Why Hillary will obliterate Drumpf.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

What kind of money you talking bimbo? Or you want the old welsher bet?

No money Smalls, loser leaves the forum for 90 days. Just like a ban. My money's on Trump. You can have the field.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Some interesting points brought up on CNN last night during the election returns. In 1988 GHW Bush won 58% of the white vote and won easily. In 2012, Romney won 58% of the white vote and got trounced. Trump has not exactly endeared himself with the Hispanic and black voters and will need to focus on doing so.

Second point made -- the key battleground states in 2016 are supposed to be Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Pennsylvania and if Trump is to win he must move some of those 4 states from Blue to Red. Unlikely that California or New York will go Republican. Possibly Florida will go Republican, but doubtful. Other states are pretty predictable or too small to make a difference.

Republican voters in the Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio and Florida primaries already turned out in greater numbers than Dim-retards.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Republican voters in the Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio and Florida primaries already turned out in greater numbers than Dim-retards.

Primary turnout is meaningless. How many of the states you mention have primaries in which you can pick up a Republican or Democrat ballot despite how you are registered?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Primary turnout is meaningless. How many of the states you mention have primaries in which you can pick up a Republican or Democrat ballot despite how you are registered?

Didn't see where you proffered a better indicator than your worthless opinion, speedy.

[LexusLover]

She can't even "obliterate" Sanders.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Maybe if anyone with the handle biggiesmalls shows up then he can bet him.

Yeah right, you cowardly Kansas cunt. Biggiesmalls is you, chimp littledick. Time for you to chimp out!

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Didn't see where you proffered a better indicator than your worthless opinion, speedy.

Idiot. I didn't give an opinion as to who would win the 4 states. I simply restated what CNN said last night -- that those 4 states would be pivotal if Trump wants to win the election in November. Idiot. Learn how to read AND comprehend what is being stated.

Let's review FACTS and what I consider to be a better indicator than how voting went in the primaries:

Michigan -- has not been red since 1988. Obama got 54.2% of the vote in 2012.

Ohio -- This state has gone with the winner in at least the last 10 elections. Needless to say this state is ultra-important to win.

Wisconsin -- Has not gone Republican since Reagan in 1984. Obama got 7% more of the votes than Romney in 2012. 14% more than McCain in 2008.

Pennsylvania -- Has not gone Republican since 1988.

My OPINION is that Ohio and Pennsylvania are the most likely of the 4 states to move from blue to red, if any are to move. Michigan is the least likely.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Idiot. I didn't give an opinion as to who would win the 4 states. I simply restated what CNN said last night -- that those 4 states would be pivotal if Trump wants to win the election in November. Idiot. Learn how to read AND comprehend what is being stated.

Let's review FACTS and what I consider to be a better indicator than how voting went in the primaries:

Michigan -- has not been red since 1988. Obama got 54.2% of the vote in 2012.

Ohio -- This state has gone with the winner in at least the last 10 elections. Needless to say this state is ultra-important to win.

Wisconsin -- Has not gone Republican since Reagan in 1984. Obama got 7% more of the votes than Romney in 2012. 14% more than McCain in 2008.

Pennsylvania -- Has not gone Republican since 1988.

My OPINION is that Ohio and Pennsylvania are the most likely of the 4 states to move from blue to red, if any are to move. Michigan is the least likely.

You forgot Florida.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Idiot. I didn't give an opinion as to who would win the 4 states. I simply restated what CNN said last night -- that those 4 states would be pivotal if Trump wants to win the election in November. Idiot. Learn how to read AND comprehend what is being stated.

Let's review FACTS and what I consider to be a better indicator than how voting went in the primaries:

Michigan -- has not been red since 1988. Obama got 54.2% of the vote in 2012.

Ohio -- This state has gone with the winner in at least the last 10 elections. Needless to say this state is ultra-important to win.

Wisconsin -- Has not gone Republican since Reagan in 1984. Obama got 7% more of the votes than Romney in 2012. 14% more than McCain in 2008.

Pennsylvania -- Has not gone Republican since 1988.

