Review: was of time: lustndust

[atx11]

Date: 29 August
Provider: lustndust
Phone: 469-616-4019
Email Address: -
URL / Website: http://www.lustndustescortent.gfefiles.com/
City: austin
State: Texas
Address: 183/35
Appointment Type: Incall
Did the Appointment take place at the agreed-upon time?: No
Activities: Txt and she gave me address of hotel. When I showed up she txt me and said she wasn't available. Wouldn't be for like 90mins. WTF. Total waste of time and unprofessional.
Session Length: 30
Fee: $80
Hair Length and Color: Idk
Age: idk
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: Native/First Nations
Physical Description: Idk
Recommendation: No

[shlonghaul]

Lol, she pulled the same thing on me last night. Got to the point of getting the addy and went all crickets.

[ffireman]

Moved to coed no activities took place

[VictoriaLyn]

Question: did you guys have a set time?

[lustndust]

What a fake/negative review. We didn't have a set time. I just sent my address & was in an appointment whenever you wanted to see me.

For Shlonghaul, you've never contacted me so your 2 cents is irrelevant.

I'm always prompt & professional with my appointments.

[black sunshine]

Why would you send your address to a complete stranger if you didn't have an appointment scheduled?

[lustndust]

Because he had told me he wanted to see today but not at a specific time. I've had successful sessions before with clients who I give my address to & then come when they're ready. Yes I will take fault for not setting a specified time with every clients but he didn't need to be rude & disrespectful about it. I had apologized to him politely via text.

[Windinhishair]

Pass out your address out to several guys and just see who shows up.

Welcome to "Hooger Drive Thru". Would you like fries and a shake with that?

Eccie .... the new BP.

[illuminati]

I will say this that one or two Austin men laid out some hype on you and now two guys are calling NCNS. Not a good way to get started in Austin. Maybe a mod can see her and make everything all right.

[Windinhishair]

Originally Posted by illuminati

I will say this that one or two Austin men laid out some hype on you and now two guys are calling NCNS. Not a good way to get started in Austin. Maybe a mod can see her and make everything all right.

She's already been reviewed by ffireman.

She's legit. It's the whole back-to-back sessions thing that concerns me.

[illuminati]

Originally Posted by Windinhishair

She's already been reviewed by a ffireman.

She's legit. It's the whole back-to-back sessions thing that concerns me.

I stand corrected.

[lustndust]

I take fault on with atx11 by not setting a specific time with me but shlonghaul post about being a NCNS should be exiled. I checked my private messages & has only communicate once with me. Never called/texted me nor I set an appointment or gave an address. I'm weaning myself off the BP "functions" & still learning how to be a better provider here on ECCIE. My so called NCNS with atx11 wasn't deliberately done on purpose as I was in a session with a client. I'll say again, I apologize for the issue & will be better on scheduling appointments with a specified time.

Have a good night.

[Windinhishair]

Originally Posted by shlonghaul

Lol, she pulled the same thing on me last night. Got to the point of getting the addy and went all crickets.

What did she pull on you exactly?

She has a text history proving nothing was ever established between you.

What is the motive behind your post?

[black sunshine]

One might question your's also, why would you want to stay on board a sinking ship?
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1482858

[Windinhishair]

Originally Posted by black sunshine

One might question your's also, why would you want to stay on board a sinking ship?
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1482858

Speaking of motives. All one has to do is look at your post in that questionable review.

She has six solid yes reviews including from reputable mongers and mods.

Suddenly today she has one no review from a sleeper handle that has 22 posts since 2012 and no reviews prior to this thread.

If you view my posts in this thread it's obvious I'm being pretty objective. You however refer to this potentially great asset to the board as a sinking ship because of the one highly suspect and suddenly convenient no review.

She already explained the scheduling mishap taking full responsibility for the misunderstanding.

She is being extremely professional about the matter and should be given due credit for her desire to improve.

This thread is not a review which is why it's in coed.