Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70799
biomed163414
Yssup Rider61090
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48716
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42907
The_Waco_Kid37240
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-14-2016, 05:03 PM   #16
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
So do Hillarious, Obaminable, and Billinsky. The Three Stooges!

I guess you caught the blurb on Hillarious ... about her failing the DC bar exam!
No, but she is probably still mad the assholes made her take it after graduating from Yale. She should have just been handed her license, she is so fucking smart.
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 05:04 PM   #17
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
how else could the security on the secure system be breached?
It's relatively simple, actually. "Print" a password protected document to a pdf file and then send the pdf file to the server, which will then open up without the necessity of a password. The computer "believes" it's printing, but it's really copying. If you attempt to "copy" the document, the password protection will also be copied. Further more once it's in a pdf format it can be redacted to eliminate any unwanted information ... like the classification "heading", as well as the "source"! (What will not be changed will be the embedded metadata in the "file" showing the source of the creation of the "new file"!) You can't change or redact the heading on the password protected document.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 05:45 PM   #18
The_Waco_Kid
AKA President Trump
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,240
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
It's relatively simple, actually. "Print" a password protected document to a pdf file and then send the pdf file to the server, which will then open up without the necessity of a password. The computer "believes" it's printing, but it's really copying. If you attempt to "copy" the document, the password protection will also be copied. Further more once it's in a pdf format it can be redacted to eliminate any unwanted information ... like the classification "heading", as well as the "source"! (What will not be changed will be the embedded metadata in the "file" showing the source of the creation of the "new file"!) You can't change or redact the heading on the password protected document.

that sounds reasonable. no password, no problem! which means that Clinton's entire staff regularly circumvented proper security protocol. no wonder they are all lawyering up!

Mills is a real piece of work! she's now claiming attorney-client privilege when she was questioned. nice!

Pagliano is in danger of having his immunity agreement voided because he intends to "plead the 5th" .. even with immunity, while he has it.

wonderful crew Ms. Clinton surrounded herself with! let's vote them into the White House! NOT.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 06:01 PM   #19
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

I think you are making this much harder than necessary. Without evil intent those e-mails would never have gotten to her personal account.

WITH evil intent the lower tech versions work quite well. Passwords on individual documents is typically not an issue--the access to the network is assumed to be the equivalent or better protection. Of course when you give access to scum with no morals, well then you have no protection.

Print. Scan to the other system into Word. Remove the inconvenient words. Print and scan again if you wish. Send.
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 06:28 PM   #20
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T View Post
Print. Scan to the other system into Word. Remove the inconvenient words. Print and scan again if you wish. Send.
When you move to a scanner you are then making another electronic copy in the scanner memory, which then ends up creating four documents marked classified that much be located and deleted from the system, which is contained in a "system wide" word processing program.

Too many "pecker" tracks!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 06:41 PM   #21
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
that sounds reasonable. no password, no problem! which means that Clinton's entire staff regularly circumvented proper security protocol. no wonder they are all lawyering up!

Mills is a real piece of work! she's now claiming attorney-client privilege when she was questioned. nice!

Pagliano is in danger of having his immunity agreement voided because he intends to "plead the 5th" .. even with immunity, while he has it.

wonderful crew Ms. Clinton surrounded herself with! let's vote them into the White House! NOT.
Remember Vince Foster...
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 06:45 PM   #22
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
When you move to a scanner you are then making another electronic copy in the scanner memory, which then ends up creating four documents marked classified that much be located and deleted from the system, which is contained in a "system wide" word processing program.

Too many "pecker" tracks!
That depends.....
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 07:40 PM   #23
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T View Post
There are only two possibilities for her:

1. The most likely. She directed people to strip all portion markings (which are just the way of identifying what is classified, and how classified it is) before sending them to her. The stripping of the markings is itself against all regs and a clear indication that the players all KNEW it was seriously wrong. In this case they should include conspiracy as well as willfully putting US lives at risk (given the nature of some of the info involved) and doing "great harm to the United States". But she clearly thinks her personal convenience is more important than lives and the safety of the country.

or

2. Even though she had original classification authority--the authority to determine that it was classified--she was incapable of applying the most basic classification principles and was too stupid to recognize the material for what it was. A first year in the government GG-1 would have known several of the e-mails she received were highly classified, markings or not. And the basic rule is if you suspect classified is out of the proper channels you protect it and report it. Personally, though she is an evil person, she is not stupid and this option--that she didn't recognize it--is beyond belief.

So: incompetent and stupid at best, criminally conspiratorial at worst.

But many will still vote for her regardless.
1. and 2. are basically the same. It's the difference between "arrogantly criminal" and "criminally arrogant."
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 08:48 PM   #24
The_Waco_Kid
AKA President Trump
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,240
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
1. and 2. are basically the same. It's the difference between "arrogantly criminal" and "criminally arrogant."
and while we're at it, let's throw in "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

ahahaha
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved