Guess who's back? Back again?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

That is an incredibly poor summary of what you read, evidencing either a malicious interpretation designed to assign malice where there is none, or an incredibly dimwitted grasp of literacy and comprehension.

There's a famous quote, "Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity."

I do t know what is at play here, but you twisting my words is unwelcome.

I quoted exactly what you had written....if you think me malicious for quoting you and my summary, how about you explain why you think that.

Did you not review XOXO?

Did you not get banned?

Did you not use Fancy's computer to log into your account?

I think you know way more wtf is in play here than you are letting on. Though I think you are getting played here too. One thing might be happenstance but statistics tell me that something is not quite adding up with your review, your ban and you logging onto another's computer as all happenstance. But hey deniable plausibility is at the center of our justice system. .

[Guest072624]

Theres more drama on this board than All My Children on ABC. Smh. Stupid shit. Carry on kids.

[Island_Gent]

Well, glad it was resolved in your favour...welcome back sir.

[GlobeSpotter]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Is that a reference to Fancy? Potty mouth? Has she EVER uttered an expletive?

Fancy.....what got her banned?

A mod said it wasn't related to your log in situation.

[TravelingGentleman]

Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

Fancy.....what got her banned?

A mod said it wasn't related to your log in situation.

If an mod says they aren't related, I don't know what to tell you then. An admin told me i was banned for being her manhandle.

@WTF - I saw Fancy and Alyssa months apart. I wrote a review of Fancy aft r I saw her. Months later, I saw Alyssa. I wrote a review of Alyssa. I was banned 24-48 hours later for being a manhandle. I supposed they were related but after inquiries....I'm not sure what is and isn't allowed here (private chats with admin?) so I'll stop.

Maybe I'm getting played, but since I don't have a stake in the game, the outcome isn't relevant to me. I think I was collateral damage, but I'm back.

I've explained why I was banned, that it was reversed - all true. I don't want to get into any trouble so....I need to stick to safe facts and publicly available information.

[chicagoboy]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

I don't want to get into any trouble so....I need to stick to safe facts and publicly available information.

Good thincking.

[GlobeSpotter]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

.....
@WTF - I saw Fancy and Alyssa months apart. I wrote a review of Fancy aft r I saw her. Months later, I saw Alyssa. I wrote a review of Alyssa. I was banned 24-48 hours later for being a manhandle. I supposed they were related.......

Yeah....you pissed off all of Modville. They started foaming at the mouth that you joined the team and started going through your shit with a flea comb. The mac address was too easy.

It's hilarious. I'm flying her flag and, for that alone, they won't let me in the SH (Shit Hole). Edit: they're in there now talking about you.

Hint: you and Fancy need to get mac address and i.p. spoofers. I mean .... really.

Edit: so let's understand this better. 2 days after posting an Axoxo review, you get a lifetime ban for an offense committed 2 months prior.

newTG reports. You decide.

[Sarunga]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

I've explained why I was banned, that it was reversed - all true. I don't want to get into any trouble so....I need to stick to safe facts and publicly available information.

I'm curious to know which Mod executed the lifetime-ban on you....IF that info can be divulged in public without violating any guidelines.

Perhaps, Spice could tell us if TG is allowed to divulge that info?

[GlobeSpotter]

^^^^^^ mods collaborate before such action.

Even hip shooters.

[SpiceItUp]

TG's situation was handled at the admin level not the local moderator level, though we were of course kept in the loop as a courtesy.

People are completely free to discuss any details of their own rules violations that they wish to. Other people are completely free to make comments/speculate. It's just that mods don't discuss the details until someone else brings them up, that's all. There's no prohibition whatsoever on members talking about it or mods either once the information is brought to light by someone else.

Also, TG you can restate in your own words any private communications you may have had with anyone, member or staff, in order to tell your side of the story. As long as no direct quotes are made its not a problem. It's your prerogative.

[Sarunga]

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

TG's situation was handled at the admin level not the local moderator level, though we were of course kept in the loop as a courtesy.

So, the admin level that used to be at the local moderator level.

[SpiceItUp]

Some of the admins used to be local moderators if that's what you're getting at, but the entire admin team was involved in the process just like the entire local mod team is involved the deliberation and discussion regarding any locally handled ban.

[GlobeSpotter]

That's a good one Sarunga; especially for only 10:23p. You're usually and after-midnight kinda guy.

[rduke4923]

Originally Posted by Sarunga

So, the admin level that used to be at the local moderator level.

Either way what Spice is saying is TG has the green light to tell the story
With a few provisions. Long story short sounds like balls in his court.

[GlobeSpotter]

Maybe the hippo could address whether TG "the human" was banned for life or rather TG "the account" was banned for life because it appeared to be "a manhandle" and violate site terms on multiple accounts. Edit: and they didn't ban Fancy for having two accounts...one of which was a manhandle.

We've read so many times that eccie doesn't ban people for life.

I haven't looked at the dates, but I guess Fancy's potty-mouthed outing was coincidental in timing.