My OPINION is that Ohio and Pennsylvania are the most likely of the 4 states to move from blue to red, if any are to move. Michigan is the least likely.

Fact, it is neither 1984 nor 1988, Ohio, Michigan, Florida and Wisconsin all have Republican governors, and the dim-retard favorite, HILDEBEEST -- a demonstrably incompetent, septuagenarian liar who is being investigated by the FBI -- is not Odumbo, speedy.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by bambino

You forgot Florida.

The CNN analyst did not consider Florida up for grabs. He believes it will stay blue. I would agree more with you that it is very possible for Trump to win in Florida.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Fact, it is neither 1984 nor 1988, Ohio, Michigan, Florida and Wisconsin all have Republican governors, and the dim-retard favorite, HILDEBEEST -- a demonstrably incompetent, septuagenarian liar who is being investigated by the FBI -- is not Odumbo, speedy.

Clinton is closer to Obama than Trump, so the odds are greater that someone who voted for Obama, and still supports him, will vote for Clinton.

Trump continues to make ridiculously stupid comments (much like you). Just yesterday he cites an article in The National Enquirer, that's THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER people, in which an article linked the father of Ted Cruz to Lee Harvey Oswald, as true. And last night in his victory speech, he was telling everyone how great Ted and Heidi Cruz are. This after he compared his trophy wife to Heidi Cruz and then admitted it was a mistake. Just last week Trump threatened to "spill the beans" on Heidi Cruz, whatever that meant.

Point is Trump can be just as bad as Clinton. This is going to be one of the dirtiest Presidential campaigns in decades IMHO.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Clinton is closer to Obama than Trump, so the odds are greater that someone who voted for Obama, and still supports him, will vote for Clinton.

Trump continues to make ridiculously stupid comments (much like you). Just yesterday he cites an article in The National Enquirer, that's THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER people, in which an article linked the father of Ted Cruz to Lee Harvey Oswald, as true. And last night in his victory speech, he was telling everyone how great Ted and Heidi Cruz are. This after he compared his trophy wife to Heidi Cruz and then admitted it was a mistake. Just last week Trump threatened to "spill the beans" on Heidi Cruz, whatever that meant.

Point is Trump can be just as bad as Clinton. This is going to be one of the dirtiest Presidential campaigns in decades IMHO.

You obviously missed -- or are mendaciously ignoring -- Hildebeest's stupid comments about putting coal mine workers out of work, "CP Time" and her latest jewel, with conspicuous racist overtones, about how some people shouldn't be allowed "off the reservation", speedy. Trump, and other Republicans, are already using her coal miner remarks against her with some effect, speedy.

Hildebeest Hears Wrath of Coal Supporters in West Virginia (NYT)

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You obviously missed -- or are mendaciously ignoring -- Hildebeest's stupid comments about putting coal mine workers out of work, "CP Time" and her latest jewel about how some people shouldn't be allowed "off the reservation", speedy. Trump, and other Republicans, are already using her coal miner remarks against her with some effect, speedy.

I distinctly said both sides will be using negativity in their campaigns. And there is plenty on both sides to bring out.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I distinctly said both sides will be using negativity in their campaigns. And there is plenty on both sides to bring out.

But then you went on to criticize Trump for particular remarks while, by omission, you mean to suggest that Hildebeest's racially charged faux pas are not stupid.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Clinton is closer to Obama than Trump, so the odds are greater that someone who voted for Obama, and still supports him, will vote for Clinton.

Trump continues to make ridiculously stupid comments (much like you). Just yesterday he cites an article in The National Enquirer, that's THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER people, in which an article linked the father of Ted Cruz to Lee Harvey Oswald, as true. And last night in his victory speech, he was telling everyone how great Ted and Heidi Cruz are. This after he compared his trophy wife to Heidi Cruz and then admitted it was a mistake. Just last week Trump threatened to "spill the beans" on Heidi Cruz, whatever that meant.

Point is Trump can be just as bad as Clinton. This is going to be one of the dirtiest Presidential campaigns in decades IMHO.

Yes, I believe it will be a dirty campaign. May the best man win...