Lol... there's your strawman argument.

Keep trying, mope.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Keep trying, mope.

I told you he was a fucking idiot.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Trumps going to be your daddy, ir·rel·e·vant. Well him and Lustylad...

[Revenant]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

U B Homo the tranny fuckee that is superciliously stupid and of no consequence, you Yankee, dick-sucking prick that tried to reinvent yourself with a new handle popularly associated with a 19th century slave trader.

Post a review. Of a woman, you tranny fuckee. If you can afford one.

6 years, 5 months, 20 days since your last review. And that was of another dude. You are a tranny fuckee. The AIDS is destroying your brain.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Revenant

Post a review. Of a woman, you tranny fuckee. If you can afford one.

6 years, 5 months, 20 days since your last review. And that was of another dude. You are a tranny fuckee. The AIDS is destroying your brain.

U B Homo the tranny fuckee that wouldn't be interested in women, you Yankee, dick-sucking prick that tried to reinvent yourself with a new handle popularly associated with a 19th century slave trader.

[Revenant]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Trumps going to be your daddy, ir·rel·e·vant. Well him and Lustylad...

Trump is about to be Hillarys bitch, you dumb hillbilly.

His own campaign manager is finally admitting he is down by a lot.

Lustylad is a pseudo intellect pretending to be an economist.

He keeps changing his story and taking quotes out of context to try to win an argument.

LustyLad is the king of straw man arguments.

IBHankering is the queen of strawman arguments, of course.

You are too stupid to raise any arguments, so you post video links.

All three of you are mopes.

[Revenant]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

U B Homo the tranny fuckee that wouldn't be interested in women, you Yankee, dick-sucking prick that tried to reinvent yourself with a new handle popularly associated with a 19th century slave trader.

Check out my RECENT reviews of REAL women, you Confederate faggot.

Your review of Nawlins trannies don't measure up.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Revenant

Check out my RECENT reviews of REAL women, you Confederate faggot.

Your review of Nawlins trannies don't measure up.

U B Homo the tranny fuckee that lives in a fantasy world and superciliously makes up shit, you Yankee, dick-sucking prick that tried to reinvent yourself with a new handle popularly associated with a 19th century slave trader.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Kelly Ann will grab you by your ir·rel·e·vant PUSSY, 0zombie Lover

[Yssup Rider]

Holdon deah jes a seccin!

Did you change your line of insult, IBMassa?

Seems a might differn to me now!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Revenant

Lustylad is a pseudo intellect pretending to be an economist.

You're a fucking New Yawk retread pretending he should be taken seriously in Texas. No hat and no cattle.

[i'va biggen]

Wasn't the expression all hat and no cattle?

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Wasn't the expression all hat and no cattle?

Very good, ekim!

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Very good, ekim!


[