Appears to be an unmarked car outside a verified provider addy

[LeeBeezy]

Set up a meet for Nicole Cox.
Arrived to see a white Dodge Charge with police style led arrays in the front and back windows. Plates normal, not exempt. But then some registered uc cars have standard plates.
Provider insists it is HER car. Why the fck would a provider park a car in front of herbaddress with police lights in the window?
This isnt definitive, I know. But I think anyone in their right mind passes on this situation.
(appx at arapaho and tollway)

[Chung Tran]

http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=145083

overreacting.. she's been around a long time, many reviews.

if you're worried, you could ask her to start the engine.

[LeeBeezy]

I hope so. But not going back.
I hate to waste her time.
I will not risk myself though.
Makes no sense at all for a provider to have police led lihhts in a personal car.
Disagree if you like. I could give a damn

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by LeeBeezy

Makes no sense at all for a provider to have police led lihhts in a personal car.
Disagree if you like. I could give a damn

no argument from me.. I assume you asked her why.. did she give an explanation?

[LeeBeezy]

Nope. Just attacked my time on eccie vs hers.
I had a relativr in DPD for 23 years. Vice. Hom. Then management. I know how this CAN go. Provider is popped. Forced to set people up all day...
So fk that.
If im wrong, im wrong
But makes no sense at all to have pork-lights in what looks like a pork-ride. Then act like its not unusual.
Either a bad situation there. Or a really bad car-accessory choice.
Either way.... PASS!

[Chung Tran]

I would have passed too.. if someone can't (or won't) explain police lights, I'm gone.

[LeeBeezy]

Not to disagree. But there is no explaination that would matter. Police are allowed to say anything, true or not, to facilitate an investigation.
Its either 5.0 or a really really stupid thing to add to a providers car. Beyond stupid...

[Chung Tran]

I get your concern, especially with the background you posted.. she could be working somewhat involuntarily with LE.. if so, yes, an explanation is fruitless.. actually what bothers me more. is the response you said she gave to your question.. even if I believed it to be her car, that answer would have sent me packing..

[zebra]

non exempt tags should have registered with you and given you the green light. She is well known here in our community and you missed out on a wonderful afternoon. I would of thought maybe her S/O is a big truck oversize load escort along those lines before a cop or UC.

[LeeBeezy]

I can email someone a picture of the car if you want. I blocked out the licence plate, as the rest is public domain. Not exempt plates means nothing. Registered UC cars do not have to have plates that say Exempt...
The pic clearly shows the lights in the rear window, both sides. Image does not show through the car due to glare, but there are lights on the front dash as well...

[digitalbananna351]

Saw a porked up black style LE type car in Irving today with the inscription on the rear quarter panels "to assault and enslave"

It even had the search light on the drivers side a pillar.. looked like a ghetto inciting car to increase tension towards LE.... punked out tinted windows too

[catbanger]

You sure it wasn't her hooker shoes in the window?

[Hogsby]

Originally Posted by digitalbananna351

Saw a porked up black style LE type car in Irving today with the inscription on the rear quarter panels "to assault and enslave"

It even had the search light on the drivers side a pillar.. looked like a ghetto inciting car to increase tension towards LE.... punked out tinted windows too

That car probably belongs to an uber-fan of Transformers. The inscription you mention is on the Decepticon police car (named Barricade?) in the first movie.

[Nicole Cox]

Originally Posted by catbanger

You sure it wasn't her hooker shoes in the window?

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

I get your concern, especially with the background you posted.. she could be working somewhat involuntarily with LE.. if so, yes, an explanation is fruitless.. actually what bothers me more. is the response you said she gave to your question.. even if I believed it to be her car, that answer would have sent me packing..

NO, she couldn't be because she is a Jedi and she doesnt get down with the dark side.

Maybe if this guy stopped and asked and explained then he wouldve had all the info he needed before he bailed after wasting my time and before he posted an alert with misinformation in it.

Yes there is a cop car that is parked in my complex. And it belongs to a cop. He has to live somewhere. He is also considered oncall security after hours for my complex.

I also have a white charger AND NO it doesnt have police lights on it. Its the one with that was parked further down the driveway so that you could utilize my reserved space infront of MY building. Which you never made it to because instead of inquiring about the situation you jumped to paranoid conclusions and bounced without any consideration for my time you wasted..

When

[Nicole Cox]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=145083

overreacting.. she's been around a long time, many reviews.

if you're worried, you could ask her to start the engine.

I did point this out to LeeBeezy and I guess this is what he means by "attacked his time".
Like I originally said in THAT text to you LeeBeezy .."common sense goes a long ways."

And I also pointed out to him that maybe he should reconsider how he spends his sparetime. Because being labeled a time waster is going to get him blacklisted with reputable providers. Which I assume is why he put up this bs alert because his response was that he didnt care and could care less about eccie and this site is full of nothing but BS and fake reviews..

And this is the Type of BS he was referring to...
Get some big girl panties