NARAL Going Ballistic Over Super Bowl Ad

[Jackie S]

How stupid can these people be. They tweeted, "the ad humanizes a fetus".

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...-super-bowl-ad

Good Lord. The Ad is cute, light hearted, rather silly, and in no way made as a "anti-abortion" Ad.

But the Pro Abortion Crowd's fear that the truth about abortion might finally be realized has made them anal to the point of the absurd.

Wouldn't it be a twist if the national conscience was awakened by a rather innocuous TV Ad, and young women actually began to realize that what was inside them was more than just a "clump of cells"?

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

How stupid can these people be. They tweeted, "the ad humanizes a fetus".

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...-super-bowl-ad

Good Lord. The Ad is cute, light hearted, rather silly, and in no way made as a "anti-abortion" Ad.

But the Pro Abortion Crowd's fear that the truth about abortion might finally be realized has made them anal to the point of the absurd.

Wouldn't it be a twist if the national conscience was awakened by a rather innocuous TV Ad, and young women actually began to realize that what was inside them was more than just a "clump of cells"?

NARAL is stupid, can't argue that. But young women know they have a baby inside of them, some just don't want to have that baby.

What has always puzzled me is that if the Repubs want these young women to follow through with the birth of an unwanted child so bad, why haven't they came up with legislation that would support these unwanted babies? They have control of the house and senate, why no law?

[i'va biggen]

It was a funny ad, LMAO .

[filbone]

What has always puzzled me is that if the Repubs want these young women to follow through with the birth of an unwanted child so bad, why haven't they came up with legislation that would support these unwanted babies? They have control of the house and senate, why no law?[/QUOTE]

There is already a method. It's called adoption.

You can't legally kill a human being just because you don't want him around.

An interesting part about NARAL's objection is that the baby at full-term. The doctor says Any minute now. Even when a kid is just about to enter the world, pro-abortionists still can't call it a baby.

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by filbone

There is already a method. It's called adoption.

You can't legally kill a human being just because you don't want him around.

An interesting part about NARAL's objection is that the baby at full-term. The doctor says Any minute now. Even when a kid is just about to enter the world, pro-abortionists still can't call it a baby.

I meant a working method. There are over 400K kids in America that nobody wants to adopt. Your, I really care, but not enough to do anything about it attitude is exactly why Planned Parenthood keeps getting funded, by the Republicans who control the house and senate I may add.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

NARAL is stupid, can't argue that. But young women know they have a baby inside of them, some just don't want to have that baby.

What has always puzzled me is that if the Repubs want these young women to follow through with the birth of an unwanted child so bad, why haven't they came up with legislation that would support these unwanted babies? They have control of the house and senate, why no law?

With the availability of the "morning after pilll" and other common sense means of birth control, there should be no such a thing as an unwanted pregnancy. This is 2016.

Educating young men and women is the key.

NARAL seems to be against anything that would stifle their Billion+ dollar a year abortion industry.

[Yssup Rider]

Looks like snack maker missed funny bones on both sides of this issue. In fact, it sounds like YOU boys is going ballistic over it.

I thought it was a funny spot ... Good Super Bowl commercial.

Now please go back to bickering and meeting over non-chipsanddips things, like the chipsanddipshits you are!

LMAO!

[DSK]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

NARAL is stupid, can't argue that. But young women know they have a baby inside of them, some just don't want to have that baby.

What has always puzzled me is that if the Repubs want these young women to follow through with the birth of an unwanted child so bad, why haven't they came up with legislation that would support these unwanted babies? They have control of the house and senate, why no law?

Do you understand that they don't want someone who is responsible for the baby to kill it? I don't assume support of someone else's baby just because I don't want to kill it?


If I don't want you to kill Assup, does that mean I have to take care of him for the next 18 years?

The fucking parents are responsible for their kids....if not, next in line are the grandparents, if they can.

Then, a fucking orphanage......more soup please!!!!

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by filbone

What has always puzzled me is that if the Repubs want these young women to follow through with the birth of an unwanted child so bad, why haven't they came up with legislation that would support these unwanted babies? They have control of the house and senate, why no law?

There is already a method. It's called adoption.

You can't legally kill a human being just because you don't want him around.

An interesting part about NARAL's objection is that the baby at full-term. The doctor says Any minute now. Even when a kid is just about to enter the world, pro-abortionists still can't call it a baby.[/QUOTE]

Why hasn't the right come up with a law? Because, so far, the right is not the progressive left who thinks that every aspect of life should some how be tied to government. You know the reverse of your argument? That the right (in appreciation of the left way of doing things) puts women (and men) in jail for creating an "unwanted" child. I guess that would make the left happy for the government to take on the role of guardian to everyone.

As for as NARAL's actions, just go to show you how evil they are. That they consider an abortion on a baby that is about to be born and not to consider it human.

[Guest042616-1]

Pretty stupid for NARAL to get upset over this video. I'm a firm believer of a woman's right to choose, but this is clearly just a (funny) joke.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by Jackie

[url

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/430948/doritos-pro-life-super-bowl-ad[/url]

Good Lord. The Ad is cute, light hearted, rather silly, and in no way made as a "anti-abortion" Ad.

This is what I said about the Ad.

The rest of my OP was about NARAL's asinine response.

[Yssup Rider]

Horseshit. You posted about the "pro-abortion crowd." And your idea of the truth, opening the door to another joint meltdown by the usual group of hypocritical whoremongers who piss and moan about abortion.

I wasn't offended by the ad. But I was by your OP.

[JCM800]

What's their stance on Dorito's?

[JD Barleycorn]

NO, Sweet Chili right up to the birth.

[IIFFOFRDB]

The 0zombie King likes Doritos but Kenya don't like abortions...


fuckers