SC Review guidelines.

[CTYankee]

I recently wrote a strip club review of a dancer that was rejected for PA because there weren't any extras. I'm not complaining and I wasn't surprised; I knew the rules - no extras no PA. I posted the review anyway because

A-I thought it was a great experience even without the extras and
B-If extras are that important to you then Michelle probably isn't your girl.

Thinking about it later I realized that if I were a little less honest - and more hungry for PA - I could have called her M******e, claimed she gave me a bbbj or l1 or whatever and added YMMV and nobody would have been the wiser. I'm thinking that review guidelines that encourage dishonest reviews may not be in the best interest of the members. Thoughts?

P.S. the review was for Michelle of XTC in Austin if anybody's interested.

[DakineOne777]

Don't feel so bad.
At least you didn't get your review rejected because you had the audacity to BE A FEMALE.

[SpiceItUp]

So your suggestion is that the Strip Club reviews get bogged down with reviews of dudes getting a regular lapdance?

What possible value would that have for members of an escort site who are presumably looking for info on girls who are down to fuck for money?

[Guest110416]

SC reviews are a part of the Eccie community so guys who chose to them can, but there a few drawbacks to writing them with nothing other than gaining PA as a positive for writing one.

One drawback is, since you have to give a DETAILED physical description, what shift she works and the first initial of her last name, the reviews are not anonymous when it pertains to the dancer so anyone can ascertain who the dancer is, including family members will confront, managers will fire and guys who are not so scrupulous can seek her out and expose her.

Another is, just as the OP pointed out, because SC reviews cannot be verified one way or the other with the stripper, not only can guys make up a story for PA, but also guys with agendas can say it is a fake review to get a reaction and then RTM the reactive post. If you make up your experience to get PA, and a guy can easily find out who that stripper is, when he goes to see her and requests or expects the same as the review, without giving knowledge of the review, and she is not willing, he may just take it. So, a little embellishment here and there is ok (everyone does it, even on all reviews), but a very bad idea to post a review with activities that did not occur.

[CTYankee]

Another thing is - Maybe it's just me, but sometimes a dancer can be beautiful and charming and sexy and able to make me think that she's really enjoying dancing for me and it can be a great time even without the extras. Maybe I just want to go home to my wife with an extra twinkle in my eye.
Maybe PA could be stricter in other ways - you have to describe the club layout - any parking issues - whatever. I think making PA contingent on extras just invites cheating.

[DakineOne777]

Originally Posted by CTYankee

Another thing is - Maybe it's just me, but sometimes a dancer can be beautiful and charming and sexy and able to make me think that she's really enjoying dancing for me and it can be a great time even without the extras. Maybe I just want to go home to my wife with an extra twinkle in my eye.
Maybe PA could be stricter in other ways - you have to describe the club layout - any parking issues - whatever. I think making PA contingent on extras just invites cheating.

FWIW, I totally agree with you.
But don't hold your breath since they refuse to change anything here. They are stuck in their way of doing things and will just dig their heels in deeper if called upon to improve anything that isn't "their" way.