Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
400 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70831 | biomed1 | 63764 | Yssup Rider | 61312 | gman44 | 53378 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48841 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37431 | CryptKicker | 37231 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
09-06-2015, 03:44 AM
|
#151
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by southtown4488
leave it to conservative to drag things down to name calling and racism. They are just angry that they cant win this war on women, err the war on whats inside women. They cant win the war on gays, they cant win the war on minorities and immigrants. Theyre angry cause they think theyre losing "their" country, well if they see the country as belonging only to rich old white men. .. . then they are right, they have already lost.
|
You hit the nail on the head. They are consistently on the wrong side of history. And we're talking liberal and conservative, not republican and democrat. The conservative ideology by its very nature is to protect the status quo and bring about any change in a gradual manner. If they had their way, women and blacks would still be waiting to vote.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 05:39 AM
|
#152
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoSideGuy
It is conservatives that want to use the police powers of the state to force their perspective on others, while never having to answer the obvious questions regarding their beliefs. Now THAT is a religious attitude, if ever there was one. The liberal perspective on abortion is to leave the government out of these personal decisions. You are just repeating Fox News bullshit.
|
If the lib-retard perspective on abortion is to leave the government out of these personal decisions, then why the fuck is the government funding some 41% of PPH's budget -- $528.4 million -- to perform one third of this nation's abortions?
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 09:10 AM
|
#153
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,312
|
Last time I looked, legal abortion was the law of the land.
Even with the occasional acts of terror associated with it.
Like gay marriage.
Like separation of church and state.
Like brown people.
Like virtually EVERY fucking lynchpin issue for the RWWipes, it has NO BEARING on ability of America to succeed or fail as a nation.
Why not devote all the self-righteous energy to solving the problems of homelessness, a broken education system, rampant social decay, a toxic environment and an economic system that incentivizes greedy fuxtix to export jobs by the millions?
Face it, idiots. God made that book y'all live by. Let him fix this shit for you.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 09:29 AM
|
#154
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Public Law 113–76, January 17, 2014, 128 STAT. 5
SEC. 613. No funds appropriated by this Act [the ‘‘Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014’’] shall be available to pay for an abortion, or the administrative expenses in connection with any health plan under the Federal employees health benefits program which provides any benefits or coverage for abortions.
SEC. 810. None of the funds appropriated under this Act shall be expended for any abortion except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or where the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 10:40 AM
|
#155
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
If the lib-retard perspective on abortion is to leave the government out of these personal decisions, then why the fuck is the government funding some 41% of PPH's budget -- $528.4 million -- to perform one third of this nation's abortions?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Public Law 113–76, January 17, 2014, 128 STAT. 5
SEC. 613. No funds appropriated by this Act [the ‘‘Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014’’] shall be available to pay for an abortion, or the administrative expenses in connection with any health plan under the Federal employees health benefits program which provides any benefits or coverage for abortions.
SEC. 810. None of the funds appropriated under this Act shall be expended for any abortion except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or where the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.
|
What are you saying chicken dick? That your first post was a lie?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 11:30 AM
|
#156
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by southtown4488
leave it to conservative to drag things down to name calling and racism. They are just angry.... Theyre angry cause they think theyre losing "their" country, well if they see the country as belonging only to rich old white men....
|
Hey suckclown, here's the post where someone decided to "drag things down to name calling and racism".... he sounds angry too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by southtown4488
typical racist internet tough guy, u come on here to talk shit cause ur a cunt and a coward. Ur the kinda loser who shows up at work with a gun.
|
Is this what you mean by "old white men", suckclown?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 11:48 AM
|
#157
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
If the lib-retard perspective on abortion is to leave the government out of these personal decisions, then why the fuck is the government funding some 41% of PPH's budget -- $528.4 million -- to perform one third of this nation's abortions?
|
+1
You just exposed a massive contradiction. And the libtards can't even address it.
.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 12:50 PM
|
#158
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
What are you saying chicken dick? That your first post was a lie?
|
No, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, it's dick-suckers like you who are the liars when you disingenuously claim PPH isn't using American tax dollars to pay for abortions.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 02:30 PM
|
#159
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
No, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, it's dick-suckers like you who are the liars when you disingenuously claim PPH isn't using American tax dollars to pay for abortions.
|
Don't think you will ever find where I said that chicken dick, and quit trying to transfer your cocksucking ways on me .
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 02:45 PM
|
#160
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Don't think you will ever find where I said that chicken dick, and quit trying to transfer your cocksucking ways on me .
|
No, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, you'd be the disingenuous, lying, cock-sucking lib-retard just like you've always been.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 04:22 PM
|
#161
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
No, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, you'd be the disingenuous, lying, cock-sucking lib-retard just like you've always been.
|
No what, you fucking cocksucker? You are just another liberal dick sucker like you have always been, and you can't find where I said it can you chicken dick.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 04:28 PM
|
#162
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
No what, you fucking cocksucker? You are just another liberal dick sucker like you have always been, and you can't find where I said it can you chicken dick.
|
You misunderstand most of what you post, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 06:21 PM
|
#163
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You misunderstand most of what you post, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
|
99% of what you post is bullshit,because you make statements that are unsubstantiated, chicken dick. Unable to find where I said it chicken dick?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 06:29 PM
|
#164
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
You'd be one of the most unsubstantial POS in the forum, Ekim the Inbred Bred.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-06-2015, 06:32 PM
|
#165
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
+1
You just exposed a massive contradiction. And the libtards can't even address it.
.
|
What if we just don't give a fuck. Did you ever entertain that thought? So what if PP is subsidized. So is Exxon Mobil. It's not a massive anything. We want government out of the CHOICE. You're trying to wrap everything up together because that's the only way you have a case.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|